On 22/07/2020 00:18, Russell Nieser wrote:
Mike,
First, I realize the TS-480 is not on your list.
I operate a TS-480SAT with Raspberry Pi 4B 2G, WSJT-x v2.2.2 and
CQRlog 2.3.0. It works fine with Settings: Radio Kenwood TS-4480, CAT
Control Serial Port /dev/tty/USB0, Baud 9600, PTT CAT,
Mike,
First, I realize the TS-480 is not on your list.
I operate a TS-480SAT with Raspberry Pi 4B 2G, WSJT-x v2.2.2 and CQRlog 2.3.0.
It works fine with Settings: Radio Kenwood TS-4480, CAT Control Serial Port
/dev/tty/USB0, Baud 9600, PTT CAT, etc.
Previously, I operated the same HW
On 19 Jul 2020 at 12:21, Bill Somerville wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I don't have a modern Icom with a USB connection, but I thought the
> "Unlink from REMOTE" option achieved what you require with using both
> CI-V bus connections simultaneously with one connection being passive.
Hi Bill, yes
There's another solution should work well.
What logging app are you using? If it supports hamlib (like Log4OM) there's
one solution, if not there's another solution via hamlib.
#1 You can use FLRig to control your rig
#2 Hook WSJT-X up to FLRig
#3 Run "rigctld -m 4 -vvv -Z" -- this will show
On 19/07/2020 12:02, Martin Davies G0HDB wrote:
On 18 Jul 2020 at 21:51, Bill Somerville wrote:
Hi Martin,
thanks for that information. Even if it does turn out to be the K9JM
CI-V router, that's useful information to have. Are you using it because
you have a PW-1?
Morning Bill, no I don't
On 18 Jul 2020 at 21:51, Bill Somerville wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> thanks for that information. Even if it does turn out to be the K9JM
> CI-V router, that's useful information to have. Are you using it because
> you have a PW-1?
Morning Bill, no I don't have a PW-1 so you might wonder why I've
On 18/07/2020 20:54, Martin Davies G0HDB wrote:
On 17 Jul 2020 at 15:15, Bill Somerville wrote:
Hi Martin,
thanks, that will be helpful. It would not be the first rig that doesn't
correctly apply "OR" logic to multiple sources of PTT.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
Hi again Bill, I've just got round to
On 17 Jul 2020 at 15:15, Bill Somerville wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> thanks, that will be helpful. It would not be the first rig that doesn't
> correctly apply "OR" logic to multiple sources of PTT.
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
Hi again Bill, I've just got round to repeating the tests with the
Icom's R-7100, the disowned orphan receiver, does correctly respond to set
and read frequency and mode commands.
73, Carey, WB4HXE
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 11:30 AM David Tiller
wrote:
> Ok, that’s what I thought. The PROII has those commands, of course. :-)
>
> So other than those things,
Ok, that’s what I thought. The PROII has those commands, of course. :-)
So other than those things, Hamlib works fine w/ the PRO, but I’ll do the
rigctl exhaustive test anyway.
> On Jul 18, 2020, at 10:50, Marco Calistri wrote:
>
> Il 16/07/20 01:11, Black Michael via wsjt-devel ha scritto:
Il 16/07/20 01:11, Black Michael via wsjt-devel ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm using this:
1021 Yaesu FT-100 20200323.0 Beta RIG_MODEL_FT100
And as we can see is still a Beta version.
It's working okay with WSJT-X but may be it can be enhanced.
Many thanks!
--
73 de Marco, PY1ZRJ (former IK5BCU)
On 7/16/20 at 12:11 AM, wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net (Black
Michael via wsjt-devel) wrote:
If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have
it working with WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report
working with WSJT-X please let me know.
