Thank you Peter for the quick response and heads-up!
I'm puzzled because I'm using Windows XP Home edition and checked the site
in IE 6 and FF 1.0, and the logo isn't skewed. I'm using absolute
positioning for the logo, therefore if any of the many WSG experts can
provide some advice, or solution
G'day
I'm puzzled because I'm using Windows XP Home edition and checked the site
in IE 6 and FF 1.0, and the logo isn't skewed. I'm using absolute
positioning for the logo, therefore if any of the many WSG experts can
provide some advice, or solution it would be greatly appreicated.
I'd say you
Title: RE: [WSG] Acronym within th Screen Readers
Thanks a lot guys, that's excellent, really really helpful. Cheers!
I do need the abbreviated version to be in the TH if possible as I have three columns which apply to long abbreviations/acronyms, but who's table cells are just checkboxes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Thank you Peter for the quick response and heads-up!
I'm puzzled because I'm using Windows XP Home edition and checked the site
in IE 6 and FF 1.0, and the logo isn't skewed. I'm using absolute
positioning for the logo, therefore if any of the many WSG experts can
Hello, group.
I'm having a heck of a time with a particular image that I have
positioned on my site. Because it has to blend in with three different
background colors, I have it anti-aliased accordingly. The problem is
that in Firefox and IE (on XP) the image doesn't show up in exactly the
G'day
that in Firefox and IE (on XP) the image doesn't show up in exactly the
same place, so the blending background is off-set. Right now, it looks
good in Firefox, but not IE. Is there something I can do to guarantee
that image's position on the site, regardless of the browser? The
guitar
Ingo Chao schrieb:
And this may cause the drop of the right column-float under the content when the viewport is
sized wide enough.
Sorry, maybe this effect is not reproduceable on your font/screen/cache
settings, so here is a screenshot of the drop in IE6
Thanks for the tip. The use of tables is my client's request. He's too
afraid to exclude those who won't be able to see it properly. I tried
to convince him otherwise, but he was firm. The inline styles are just
for my own tweaking purposes -- I'll put them in the external once I
have it
There are two issues to do with abbreviations that have come up on list
today:
1. the distinction between the abbr element and the abbr attribute
2. the difference between abbreviations and acronyms
So, I thought I'd open the can of worms that Patrick mentioned earlier
today
Title: RE: [WSG] Acronym within th Screen Readers
ack, annoyingly you don't get a tooltip in ie for abbr, but do for acronym.
From: Jamie Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 March 2005 09:27
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject: RE: [WSG]
russ - maxdesign
Acronyms
--
Acronyms are a subset of abbreviations, as they are still
shortened words.
However, they are more specific. An acronym is defined as a
WORD formed from
the initial letters of a multi-word name. The important point
here is that
an
Heh...I was waiting for you to discover that... ;)
Patrick
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jamie
MasonSent: 17 March 2005 11:32To:
'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'Subject: RE: [WSG] Acronym
within th Screen Readers
ack,
Patrick:
However, for people who do like to split hairs, I'd take this one step
further and say: does WORD imply pronouncability? Discuss...
er.. pronouncability?
Apparently under US law it is completely acceptable for a name to be spelt
Brown yet pronounced Smith.
Generally speaking
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:35:40 -, Mike Foskett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently under US law it is completely acceptable for a name to be spelt
Brown yet
pronounced Smith.
Which might go some way to explaining my confusion upon finding out
that the name Choire was pronounced Cory, and
Pedantry is like chocolate. There's no such thing as
enough. :)
lol pix, thats so true!
Shaun Johnson
IT Technician
Waddesdon CE School
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email has been sent from the Buckinghamshire LEA system if
Thanks to all.
Finally i think i will have to use some hacks and maybe some negative
margins.
El mié, 16-03-2005 a las 18:05, Gianfranco Todini escribió:
Hi,
I've just finished a website using a 3cols fluid layout and I've used this
method:
Hello all --
I'm having issues with the right column on my site
(http://www.aekituesday.com) in IE.
The text aligns too much on the right and the advertisement listed on
the page looks completely crazy. In Firefox it looks great!
