Nope sorry, > The correct content type or MIME type for an XHTML document is > "application/xhtml+xml".
This (mime type issue) is only required for XHTML 1.1. You don't have to do it for XHTML 1.0 Transitional (which the example was). The answer to Jamie's original question is to have a look at the source of some valid XHTML documents (like http://we04.com/ off the top of my bald head) to see what others use or paste the code you sent us into a validator (I suggest http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/direct.html for direct input) or even more simple, validate it in your code editor. If you're not using a code editor (notepad isn't a code editor it's a text editor) get one! It's simply amazing what google will show you on these topics as well! http://www.google.com/search?q=xhtml+mime+type http://www.google.com/search?q=xhtml+doctype Sorry Jamie, just trying to teach people how to fish (on a very well documented issue) instead of catching and cooking it. Sorry if this approach offends anyone but if it saves just 10% of the stuff coming into my inbox it's worth it (66 posts and 161 bounces from this list so far today). Peter ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