Would like to promote as many of
On 17/07/2020 15:11, Martin Davies G0HDB wrote:
On 17 Jul 2020 at 14:38, Bill Somerville wrote:
Hi Martin,
is there an easy way to disconnect the hard wired PTT from your
interface, for a test? I ask because it seems like the IC-7610 appears
to be doing something odd when keyed both via a CAT
On 17 Jul 2020 at 14:38, Bill Somerville wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> is there an easy way to disconnect the hard wired PTT from your
> interface, for a test? I ask because it seems like the IC-7610 appears
> to be doing something odd when keyed both via a CAT command and via the
> ACC socket.
Hi
Mike - snip below is exactly my point about GUI consistency.
I also agree with Bill though, in that radio amateurs should be encouraged
to experiment rather than become appliance operators, hence my "half way
house" suggestions!
Alan G0TLK, sent from my mobile device
On 17 July 2020 14:27:35
Re: Black Michael
> If you have a bug to report please do. The problem the flag would address is
> people saying "X doesn't work" when it's known that the rig can't do X.
All the patches in the Debian package are already in the hamlib git
except for the typo fix that I just submitted as PR.
On 17/07/2020 14:33, Martin Davies G0HDB wrote:
On 16 Jul 2020 at 4:11, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working with
WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report working with WSJT-X please let me
know.
Would like to promote
Mike,
the settings GUI is shared by all rigs and is built before the rig
connection is opened. Any information that can only be determined by
querying the rig will greatly complicate that. For example say there was
a rig emulation using a rig model that has a USB-DATA mode but that
emulation
As the user it's a matter of GUI consistency.
Selecting the Funcube radio rightly greyed out the serial settings, a
noticeable GUI change. That leads the user to expect all the other
settings are default for the radio selected, but they aren't.
I didn't get the error warning until the main
On 16 Jul 2020 at 4:11, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
> If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working
> with WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report working with WSJT-X please
> let me know.
> Would like to promote as many of these to stable as possible and
Self-training and 100% knowledge of how everything is supposed to work are two
completely different things. Far too many people just click on things until it
works without any understanding of why and won't even ask the question. I have
talked to and helped well over 1,000 hams now and many of
If you have a bug to report please do. The problem the flag would address is
people saying "X doesn't work" when it's known that the rig can't do X.
There are only 2 bugs outstanding right now in Hamlib -- both of which should
be fixed today.
https://github.com/Hamlib/Hamlib/issues
Mike
Mike,
my Amateur Radio Licence clause 1(1)a says this:
"for the purpose of *self-training* in radio communications, including
conducting technical investigations"
My emphasis.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/07/2020 13:58, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
"Informed choices". I appreciate the
Re: Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> What I was referring to though was a flag that is "known" to be true. Perhaps
> for both for split and data/pkt. WSJT-X would default to enabled unless the
> the flag is present in either TRUE or FALSE state. And perhaps the tooltip
> on Split and Data/pkt
"Informed choices". I appreciate the humor.many ops have no idea what's
supposed to work
What I was referring to though was a flag that is "known" to be true. Perhaps
for both for split and data/pkt. WSJT-X would default to enabled unless the
the flag is present in either TRUE or
Hi Mike,
although it sounds attractive I think it will not work. There are too
many partial rig emulations out there to be sure if all advertized
features really work. The whole point of settings is for the user to
make informed choices based on their knowledge of their equipment, and
how
Bill..maybe WSJT-X could use the availability of the "rig_set_split" to
enable/disable the Rig split option?
And what do you think about adding a flag in hamlib for whether or not Data/Pkt
is supported for a rig so that could be enabled/disabled?
Mike W9MDB
On Friday, July 17, 2020,
25018 AMSAT-UK FUNcube Dongle Pro+ 20200112.0
Beta RIG_MODEL_FUNCUBEDONGLEPLUS
WSJT-X 2.2.2 works fine in FT8 mode, including changing bands, but with
some notes:
* I altered the main settings rather than create a new configuration,
by selecting the Funcube in
: Donnerstag, 16. Juli 2020 06:11
An: WSJT Software Development
Cc: Black Michael
Betreff: [wsjt-devel] Rig verification
If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working with
WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report working with WSJT-X please let me
know.
Would like to promote
8:09 AM
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Rig verification
>
> On 16/07/2020 05:11, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
>> If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working
>> w
Icom 7600 here, no issues, test ran perfectly.