The CSS code is listed here
Upon loading, I received the error 'google_ad_width undefined', which
may relate to the ad issue...
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 08:13 -0800, Jenny Francois wrote:
Hello all --
I'm having issues with the right column on my site
(http://www.aekituesday.com) in IE.
The text aligns too much on
Hi,
Is there a value in reading the XHTML w3org specifications? What would
be more productive in advancing understanding of XHTML/CSS?
CK
___
An ideal is merely the projection, on an enormously
enlarged scale, of some aspect of personality.
Chris,
I'm finding a great value in reading the w3c specs while working on a
current project. A few other resources are also helping me advance my
understanding of XHTML/CSS: the book 'The Zen of CSS Design',
alistapart.com and several other websites. Looking at work from other
developers and
Jenny Francois schrieb:
I'm having issues with the right column on my site
(http://www.aekituesday.com) in IE.
The text aligns too much on the right
It's a pain to debug such huge generated pages :)
A simplified testcase would be nice.
Anyway, some of the problems started at Tuesday, February 22.
Thanks Bert, but please know that I didn't make any assumptions about
screen resolution, but simply failed to checked the site in 800X600. I
always check my sites in different screen resolutions, but dropped the
ball this time.
Thanks for the reminder, and I'll fix the problem accordingly.
Kind
Definitly,
There are a /lot /of things you find in th specs that are overlooked
elsewhere. The DOM specs are about the only descent easy-to-download
reference I've seen on DOM, I'd be lost without them.
Alan Trick
diona kidd wrote:
Chris,
I'm finding a great value in reading the w3c specs while
Hi all
KDE have just put out v3.4 of their desktop environment which includes
some nifty new accessibility features for K applications like
Konquerer (Safari's sibling).
Haven't upgraded yet but it certainly looks beneficial for those of
us using text to speech mechanisms that don't want to be
Thanks for that, getting those widths right always annoys me cause the box
model doesn't work right!
To expand on the simple 2 column layout, how can I have a fixed width left
column (for navigation) and a right column that fills the rest of the space.
This is achieved in tables by setting the
Hi
Some of you may have come across the web-standards antics of
WebStandardsMan on various internet forums and newsgroups.
Just FYI, yes... that's me
I was wondering if there were any comic-book artists, or anyone with a
talent with DC/Marvel style illustration who's prepared to spend some
time
Hi,
i want to use a print-stylesheet and it works fine in IE but Opera 7
and Firefox seem to ignore it...
Can someone help me?
url: http://www-mw.uni-regensburg.de/
print-css: http://www-mw.uni-regensburg.de/css/mw_print.css
Thank you!
--
Christoph
On 18 Mar 2005, at 8:51 am, Christoph Mandl wrote:
i want to use a print-stylesheet and it works fine in IE but Opera 7
and Firefox seem to ignore it...
Can someone help me?
url: http://www-mw.uni-regensburg.de/
print-css: http://www-mw.uni-regensburg.de/css/mw_print.css
You can only have one
Untitled DocumentI am wanting to get some inline javascript to validate to
xhtml1.1, which can be done via cdata regions. What's browser support for
these like? Is this another area of brainnumbing hacks and problems?
Siggy
script type=text/javascript ![CDATA[Lots of juicy
symbols.]]/script
No worries, just put some extra symbols there:
script type=text/javascript
!--//![CDATA[
...
//]]--
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:47:11 +1300, Sigurd Magnusson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Untitled DocumentI am wanting to get some inline javascript to validate to
xhtml1.1, which can be done via cdata
Stevio wrote:
To expand on the simple 2 column layout, how can I have a fixed width left
column (for navigation) and a right column that fills the rest of the
space.
This is achieved in tables by setting the left cell to, for example, 150
width, and the right column to 100%.
Despite my strong
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:59:41 +1100, Dmitry Baranovskiy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No worries, just put some extra symbols there:
script type=text/javascript
!--//![CDATA[
...
//]]--
And that would make browsers which use XML parser to ignore script
altogether (assuming XHTML1.1 is served widh
32 matches
Mail list logo
