.
Of course these are just my whacked theories.
--
Regards,
Scott Barnes
-
http://www.mossyblog.com
http://www.bestrates.com.au
Simon Jessey wrote:
I'm afraid you've misinterpreted what I was trying to say, Chris. What
I was trying to say is this: Microsoft's dominant market position
creates
?
--
Regards,
Scott Barnes
-
http://www.mossyblog.com
http://www.bestrates.com.au
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
*
iFrame is valid XHTML 1 Transitional (and Frameset) but it is not available
in the Strict DTD (and probably won't be available in future recommendations
of XHTML). To embed a document in Strict, use the object element.
Something like:
object data=foo.html type=text/html width=500
,
but i'm used to it now.. but others well they'd go too hard pile
Regards
Scott Barnes
http://www.mossyblog.com
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
Scott Barnes wrote:
Are you absolutly positive about iframes not being available in
strict XHTML? because I've got one working as we speak?
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C
.. is there any
compatibility issues out there for using it that you know off?
Regards
Scott Barnes
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
Scott Barnes wrote:
Q. I've been on the List for a while now, and while i love the
webstandards concept, i'm finding it hard to believe that the web
will adjust itself to suite
Hugh Todd wrote:
Scott, you said,
If this IS the case, what benefits are we getting as developers for
taking on extra headaches in making it W3C compliant (who by the way
aren't an international elected body - more of a group that have
taken liberty to makeup standards).
Who would elect such a
the memory balance lower.
Good and valid points though.
Regards
Scott Barnes
Sincerely,
Lee Roberts
http://www.roserockdesign.com
http://www.applepiecart.com
-Original Message-
From: Hugh Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 11:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
Lee Roberts wrote:
Scott wrote:
[quote]I dunno, personally i have set reservations on webstandards being set
and expected to be followed no questions asked. You can join and
contribute ideas to the w3c but i can't find anywhere where i can
participate in some way as to how end decisions get made?
this would be the forum for such discussion.
Regards
Scott Barnes
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
*
FYI:
http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1086387609order=1count=10
Good read. Hit some points I tried to hit but failed :)
Scott
Scott Barnes wrote:
Hi All,
Firstly thankyou for contributing in this discussion, i know most of
you are probably feeling who is this clown, attacking W3C. This is
not infact
Just because Kiwis aren't Australians, doesn't mean we don't try and claim
them as our own..
*cough*
Pharlap...
Russel Crowe (heh, not that its worth bragging about)
Scott
- Original Message -
From: Mike Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004
in place, but to keep
ontopic with this list, I did put in some CSS framework approaches (ie
breaking up design,layout,formating,custom) for each control.
Not sure, anyone interested in that type of discussion.
--
Regards,
Scott Barnes
Mob: 04040 32812
URL: http://www.mossyblog.com
.. Code
cross-wiring there).
--
Scott Barnes
(RIA Evangelist)
Microsoft Ptyhttp://www.microsoft.com/australia | Blog:
http://blogs.msdn.com/msmossyblog | Office: +61 (2) 88179139 | Mobile:
0439-072-184
Twitter: twitter.com/mossybloghttp://twitter.com/mossyblog | MSN: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL
A lot of sins have to be forgiven :) heh.. I can't give any more on this as I
don't enjoy spending time with our legal team. Suffice to say, it's being
worked out :) (I know that has to suck as an answer, but insert patience
analogy here) heh.
Scott / Microsoft.
p.s nice youtube! :) (would
How do folks find the new OOXML format in regards to this line of thinking? In
that I'm curious to see what WSG thinks of it and how it fits in with future
potential.
-
Scott Barnes
{Product Manager}
Microsoft.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
15 matches
Mail list logo
