Re: [WSG] footer technique

2005-07-16 Thread Joshua Street
I don't have a Mac either, but supposedly Konqueror and Safari use similar rendering engines, so I tested in that instead. It is indeed mildly broken, but certainly acceptable. The footer will render at the very bottom of the viewport on page load without any problems, HOWEVER, if the user

Re: [WSG] footer technique

2005-07-16 Thread Vicki Berry
Looks perfect to me in Safari 2.0, OS 10.4.2. Vicki. :-) Kay Smoljak wrote: Could someone with a Mac please check the test page? ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

Re: [WSG] footer technique

2005-07-16 Thread Rick Faaberg
On 7/16/05 4:01 AM Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out: Explanation: http://solardreamstudios.com/learn/css/footerstick/ Example: http://solardreamstudios.com/_img/learn/css/footerstick/footerstick.html Apparently it doesn't work in IE5 Mac or Safari. IE5 Mac I can mostly live

Re: [WSG] footer technique

2005-07-16 Thread Rick Faaberg
On 7/16/05 4:15 AM Rick Faaberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out: Apparently it doesn't work in IE5 Mac or Safari. IE5 Mac I can mostly live without, but Safari is a bit of a bugger. I don't have a Mac here so I can't test - I'm curious as to whether it can be made to degrade acceptably. Could

Re: [WSG] footer technique

2005-07-16 Thread Maarten Stolte
Hello, Joshua Street wrote: I don't have a Mac either, but supposedly Konqueror and Safari use similar rendering engines, so I tested in that instead. It is indeed mildly broken, but certainly acceptable. The footer will render at the very bottom of the viewport on page load without any

Re: [WSG] footer technique

2005-07-16 Thread Francesco Sanfilippo
Easy. I don't rely on Javascript for anything critical. I would rather use a layout hack without Javascript. Francesco On 7/16/05, Maarten Stolte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why not just use the technique from Bobby van der Sluis, it works all the time on dom enabled browsers;