Chris Moncus wrote:
In looking over the W3C's documentation and such I got the hang of it
and have been using the Bobby Validator for Section 508 validation (
http://bobby.watchfire.com/bobby/html/en/index.jsp ). I want to make
sure that I am doing things correctly though. Could any of you
Mordechai Peller wrote:
The fact is the onclick is misnamed; a more
accurate name would be onactivate since it's triggered by both the
mouse and keyboard.
Indeed, considering the W3C's push of XHTML as a truly platform agnostic
system.
--
-David R
I've always used the validator at http://www.contentquality.com/ over
Bobby. I like the way it breaks things down for you.
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:55:01 +, David R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mordechai Peller wrote:
The fact is the onclick is misnamed; a more
accurate name would be
hi,
I haven't spent a lot of time worrying about the disabled or impaired
users of my projects because of the youth-focussed intent of them.
Just a thought on demographics: there are plenty of young people with
relevant disabilities. Plus there are people with technological
disadvantages or
Looking back, that looks like I basically said I made the site so old
people couldn't use it. I still wrote so that screen readers had an
easy time and other major things to do. What I meant is that I wasn't
intent on following every recommendation for accessibility because of
the (what I
Aaah, the accessibility validators chestnut... I'm surprised Patrick
and Derek and haven't dropped in on this thread yet ;)
Unfortunately machines can't check for accessiblity. Really, they can't.
Until they do checks like rendering pages and making sure link targets
aren't incredibly small, (eg:
First, thanks for the community support of standards. Too many
developers I know have not seen the light, so to say, of standards. I
look forward to what I can both learn and share with you guys (
generic, includes females :D ).
Now, for my question:
I haven't spent a lot of time worrying
