The moderator there 'Roger' is a control freak, and very self sensitive.
Last week a poster had trouble decoding, and I referred him to time.is ,
however Roger completely misunderstood the relevance and arrogantly told
me to try the website myself,
if i wanted to know what result it
On Apr 24, 2023, at 7:49 AM, Martin Davies G0HDB via wsjt-devel
wrote:
>
> Commiserations, Jim, Willie and Virginia (and anyone else whose membership of
> the
> WSJT-X group on groups.io has been terminated!).
Martin,
Perhaps the moderation is at least partially automated, with people
On 23 Apr 2023 at 12:39, Jim Brown via wsjt-devel wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, what the original poster is requesting was
> implemented in the latest full release of JTDX. But since even the
> slightest mention of software other than WSJT-X results in getting
> bounced from the WSJT-X
In my radio filtered 48 kHz i/q stream (pairs of 28 bit samples) provided from
fpga (122.88 MHz on input) converted to 32bit floats processed by Weaver method
and can be routed trough 24 or 16 bit usb audio to wsjt. If wsjt not truncate
24 bit to 16 before processing, I can switch off AGC
I am amongst the most recent exiles. I mentioned that a current DXpedition may
be using one of WSJT-X variants - variant not named - running MSHV, so it would
probably be better to call that station using Normal mode instead of Hound mode.
Boom!
Anyway, the current state of the practical
Ditto, but I can’t be too fussed about it, I’ve got other forums to be helpful
on.
I hope the moderator of the groups.io forum for wsjt gets some time to
decompress. Moderating anything on the Internet nowadays is not a job I would
wish on my worst enemy.
73, Willie N1JBJ
> On Apr 23,
On 4/23/2023 11:20 AM, Daniel Uppström via wsjt-devel wrote:
Isn't that obvious why he wants more than 16 bits? With a receiver using
more than that it could be possible to eliminate AGC all together and
just feed something with 100 dB of dynamics into WSJT.
If I'm not mistaken, what the
Isn't that obvious why he wants more than 16 bits? With a receiver using
more than that it could be possible to eliminate AGC all together and
just feed something with 100 dB of dynamics into WSJT. That would be
great. But if the code is written such that it only uses 16 bits that
would of