From: Bill Somerville
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 8:09 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Rig verification
On 16/07/2020 05:11, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
If anybody has a rig out there that's
Software Development
Cc: Black Michael
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Rig verification
If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working with
WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report working with WSJT-X please let me
know.
Would like to promote as many of these to stable
WSJT-X 2.2.2 works fine with my FTDX-5000. Using Hamlib that came with
WSJT-X.
73,
Jim N6VH
On 7/15/2020 9:11 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working with
WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report working with
Yaesu 450D, no issues. Regards,Dave. Original message From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020, 05:11To: WSJT Software Development Cc: Black Michael Subject: [wsjt-devel] Rig verificationIf anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working
Hi Mike,
Using TS-790 in TS-711 works, but not properly.
Split operation > Rig = Key tune on - 2 seconds later rig beeps "U" for
usb, at 6'th second tx goes on. No rig qrg change.
Fake it, works immediately and has qrg change
Mode None, and split to rig, causes ~1,5 second delay on tx.
Works
If you try a TS-790 can you set split mode on the rig? We need to find out if
it's supported.
It hasn't been implemented for the TS-711 and I can't find a CAT manual for
that rig.
Mike W9MDB
On Thursday, July 16, 2020, 10:43:53 AM CDT, Jari A wrote:
TS-711 (2m multimode)
2.2.2
Looks very much like you have a copy of WSJT-X still running while trying the
install.
Reboot to ensure all wsjt-x processes stopped and re-try.
Tom
--
73
Tom
GM8MJV (IO85)
> On 16 Jul 2020, at 15:50, Frank Kirschner wrote:
>
> I'm using a Flex 6600 and wsjt-x v 2.1.0. When I select
No issues with the FT100
1021 Yaesu FT-100 20200323.0 Beta
RIG_MODEL_FT100
Tom
--
73
Tom
GM8MJV (IO85)
> On 16 Jul 2020, at 05:11, Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have
TS-711 (2m multimode)
2.2.2 , error if wstj-x setting is set for rig split. No matter if rig has
split on or off in the rig.
Setting, Split operation > Rig: Causes hamlib error.
If wsjt-x is set for Fake It, rig qrg follows wsjt-x control and changes tx
qrg according tx offset from wsjt-x
Bill,
Thanks. I thought I had done that, but apparently, there was something left
in memory. I rebooted, and it installed fine.
73,
Frank
KF6E
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:54 AM Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 16/07/2020 15:50, Frank Kirschner wrote:
>
> I'm using a Flex 6600 and wsjt-x v 2.1.0.
I got v 2.2.2 to install. Exhibits the same behavior. When "Rig" is
selected under Split Operation, wsjt-x crashes. The function seems to work
properly when I select Fake It, so this isn't a critical issue.
73,
Frank
KF6E
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:50 AM Frank Kirschner wrote:
> I'm using a
On 16/07/2020 15:50, Frank Kirschner wrote:
I'm using a Flex 6600 and wsjt-x v 2.1.0. When I select "Rig" as the
split mode, wsjt-x crashes. I thought it might be that I am using an
old version of wsjt-x, so I downloaded v.2.2.2. It won't install. I
get this error:
image.png
Running Win 7
I'm using a Flex 6600 and wsjt-x v 2.1.0. When I select "Rig" as the split
mode, wsjt-x crashes. I thought it might be that I am using an old version
of wsjt-x, so I downloaded v.2.2.2. It won't install. I get this error:
[image: image.png]
Running Win 7 64, i7 with 16 GB.
73,
Frank
KF6E
On
All,
I tested my IC-756PRO (no suffix) as described in the original email. All
worked as expected _except_ for setting the Data/PKT mode and the filter widths.
Observations:
MODE SETUP:
1) Expected behavior: If I have the radio in USB-DATA mode initially,
setting the mode to None does
TS-590SG is included but not TS-590S. However there are rig control issues
with TS-590S when using Commander and when using OmniRig. All have been
previously reported and all have been discussed in detail with Bill.
