Thanks folks. I know nothing about server-side validation, so that's more
learning for me . . .
(or some carpentry, maybe :-)
Bob
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Hi All,
I have recently attempted to 'trap' spammers who use autofilling tactics on the
site at www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk. This is written in html5 and uses a
mixture of simple tests to validate the form. However, yesterday I recvd a
mail thus:
OK, this isn't about standards, but it's more interesting than knowing that
folk are not in the office . . .
How can I make a web page appear as the latest version in all browsers, i.e.,
perform a cache bypass? And I don't mean for me - I mean for all visitors to
the page? Is it possible?
In what way is sup more presentational than p?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Rapley
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Cc: Teddy Knoy
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] which tag to use for link to reference?
I would go with David Dorwood’s
- Original Message -
From: David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Cc: Kevin Erickson kevinlerick...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] cross-browser or vendor-specific CSS
Start with a simple design for mobile and old
Has anyone encountered problems with AOL mail such as this:
A friend of mine has a website for his business and he has a domain. I set it
for him so that his domain mail redirects to joeblo...@aol.com (he doesn't
want his mail published here, so I made that name up :-) However, he informs
have checked all these Bob then you can't do anymore and
it's up to the domain support to sort out as you don't have backend access.
Dan
- Original Message -
From: coder
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 9:49 AM
Subject: [WSG] AOL
Hi all,
I've been looking at stuff like this (check for these chars and disable
submit button if present):
function check(node)
{
var re = new RegExp('[\?\\[\\]]', 'g');
document.getElementById('sub').disabled = re.test(node.value);
}
What I'm asking now is, is there an equivalent
I have a very simple html5 contact form which I'd like to keep that way.
However, the 'pattern' attribute isn't recognised by IE and I feel that it
surely must be possible to just use a bit of modernizr to make it work.
Example is:
label for=email accesskey=EEmail/label
input
Come on Steve, tell us why not then?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Steve Green steve.gr...@testpartners.co.uk
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
-Original Message-
From:
ul
li class=title
strongQuick links/strong
/li
li
a href=noticeboard.html title=news and Notices
Noticeboard
/a
/li
li
- Original Message -
From: Patrick H. Lauke re...@splintered.co.uk
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: tabs - was[WSG] Expected behaviour of links to external
websites
Again, let me turn this discussion around once more. Explain to us
Brilliantly put Janice!
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Janice Schwarz jan...@geekartist.net
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Expected behaviour of links to external websites
There are still many people that have not used
I just wonder what the view of some 'anti-new windows' folk is towards using
tabs? I would have thought that tabs are the new 'new windows'??
And doesn't the popularity of tabs imply that users do like to have more
than one page 'on the go' instead of doing a lot of back and forwarding?
I am
- Original Message -
From: Rob Crowther robe...@boogdesign.com
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: tabs - was[WSG] Expected behaviour of links to external
websites
On 30/12/2011 12:32, coder wrote:
I just wonder what the view of some
- Original Message -
From: Patrick H. Lauke re...@splintered.co.uk
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Expected behaviour of links to external websites
Can I just turn this around? To those on this discussion so adamant that
What fascinates me (still) is that a PC (laptop, whatever) works by
displaying many windows. Hell fire, the OS is called 'windows' . . . (unless
you are a fruit fan). All the common programs employ 'several' windows to
make their functionality easier to handle (just look at Dreamweaver or any
behaviour of links to external websites
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:39 AM, coder co...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
wrote:
What fascinates me (still) is that a PC (laptop, whatever) works by
displaying many windows. Hell fire, the OS is called 'windows' . . .
(unless
you are a fruit fan). All
In one sense, this argument is fallacious, because whatever the web designer
does decides what happens when a user just 'clicks a link'. In my
experience, most folk 'out there' don't know about right clicking. To say
'it is the user's choice' is mainly untrue, because he/she doesn't know
I have used this CSS :
a[rel=external] {
padding-right: 13px;
background: url(outofit.gif) no-repeat right top;
}
With this code:
a href=../sjp.html rel=external onclick=window.open(this.href); return
false;THIS/a is a link to a new window
or, for html5:
a href=../sjp.html rel=external
Michael Kear wrote:
Ive looked and Ive looked, and I cant see whats the matter here..
When this page loads in IE, the body content of the page doesnt
appear. However when you put another window over the top and come back
to it, there the content is. Its loading ok, as a vew source will
21 matches
Mail list logo
