Re: [wsjt-devel] Q65 crashes unexpectantly

Hi Tom,I’m running a Kenwood TS590SG with a Rigblaster Advantage. The mode was 30A. No CAT being used.I looked at the Windows Event Viewer but not too sure what to look for. I did see some errors that related back to WSJT-X. This is one that I copied:Log Name:  ApplicationSource:   

Re: [wsjt-devel] Q65 crashes unexpectantly

Any details - screen shots of error messages - seems like there are three different one? What mode are you using Rig? Cat Control? Time setup? Could it be RFI - run into a dummy load With 'fatal error’ anything in Windows Event Viewer? Will need some more details before can make a suitable

Re: [wsjt-devel] ft8 not decode I can decode ft4

I would ask if you were on the right frequency or traditional FT8 frequency Rick KD0XD On 2/20/2021 2:09 PM, Donald Rossman wrote: I have ft8 2.2.0 I have windows 10 Ft8 not decode ft4 do decode In still t8 2.2.0 ___ wsjt-devel mailing list

Re: [wsjt-devel] ft8 not decode I can decode ft4

Moon, we will need a little more than “it doesn’t work” to help you out. I presume you have checked your audio paths and clock? Can you provide more details of your installation and the specific problem? George, KF2T > On Feb 20, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Donald Rossman wrote: > > I have ft8 2.2.0 >

Re: [wsjt-devel] ft8 not decode I can decode ft4

upgrade to 2.3. From: Donald Rossman Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2021 3:09 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [wsjt-devel] ft8 not decode I can decode ft4 I have ft8 2.2.0 I have windows 10 Ft8 not decode ft4 do decode In still t8 2.2.0

[wsjt-devel] ft8 not decode I can decode ft4

I have ft8 2.2.0 I have windows 10 Ft8 not decode ft4 do decode In still t8 2.2.0 ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] ft8 not decode

Ft8 not decode I have not see ppl in ft8 I do see ppl in ft4 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] What percentage of bits need to be decoded correctly?

Jeff, As Joe already pointed you cannot send two messages in a single timeslot! It is another issue that there are also messages that contain information to two users such as: TU; K1ABC W9XYZ 579 WI in RTTY RU or K1ABC RR73; W9XYZ -08 in DXpedition messages. 73, Reino OH3mA From: jeff

Re: [wsjt-devel] What percentage of bits need to be decoded correctly?

Hello all, FT8 in this instance. The cases where this may matter - cq started, but notice another station I want to tail end...so double click the call in mid TX?... or have to wait for end transmission? - 73 in progress and want to set up for next station, can I double click next call

Re: [wsjt-devel] What percentage of bits need to be decoded correctly?

Re: jeff millar > Hello all, > > What percentage of bits are needed to produce a valid decode? I'm asking > because sometimes I may start a transmit session some seconds late. This is a nice article including graphs about decoding probabilities vs timing:

Re: [wsjt-devel] What percentage of bits need to be decoded correctly?

Hi Jeff, You could answer all your questions, learning much more while doing so, by experimenting on your own. No need for RF; just use audio between two computers or two instances of WSJT-X on one computer. Having said that, I'll provide a few short answers: On 2/20/2021 8:38 AM, jeff

Re: [wsjt-devel] What percentage of bits need to be decoded correctly?

Hi Jeff Which mode are you asking about? Charlie G3WDG On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 14:44, jeff millar wrote: > Hello all, > > What percentage of bits are needed to produce a valid decode? I'm asking > because sometimes I may start a transmit session some seconds late. > > Does it make a difference

[wsjt-devel] What percentage of bits need to be decoded correctly?

Hello all, What percentage of bits are needed to produce a valid decode? I'm asking because sometimes I may start a transmit session some seconds late. Does it make a difference if the transmission is not started (Rx gets noise) vs started but changes message partway through? Sometimes I may