Bulletproof Web Design. It outlines common problems, the
old-school solution, and how the same thing can be done better with
CSS and good markup.
Good luck!
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
business: www.cleverstarfish.com
standards: kay.zombiecoder.com
coldfusion: kay.smoljak.com
personal: goatlady.wordpress.com
Is there a definition of what is considered tabular data (or is it in
the eyes of the beholder)?
If you would put it in a spreadsheet, it belongs in a table. Your
example is tabular data.
--
Kay Smoljak
business: www.cleverstarfish.com
standards: kay.zombiecoder.com
coldfusion: kay.smoljak.com
.
Whatever you decide to do, you should definitely NOT be recoding their
work without being paid for it.
--
Kay Smoljak
business: www.cleverstarfish.com
standards: kay.zombiecoder.com
coldfusion: kay.smoljak.com
personal: goatlady.wordpress.com
to this, if you need to preview locally, add this mark of the
web line to the head of the document:
!-- saved from url=(0014)about:internet --
That will suppress the local warning.
Nice-looking site btw.
--
Kay Smoljak
business: www.cleverstarfish.com
standards: kay.zombiecoder.com
coldfusion
separate things.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
that it allows you to create your templates however you wish -
I'd be willing to bet that this is one case where the problems
*cannot* be blamed on the CMS.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list for http
program is something you'd like to see!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
as 'no style'. The closest you'll get is to specify the same
padding, margins, font etc as your most common browser displays when
no author styles are specified.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list for http
-not-quite-well-formed pages that were parsed as soup
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
);
}
}
HTH,
Kay.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
On 1/23/06, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least, I'm fairly certain the absolutely positioned elements are
causing the problem(s).
I can't give an example page (NDA, and it's too complex to bother
recreating -- the complexity
weight on them, but probably not anywhere near as
much as on other elements such as the page title. That's really OT for
this list, however... a forum like SEOChat.com would probably be more
helpful to you on matters concerning SEO.
Cheers,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
On 1/19/06
underneath HSphere that allowed you to set the colours in the
font tags and the backgrounds of table cells - a massively complex
undertaking for what could be far more easily accomplished with a
stylesheet.
But enough ranting from me...
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com
- has anyone had any experience with Plesk who could
comment on whether it uses web standards (I doubt it but it doesn't
hurt to dream) or perhaps just good CSS? Is it easy to modify?
Thanks!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com
Not the best thing I learnt, but the best thing I did: going to Web
Essentials. I can't wait for next year.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org
.
Regards,
Kay.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
// begin code
// fix absolute positioning text selection problem with IE6
if (window.createPopup document.compatMode
document.compatMode==CSS1Compat){
document.onreadystatechange = onresize = function fixIE6AbsPos
but this looks like a major problem to me in IE.
So make it a few pixels narrower, to allow some wiggle room?
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
Hi Taco,
On 10/16/05, Taco Fleur - Pacific Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.startregistration.com
Validate your HTML first - at least then you can eliminate HTML
nesting errors as the cause of your problem. Then post back and we'll
give you a hand.
Cheers,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http
does not allow element H2 here; missing
one of OBJECT, MAP, BUTTON start-tag.
What does that mean?
The rest is the same, what is it talking about that I can't put a p
element in the place it is?
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com
especially like the
favicon - nice touch.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list for http
the line somewhere with
browser support. Your own logs are the only real way to determine
where that line lies.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org
be something similar which uses the KDE desktop.
According to Ben whom I'm sitting here now with, Knoppix (which also
runs off a CD/USB Stick or whatever) uses KDE - knoppix.org.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list
worth considering (for Australian
sites) IMHO.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
, or to do with linked sites we have no
control over - in other words, nothing to do with the construction or
implementation of the site itself. I think Jakob is probably quite
spot on in this case.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com
On 9/19/05, Stuart Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
autocomplete=off
I would check MSDN to see if there's a meta tag equivalent you can
use. I know with their imagetoolbar parameter, you can put a meta tag
in the head of the document to apply the same effect.
--
Kay Smoljak
http
On 9/18/05, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im using the class .corner to insert a bg image in the button.
It works apart from the stuborn bottom border that wont go away.
Any explanations for this?
Could it be a specificity problem? Instead of .corner{} try #drNav a.corner{}.
--
Kay
sorry, didn't look closely enough... that would be #drNav li.corner a{}
On 9/18/05, Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/05, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im using the class .corner to insert a bg image in the button.
It works apart from the stuborn bottom border that wont go
this person for more advice?
I had a client with OS9 who were using Netscape 4 (!), and I got them
to upgrade to Netscape 7. The later builds don't support OS9, but
earlier ones do, so if you look around you should be able to find one.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
to test
something, and the type just renders so beautifully at that res I can
stare at it for hours. Then I get sick of scrolling :)
I think accessibility is starting to be as much about accommodating
*any* browsing situation as much as accommodating disabilities.
--
Kay Smoljak
http
On 7/26/05, TN38 [Admin] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not starting to, it always has been.
What I meant was that more people are starting to see it that way.
