I have to say I'm at a loss to see how a poem can be interpreted as a list!
One of the simplest tests (for me) of 'is this markup semantically
appropriate?' is to consider what your reaction would be if you saw it
without styles (or more correctly, with default styling). I would certainly
be
I used to have a browser extension that depended on java that could take
really nice screen shots. Either a whole webpage or just the viewport. I'm
sure you could find it on the mozilla extensions website.
Matijs
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 2:48 AM, kevin mcmonagle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I have to agree with Elizabeth here. Semantically I'd say that this is one
of the few occasions where a br/ would be appropriate. The verses would be
paragraphs of course.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Elizabeth Spiegel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to say I'm at a loss to see how a poem
I just tried to find the WSG's archive which took a Google search after
unsuccessfully searching for it on webstandardsgroup.org.
Why not include this link in the standard post footer next to the
guidelines link? Helps us search before we might ask again what has just
been discussed.
Cheers,
Just to point out something that hasn't been mentioned as far as I can
see -- of course, you can map file types to extensions on a webserver
however you like. You could set .JPG to serve as HTML if you wanted. The
original creators of Blogger, Pyra, used .pyra as their extension so I
have no idea
