Re: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-03 Thread Ben Bishop
Hi Kay,

 well as some awesome-looking examples of styled headings, to make them

Dave Shea has some nice examples of using Times New Roman, half way 
through the article at:
http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2003/07/24/times_new_ro/

Cheers,

--ben
http://www.daemon.com.au/
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 



Re: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-03 Thread russ weakley
Oops. You're correct!
Maybe I should just let John quote himself!  :)
Russ


 
 Russ,
 
 Perhaps this quote of John Allsop's should read, ...how much worse is
 it to put *content* inside the CSS file?
 
 -Hugh Todd :)
 
 John Allsopp (one of the original CSS guru's) explains this better
 than I
 can...  He says If it is bad to put presentation on the page, how much
 worse is it to put presentation inside the CSS file? It is
 fundamentally
 unsound.

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 



Re: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-03 Thread Chris Blown

Granted, these are just examples by Dave, but this demonstrates why you
should always include font-family.
 
My browser defaults to sans serif here, since I don't have Times New
Roman. From the font survey link posted yesterday I guess I am one of
the 20 odd percent of Linux users who don't have this font. From my
experience with Linux Times is the most common.

font-family : Times New Roman, Times, serif;

Regards
Chris Blown

 Dave Shea has some nice examples of using Times New Roman, half way 
 through the article at:
 http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2003/07/24/times_new_ro/
 


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 



Re: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-03 Thread Chris Blown

The CSS3 content property is a grey semantic area IMHO.

If you have hn content in the markup and adjust the presentation in the
CSS like colours, fonts and backgrounds, 

Then what's so unsound about styling the content with an image, this is
not content in my mind it is presentation, because it provides 
ornamentation (what CSS was designed to do) whilst preserving the element 
it was applied to.

If the author ensures the image only does replacement, in other words no
extra content is included in the image, then by removing the style sheet
you don't lose anything but presentation.

I agree with the idea that using the content property for adding content
is a bad idea, but using content for replacement is not so bad as
everyone is making out.

Anyway since only a couple of browsers support this, its not a real
alternative, yet...

Cheers
Chris Blown

 Perhaps this quote of John Allsop's should read, ...how much worse is 
 it to put *content* inside the CSS file?
 


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 



Re: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-03 Thread Kay Smoljak
russ weakley wrote:

However, all of these image replacement methods have serious downsides that
should be explained to designers before they jump on them as a solution.
 

That's my view exactly. Some of the techniques are very good, but 
there's still nothing I'd want to use on a commercial site, where I 
think hackery should be kept to a minimum. Not to mention the extra 
development time - using css for layout is already pushing out the time 
required for html.

Which is why I was looking for resources on fonts and examples of nicely 
styled headings. I want to prove to the designers that it *can* be done, 
images not required! Thanks to everyone who responded - much appreciated.

We have a local internet industry social group here in Perth 
(http://www.port-80.net). Last night I heard that the next event will be 
a designers vs developers debate. Should be funny, although it could 
possibly end in violence :)

K.

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 



RE: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-02 Thread Nick Cowie

Kay

wrote:
I have the visibone font survey[1] already - 
 does anyone 
 know of  any other resources or great examples?
 

There is the Code Style font survey:
http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/
Which has a far larger sample than visibone, but I don't know about it's accuracy (it 
is a self completed test) or how valid the sample is (ie the people most likely to 
complete the test are web designers).

Nick
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*



RE: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-02 Thread Nick Cowie

Scott

wrote:
did  you ever see this at Russ' website:
 http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/headings-as-images/index.cfm
 
 It's a nice article about using images for headings, but 
 still getting all the benefits of Hx tags.

Fahrner Image Replacement seems to be the name given to it, you will more about it 
here:
http://www.stopdesign.com/also/articles/replace_text/
and here:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fir/
(talking accessability and who it works with screen readers)

Nick
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*



RE: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-02 Thread mantrobu

Fahrner Image Replacement
is all well and good, but does anyone have any pointers to using a similar
method that will work (ie: display replacement text) for users with images
turned off?