Although way too many people still think accessible sites are for
blind people :)
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
to this element would force a scrollbar for lower
resolutions.
HTH,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
correct either (although better than option 1).
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
tip is to use Firefox or Mozilla with the web developer
toolbar, and turn on outline block level elements. This shows you
the exact space that each element is occupying.
Cheers,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
new standards blog: http://kay.zombiecoder.com
it can be made to degrade
acceptably. Could someone with a Mac please check the test page?
Thanks!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
-only version so their
staff on satelite phones in remote areas could access info... which is
fair enough! We'll give them a totally stripped down version using the
CMS.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http
instead) but I'm kinda lost for the right
words.
Does anyone know of a good online article/resource to help me out?
Something specific to Australian legislation would be fantastic.
Thanks!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion
on Webcredible:
http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-accessibility/text-only.shtml
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
write the tender for
them - they quite freely admit that they know nothing and are looking
for guidance. But I know your pain, we have lots of we know best
clients too :)
Thanks Jan too - that's a pretty concise summary.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
On 6/28/05, Drake, Ted C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's my question. What is the proper way to put nowrap in a td?
It currently looks like td nowrap I would think it should be td
nowrap=nowrap or something like that.
Yep, that's correct!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
and
accessibility reasons, and there's absolutely no problem with it.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
of users. Anything I'm missing? Any recent
documentation on browser support?
I've never really thought about it before, but now I'm intrigued...
what specific, real-world problem could be solved by the use of
display:inline-block?
Thanks,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
to install
Flash every time they visit the page.
I could be wrong - I don't think I tested it with the alterate content
actually in the object tag.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
a bit funny in how it handles plugins.
JavaScript detection seemed to be the safest way.
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
On 5/25/05, heretic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that if Flash wasn't installed, the browser would prompt you
to download and install it rather than just
standards.
I would recommend Zeldman's Designing with web standards as a good
primer, on both how to approach web standards and why.
My copy has been around our office several times now and is looking
rather dog-eared and annotated. I'm still not allowed to take it home!
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http
to be
bothered with a complex layout that's out of their tabular
comfort-zone.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
On 5/18/05, Geoff Deering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I have never come across a browser, which installed with Macromedia
Flash pre-installed.
IE6 comes with Flash player pre-installed.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
On 5/18/05, Geoff Deering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IE6 comes with Flash player pre-installed.
All versions, or a specific implementation/installation?
I can't say for sure, but my feeling is that it's all versions.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
away from it (IE5's market
share is definitely dropping throught the floor).
Hope that's helpful,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
a print stylesheet and
changing position:absolute to position:relative (as well as removing
unnecessary navigation and a few other things).
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
On 5/5/05, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, have anybody done the e-commerce site that is fully xhtml validated?
This one is valid:
http://www.australianopalsrus.com.au
This one still has a few minor issues that are being fixed:
http://www.elizabethsbookshop.com.au
--
Kay Smoljak
http
Vincent Flanders only includes business and/or public service sites as
web sites that suck - he has stated in the past that he considers
personal sites, entertainment sites etc to fall under different
rules.
Plus he's a lot more with it than Jakob, and more of a standards
evangelist which Mr
they should)... but
I wonder what the person responsible for picking a web designer would
think if you told them them that Google can only see about five pages
of that site?
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http
again. However, the biggest risk is your competitors
- if I see a site spamming a search engine I report it. Many people do
the same, and there *have* been cases of the engines taking action.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
. Personally, I wouldn't dream of turning a
client away, but that's just me!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
, and if you use
Dreamweaver templates you can specify which parts of the page the
client is allowed to edit. It's very squarely targeted at
*maintenance* rather than you can use this to build your own web
site. Highly recommended!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:27:46 +0100, kemie guaida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can use IE's conditional comments, which let you target specific
versions of IE:
Unfortunately, conditional comments are Windows only :(
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
://dean.edwards.name/ - although I haven't checked
recently.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
,
accessibility-wise and from a web standards perspective. I would
highly recommend checking out the Suckerfish menus -
http://www.htmldog.com/articles/suckerfish/dropdowns/ - they're
simple, lightweight, search engine friendly and all round fantastic.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
not to like? :)
Zeldman's book talks about each of these ideas at length.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:24:29 +1000, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, not particularly - the search engines dont seem to be semantic at all.
In my experience - and seo is part of my job - search engines *do*
place higher relevance on keywords inside H1 tags.
--
Kay Smoljak
http
/articles/suckerfish/dropdowns/
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
you... those standalone versions are very, very confused about their
identities :)
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
the standalone versions to be accurate for
anything. I have a Virtual PC image with Windows 98 SE and IE
5.00.2614.3500 and Windows 2000 with IE 5.50.4134.0600 - but no 5.01,
unfortunately. If you'd like me to take some screenshots anyway just
send the link.
Cheers,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http
the conditional comment syntax wasn't
quite right. The way they handle GT and LT is a little odd... I'd
check what you have against MSDN.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
?
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
is a) not serving their market; and b) most probably illegal.
