On Sep 17, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
Following that epiphany I had at the end of my last email, here's what I'd
love to see everyone agree on, more or less:
Yes, but I'd like to expound it slightly differently. But basically, I like
this.
== Named Graphs
An RDF Named
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Sandro Hawke san...@w3.org wrote:
Following that epiphany I had at the end of my last email, here's what I'd
love to see everyone agree on, more or less:
== Named Graphs
An RDF Named Graph is similar to an RDF Graph, but different in one
important way.
Interesting thread.
...a named graph is a concrete thing which exemplifies the same
abstract structure as an RDF graph. Or, put another way, the RDF graph
is the syntactic structure of the actual object that is the named
graph. Just like a parse tree of a sentence written in a book.
... works
On 09/18/2013 04:29 AM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Sandro Hawke san...@w3.org
mailto:san...@w3.org wrote:
Following that epiphany I had at the end of my last email, here's
what I'd love to see everyone agree on, more or less:
== Named Graphs
An
(Sorry about late response, my web access has been spotty for the last few
days.)
On Sep 17, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
On 09/17/2013 02:33 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
(Aside. If I just hit reply to all on these messages, it automatically
includes public-rdf-comme...@w3.org, even