I abandoned using Commander with WSJT-X and have learned to live with the
; Can I recommend that if you are responding to Mike's call please specify if
>>> you are using "new" Hamlib source or if you are using packaged WSJTX source
>>> and/or distributions?
>>>
>>> If you need help please ask or post here or respond directly via email. If
Hi Mike and Fred,
there is a missing comma in Mike's example settings file.
Note that the automatic power on cannot be disabled in the current
WSJT-X version, it is the next version that will allow the feature to be
controlled. It will then be off by default. If there is demand for an
option
ly via email.
> If you need help compiling WSJTX for yourself then please peruse the JTSDK
> @ GROUPS.IO site at https://groups.io/g/JTSDK first [ Note: as I have
> been using it as a blog to help as many as I possibly can and to avoid
> repetition as many cannot post here du
aged WSJTX source
>> and/or distributions?
>>
>> If you need help please ask or post here or respond directly via email. If
>> you need help compiling WSJTX for yourself then please peruse the JTSDK @
>> GROUPS.IO site at https://groups.io/g/JTSDK first [ Note: as I
ere due to the lack of maintenance at that site ].
>
> HAM - Help All mankind. We are here to help and progress learning. I also hope that the intent of this post is clear and that it is to help.
>
> 73
>
> Steve I
> VK3VM / VK3SIR
>
> -Original Messa
ion
> as many cannot post here due to the lack of maintenance at that site ].
>
> HAM - Help All mankind. We are here to help and progress learning. I also
> hope that the intent of this post is clear and that it is to help.
>
> 73
>
> Steve I
> VK3VM / VK3SIR
&
On 16/07/2020 05:11, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working with
WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report working with WSJT-X please let me
know.
Would like to promote as many of these to stable as possible and WSJT-X is
].
>
> HAM - Help All mankind. We are here to help and progress learning. I also
> hope that the intent of this post is clear and that it is to help.
>
> 73
>
> Steve I
> VK3VM / VK3SIR
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Berg
> Sent: T
is clear and that it is to help.
73
Steve I
VK3VM / VK3SIR
-Original Message-----
From: Christoph Berg
Sent: Thursday, 16 July 2020 6:43 PM
To: Black Michael ; WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Rig verification
Re: Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> 3009 Icom
> 3010 Icom IC-706MkII 20200614.0
UntestedRIG_MODEL_IC706MKII
My 706MkII works fine.
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 05:17, Black Michael via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it
Re: Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> 3009 Icom IC-706 20200614.0
> Untested RIG_MODEL_IC706
My 706 (no mk something) works flawlessly.
(I used to get "rig communication problem" popups, but these are rare
now and I think the problem is in the USB
Hi Mike,
On 16.7.2020 7.11, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working with
WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report working with WSJT-X please let me
know.
Would like to promote as many of these to stable as possible and
On 16 Jul 2020 at 4:11, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
> If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working
> with WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report working with WSJT-X please
> let me know.
> Would like to promote as many of these to stable as possible and
Elecraft K3S works well with the program, no problems.
73
Jim Shepherd W6US
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Michael -
I used a FT-450 until very recently with WSJT-X and never once had an issue
with the rig interface. It was rock solid.
I possess a ID-5100, however it's a VHF/UHF FM rig, if there is a desire to
validate hamlib WSJT-X behaviors on it I could potentially do so, feel free
to contact me
Michael:
I have a FLEX 6400 and it works flawlessly with WSJT-X. Let me know if
there's anything else you need.
73
Al
W1JHU
On 7/16/2020 12:11 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working with
WSJT-X...or if you have
Mike
See below
On 7/16/2020 12:11 AM, Black Michael wrote:
If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working with
WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report working with WSJT-X please let me
know.
Would like to promote as many of these to stable as possible and
If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working with
WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report working with WSJT-X please let me
know.
Would like to promote as many of these to stable as possible and WSJT-X is one
of a couple programs that exercises a rig pretty
63 matches
Mail list logo