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
[1] Imagined conversation:
Some pointy-haired boss:
Oh dear, what about all this accessibility legislation?
17yo work experience dude who's just completed their Certificate in
Multimedia:
Don't worry
everyone knows how to
get them and how to install them.
Good luck!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
for effective search engine optimisation, but it's certainly a good
start, and also an awesome selling point.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
was really searching for
words that would say your requirements are bad for web standards and
accessibility and therefore bad for your site which I think is mostly
on-topic.
Cheers!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list
possibilities will be limited, the accessibility of the site lessened,
and download time increased.
I'm feeling like this whole week is one big Friday afternoon, and that
somehow sounds rather lame. Can anyone recommend any other reasons or
throw in some kick-arse buzzwords to make me look good?
--
Kay
to the main state
government stuff. They're currently discussing getting rid of it
completely.
Anyway, it will be interesting to see what they come up with when the
new common badging is released.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
that accessibility is a big issue for them and I
have no doubt the new sites will be much, much better than what's
there now. I believe that several years of planning and discussion has
gone into the project!
I might drop an email to someone and try to find out more...
Cheers,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
://emacspeak.sourceforge.net/
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
if breadcrumbs are really that important.
This is veering off-topic rapidly, but here's an interesting
discussion on real world data on the use of breadcrumb navigation
which suggests they're not utilised by most average users:
http://www.humanfactors.com/downloads/oct04.asp#kath
--
Kay Smoljak
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 01:21:14 +, Patrick H. Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kay Smoljak wrote:
There's a number of different screenreaders available for testing.
Some are free, others have trial periods. I recently installed the
demo version of JAWS under Virtual PC - it will run for 40
before, Johannes - I'll have to try
it out. Thanks!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
as text/plain instead of
text/css.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:57:29 +0800, Vicki Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I rarely even mention web standards to clients anymore unless they are
snip
Amen!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http
exactly where it is, but if
you set up a Top Style site you should see the option. Basically it
finds classes and ids in your css that aren't used in your HTML, and
classes and ids used in your HTML that aren't defined in your css.
Very handy!.
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
it, Outlook will handle threads
quite acceptably if you choose Arrange By - Conversation from the
View menu :)
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
to the idea of doing things a different way. We're
fairly resigned to the fact that we need to train new people.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
On 25 Nov 2004 11:25:56 +1100, Andrew Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's very interesting and tallies completely with my experience. Mind you
it with a
background image, ala Faux Columns
(http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fauxcolumns/).
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
the page anyway.
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 08:38:48 -0700, Shane Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This works on Mac Firefox, but not in Safari or IE.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 1:22 AM, Florin Cojitza wrote:
object type=application/x-shockwave-flash data=banner.swf
etc.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
to
the containing DIV or the UL, LI or A elements.
Try removing all line breaks between your list items, ie:
ulliitem one/liliitem two/li/ul
Cheers,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
/ - the analyzer
gives specific recommended sizes for each component of a page (css,
js, html, images), and reasons for each too.
Another useful tool that reports on similar aspects is
http://www.sitereportcard.com/
Cheers,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
Don't forget to sign up if you're in Perth too!
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:51:40 +1000, Nigel McFarlane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.openforce.at/mozparty2/?view=AU
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http
(bad) browser behaviour -
when no doctype is present.
If you post the pages exhibiting the problem, I'm sure someone here
will be able to give you some idea as to why.
Cheers,
Kay.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list
I've found on how CSS positioning works is
http://www.brainjar.com/css/positioning/ - I had it saved on my PDA
and read it every morning on the train ride into work for weeks, until
it really sank in.
Cheers,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:12 -0700, Ted Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know an online resource that emulates netscape 4.7?
Why not just install it on your dev machine? It's not that bad...
http://browsers.evolt.org has an archive with heaps of different
versions.
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
widgets is highly
OS-dependent, so most people probably don't bother.
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards
. Where else will you get to
hang out with html geeks, standards nazis and css heads? You can learn
stuff just by osmosis.
Yet another reason to support conferences like these is to encourage
the industry to hold more.
Damn, I *so* wish I could go!
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
for stuffing the
navigation and masthead fluff down the bottom of the source code (good
for screen readers and search engines). You go with what suits the
project.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http
for any pointers...
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held
the pages to see if I ever actually did any of
that.
Cheers!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility
it, and Google is not being
helpful. Has anyone seen anything like this before?
http://203.59.70.252/wsg/
Thanks for any advice or pointers!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters
to display:none.
Sorry, that probably doesn't help you too much!
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:56:20 +1000, Gavin Cooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a page that when someone tries to print it in IE 6 on
windows, it crashes the browser.
There's
. Ick.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 02:59:48 +0200, John Britsios
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question: Doesn't my web site pages here http://www.webnauts.net have a
logical navigation structure, therefore I do need to use the Tabindex tags
, and it will use the IE5 box model... yuck.
another page about it here:
http://blog.tom.me.uk/2003/07/23/boie6selecta.php
This looks interesting... if it works in an external file, I think
I'll add this to my box of standard tricks. Good one!
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
