At 12:41 AM 8/18/2005, Tim Feltham wrote:
Is there any thought of adding a
8. WATIR for firefox?
Read #6 again:
6. defer invokation of COM calls until necessary
I've been pushing us this way for a while and believe that it is
more
important than ever. The simplest example of what this
To be more specific, Both xcom/mozilla and selenium are technologies that
will drive firefox.
At 12:41 AM 8/18/2005, Tim Feltham wrote:
Is there any thought of adding a
8. WATIR for firefox?
Read #6 again:
6. defer invokation of COM calls until necessary
I've been pushing us this way for
This code works for minimize and background IE browsers... Is there a
way to turn background on/off in the middle of a script??
require 'watir'
include Watir
class IE
def exists?
begin
@ie.hWnd== -1
return true
rescue
$ie.ie.visible = false
At 11:12 AM 8/18/2005, Peter Chau wrote:
This code works for minimize and background IE browsers... Is there a
way to turn background on/off in the middle of a script??
require 'watir'
include Watir
class IE
def exists?
begin
@ie.hWnd== -1
Michael
In our project, developers use watir for validating a build --
basically regression testing to demonstrate that the build is viable
and worthy of deploying in the test environment. Testers use a
disfferent tool. Their job is made simpler because they don't wate
time on a build that has one
Bugs item #2263, was opened at 2005-08-18 13:30
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=487aid=2263group_id=104
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Bret Pettichord (bret)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Table
How can I figure out (debug) what this complaint is about:
WIN32OLERuntimeError: focus
OLE error code:8000 in htmlfile
Unexpected call to method or property access.
HRESULT error code:0x80020009
Exception occurred.
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:3399:in
That works - but why doesn't the other work?
I've temporarily bypassed this particular problem by using the value=
method - just so I can get on with writing the test
On or about Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:13:38 -0500
Bret Pettichord [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote:
At 03:23 PM 8/18/2005, Warren
I am getting some
emailsreporting a couple of issues. The first is from folks trying to
install Watir with Ruby 182-15. They get an error message about the installer
not being able to find Fox. Looks like Fox is now installed as a Gem, so one
must also require rubygems in the installer. We
Bret Pettichord wrote:
7. make a gem
how could i forget -- kingsley is helping me with this.
To remind, I once submitted a gemspec for Watir. It was before there
were any native libraries in the distibution though. Anyway, Bret, if
you need help with a gem, just whistle :)
Alexey
Thanks for the reminder. I had searched my mail archive for your posts, but
i didn't think to search for all possible spellings of your name Mr.
Ver(k)hovsky.
At 10:33 PM 8/18/2005, Alex Verhovsky wrote:
Bret Pettichord wrote:
7. make a gem
how could i forget -- kingsley is helping me with
At 05:07 PM 8/18/2005, Warren Pollans wrote:
That works - but why doesn't the other work?
The object reference you stored becomes stale when a page loads or reloads.
The same thing will happen to the value= method.
I've temporarily bypassed this particular problem by using the value=
Bret Pettichord wrote:
I just installed Ruby 182-15 and then Watir 1.4 and did
not have any problems. All the unit tests (but the three frame tests --
a known issue) ran without problem. I did not need to add require
'rubygems'. I'm pretty sure that Fox was a gem in 182-14 as well.
The
Bret Pettichord wrote:
I just installed Ruby 182-15 and then Watir 1.4 and did
not have any problems. All the unit tests (but the three frame tests --
a known issue) ran without problem. I did not need to add require
'rubygems'. I'm pretty sure that Fox was a gem in 182-14 as well.
The
14 matches
Mail list logo
