Sat, 6 Feb 2021 08:11:24 +0200
Saku kirjoitti:
> Yep!
>
> I have also boost-1.69.0-18.fc32.x86_64. Builds fine, but I think
> Jarmo means package install.
Yes
Allways read also the last message in the chain :)
Jarmo
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
Yep!
I have also boost-1.69.0-18.fc32.x86_64. Builds fine, but I think Jarmo
means package install.
Jeff Stillinger via wsjt-devel kirjoitti 6.2.2021 klo 4.12:
Using Boost 1.66 on SuSE Enterprise. Works just fine, builds without
error.
On 2/5/21 5:36 AM, jarmo wrote:
Has anyone managed
Using Boost 1.66 on SuSE Enterprise. Works just fine, builds without
error.
On 2/5/21 5:36 AM, jarmo wrote:
Has anyone managed install version 2.3.0 into F32?
2.3.0 has depencies to BOOST 1.73 and in F32
there is BOOST 1.69.
So anyone solved this?
Jarmo, oh1mrr
Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:24:27 +
g3vnc kirjoitti:
> On Linux Mint 19.3 I did $ sudo apt install libboost-all-dev as per
> the 2.3.0 User Guide and built 2.3.0 from source with no issues.
>
> The libboost-all-dev version that was installed from the repo is
> 1.65.1.0ubuntu1.
>
> Am I missing
On 05/02/2021 11:36, jarmo wrote:
Has anyone managed install version 2.3.0 into F32?
2.3.0 has depencies to BOOST 1.73 and in F32
there is BOOST 1.69.
So anyone solved this?
Jarmo, oh1mrr
On Linux Mint 19.3 I did $ sudo apt install libboost-all-dev as per the
2.3.0 User Guide and built 2.3.0
Fri, 5 Feb 2021 07:19:40 -0600
Richard Shaw kirjoitti:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=61383470
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
> KF5OIM
Tnx Richard
Jarmo
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:43 AM jarmo wrote:
> Has anyone managed install version 2.3.0 into F32?
> 2.3.0 has depencies to BOOST 1.73 and in F32
> there is BOOST 1.69.
> So anyone solved this?
>
I just kicked off the official Fedora build. I was working on the hamlib
4.1 release earlier.