Martin 








Nick Cowie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/03/2004 03:10 PM
Please respond to wsg

To:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
   
Subject:
   RE: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags



Scott

wrote:
did you ever see this at Russ' website:
 http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/headings-as-images/index.cfm
 
 It's a nice article about using images for headings, but 
 still getting all the benefits of Hx tags.

Fahrner Image Replacement seems to be the name given to it, you will more
about it here:
http://www.stopdesign.com/also/articles/replace_text/
and here:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fir/
(talking accessability and who it works with screen readers)

Nick
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 




Re: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-02 Thread Scott Mebberson




Yep,

There's a whole bunch of different techniques for it, all with various
names.
Russ' article links to all of em :)

cheers,

Scott.

Nick Cowie wrote:

  Scott

wrote:
  
  
did  you ever see this at Russ' website:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/headings-as-images/index.cfm

It's a nice article about using images for headings, but 
still getting all the benefits of Hx tags.

  
  
Fahrner Image Replacement seems to be the name given to it, you will more about it here:
http://www.stopdesign.com/also/articles/replace_text/
and here:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fir/
(talking accessability and who it works with screen readers)

Nick
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 

  


-- 
Scott Mebberson
Director. CTO
Enpresiv Group

Team Macromedia Flash
Macromedia Certified Professional

email [EMAIL PROTECTED] | web www.enpresiv.com
ph 1300 883 108 | international +61 421 117 508 | mobile 0421 117 508





RE: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-02 Thread Hill, Tim
Title: Message



provide a gun to shoot themselves? (and mail one to the19 people 
still using n4.7)


Tim 
HillComputer 
AssociatesGraphic Artisttel:+612 9937 
0792fax: +612 9937 0546[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  
  -Original Message-From: Universal Head 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 3 March 2004 3:56 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [WSG] Nicely 
  styled Hx tags
  The question is, how do we provide accessible websites for those with 
  images, text, and indeed their computer switched off?? 
  ;) It's been a long afternoon, 
  Peter 
  On 03/03/2004, at 3:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  Fahrner Image Replacement
  Universal 
  Head 
  Design That Works. 
  7/43 Bridge Rd Stanmore 
  NSW 2048 Australia 
  T (+612) 
  9517 1466 
  F (+612) 
  9565 4747 
  E 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  W 
  www.universalhead.com 


RE: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-02 Thread Lindsay Evans

Kay Smoljak wrote:
 does anyone know of  any other resources or great
 examples?

I may be slightly biased, but I think the centre h2  h3 headings
('Weblog' and 'This is a weblog post') on my as yet unfinished redesign look
pretty good:
http://lindsay.f2o.org/stage/layout.html

There might be something good in CSS Zen Garden (http://csszengarden.com/),
although most of them that I could see used images.

If you're only targetting IE, then you could use WEFT to embed your fonts:
(http://www.microsoft.com/typography/web/embedding/weft3/default.htm), but
there isn't an equivalent for Gecko-based browsers :|

--
 Lindsay Evans.

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 



Re: [WSG] Nicely styled Hx tags

2004-03-02 Thread Kay Smoljak
Scott Mebberson wrote:

I'm not sure about any font examples like the Visibone one, however, 
did you ever see this at Russ' website:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/headings-as-images/index.cfm
I've yet to see an image replacement technique that worked for search 
engines, was cross-browser and didn't involve lots of messing around. 
I'd really much prefer to just style the h1 tags - background images can 
make them look pretty speccy. I will definitely check that article out, 
maybe I'm just lazy :)

I'm in the same boat as you. Our designers love to use image headings, 
but I hate it for a whole swag of reasons, mailing search engine 
placements which using images (usually) kills. Anyhow, I found it to 
be a great article. Hopefully it'll help you with this issue too. You 
may have to compromise!


Heh heh, I'm lucky that I don't have to compromise. if SEO is involved, 
they have to do what I say!
*evil chuckle*

thanks for the link!

K.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*