I would like to see a defined DX window also. Despite the WSJT-X magic ability
to separate signals the DX is often buried under the "locals".
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 13:59:23 -0400
Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> As Bill has explained, the WSJT-X Rx bandwidth is currently limited
Well, yes, but using split or fake-it you could be 100KHz off and still be
transmitting a perfect signal.
Didn't take long to get a 40M FT8 QSO at 3KHz this afternoon when the band was
essentially dead.
It all depends on the _other_ guys receive capabiltiies, and that's not
something we can
I agree getting newer equipment regularly can be a problem. However, I have
seen many PSK Reporter spots of my CQ’s at around 4kHz (channel Tx) so there
does seem to be stations that can handle that range - i always use split mode,
so that probably helps.
Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA
Joe,
Do actually want people to turn the dial? How arcane is that?
Jim KC7QY
On Friday, July 9, 2021, 12:02:36 PM MDT, Joe Taylor
wrote:
Hi Al,
As Bill has explained, the WSJT-X Rx bandwidth is currently limited to
5000 Hz. But I agree that larger FT8 sub-bands (or multiple
On 7/9/2021 10:59 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
As Bill has explained, the WSJT-X Rx bandwidth is currently limited to
5000 Hz. But I agree that larger FT8 sub-bands (or multiple sub-bands
on a given HF band) are really what is required to relieve congestion.
On 6M at least, our use of spectrum for
You guys should try EME lots of room.
Serge VE1KG
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2021 17:59
To: WSJT software development ; Al Pawlowski
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Message Bit to Request Other Station to QSY to your
Frequency
Hi Al,
As Bill has explained,
Hi Al,
As Bill has explained, the WSJT-X Rx bandwidth is currently limited to
5000 Hz. But I agree that larger FT8 sub-bands (or multiple sub-bands
on a given HF band) are really what is required to relieve congestion.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 7/9/2021 11:54 AM, Al Pawlowski wrote:
On 09/07/2021 16:54, Al Pawlowski wrote:
Given FT8’s growth, a built-in way to ask for a jump to an clear frequency, or
channel, certainly seems like a good idea. However, a larger channel is what
really seems to be needed. This could be accomplished (other mode user squawks
not considered)
> On Jul 9, 2021, at 9:54 AM, Al Pawlowski wrote:
>
> Though my rig can go to Hz rx BW and WSJTx v2.4.0 set to 6000Hz, 4500kHz
> is all I can get - above that, decodes stop and the waterfall fills with
> noise. I wonder if the limit is due to my CPU speed (usage increases with BW
> and
Given FT8’s growth, a built-in way to ask for a jump to an clear frequency, or
channel, certainly seems like a good idea. However, a larger channel is what
really seems to be needed. This could be accomplished (other mode user squawks
not considered) by just setting the WSJTx, and radio, rx
I am not JTDX user but happened just give help to one ham who uses it.
That guy was wondering why he sees just some decoded stations even when
waterfall seems to be full of them.
It seems to be that JTDX has some kind of internal filter that decodes
just a part of whole audio band. I do not
11 matches
Mail list logo
