But, if you're in the business of building web apps that target a specific platform.. :)
We all do, really. I am at home, and don't have the research here, but current statistics show that 97.4% of all devices accessing web content are running on Windows. Every one of these machines has IE
HA HA HA Not exactly, I work for the Government.
I don't think the statistic is that hard to believe really.My website gets 30,000 unique visitors a day, and the number of those using a non-windows OS is not even worth counting.
I love Firefox, but playing Devil's advocate, how can we justify to
AT LEAST TWICE with different browsers ...
On 7/15/05, David Pietersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HA HA HA Not exactly, I work for the Government.
I don't think the statistic is that hard to believe really.My website gets 30,000 unique visitors a day, and the number of those using a non-windows
Mordechai is totally rightin that it ishue that makes it difficult, but it is only within the specific context of combining the two (either Red/Green or Blue/Green).
I had a series of progressively more advanced CB tests when I went to join the Army, and ended up with a rating of 19, with 20
Visitors to my State Government site are almost divided exactly in half between 800x600 and 1024x768, based on around 30,000 unique visits per day, and we actually provide 2 versions of our sitethrough testing the res before we render the HTML.
There is a growing percentage of those with
Hi All,
Sorry if this is off topic, but I was thinking about picking up a copy of...
Accessible XHTML and CSS Web Sites: Problem - Design - Solutionby Jon Duckett
http://www.wrox.com/WileyCDA/WroxTitle/productCd-0764583069.html
Can anyone tell me if this is any good, or let me know of a better
Hi all,
Sorry to be a pain, but I am new to this list. Is there a place somewhere that lists the tools/techniques for doing the below?
Ok, we can validate for: * W3C HTML/XHTML * CSS * WAI * Section 508And I've recently learnt about accessibility checks for: * Colour blindness * Contrast *
Thank you so much! You just made my life about a million times easier!
dp.
On 23/08/05, Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Pietersen ...tools/techniques for doing the below? Ok, we can validate for:
* W3C HTML/XHTML* CSS* WAI* Section 508David,The W3C maintain a useful website
Hi all,
Sorry to ask a silly question, but is there a really good 'Fully Compliant' sample site I could see somewhere?
I am basically looking for a template, with associatedCSS files etc, that I could have a really good look at to see how it works rather thanread through stacks of rules.
Sorry if this has already come up... but have you seen these?
http://www.lenef.com/dotleader/
http://home.tampabay.rr.com/bmerkey/examples/dot-leaders.html
On 3/7/07, Dwain Alford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i don't think you are missing anything. imo what you are proposing in
your example is
Works fine for me...
IE 7.0.6000.16512 on Vista Ultimate
On 8/23/07, Bob Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some users have complained that when they go to this page
http://www.fifeweb.org/wp/lib/lib_current.html
and try to download the linked files with IE 7 they get a message
stating
I had to do this once in the past... and in the end I split the animation up
into its individual frames, optimized each frame to within an inch of its
life, then re-built it as an animation. Cut the file size down to 10% of
the original size.
I recall that I did screen-shots of every 'frame' of
Just tell the client that you can charge them for a full day of your time to
fix it, or they can just have a still version for free. Let them make the
decision for you ;-)
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Lynette Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I had to do this once in the past... and in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
