bcc: public-html-admin
cc: www-archive
reply-to: www-archive.
Le 30 sept. 2013 à 06:45, Eric Whyne a écrit :
If I were a content provider I'd stay far away from it.
We all understand more or less the issues of DRM. We all have an opinion about
it (for and against). This doesn't solve
I am out of the office until 10/10/2013.
I am traveling for work with limited access to email.
Thanks,
Rich
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: EME is in the
scope of the HTML WG sent on 10/01/2013 7:03:58 AM.
This is the only notification you will receive while this
As Guus mentioned, we're out of time.
At this point I'm really liking Pat's plan [1] to leverage the term RDF
Source [2] to address the kinds of use cases we've been talking about,
and write a WG Note to explain how to do it and define a class of
Datasets (or Dataset Sources?) that are
I think my view is that the smallest amount of normative change to the text
that actually addresses my comment would be:
1: change in semantics concerning having interpretations that conform with the
named graph mapping of a dataset
2: change in semantics giving MAY or SHOULD or MUST force to
On 10/01/2013 02:16 PM, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
I think my view is that the smallest amount of normative change to the text
that actually addresses my comment would be:
1: change in semantics concerning having interpretations that conform with the
named graph mapping of a dataset
2: change in
I am happy either way, since the sentence is not that formal I saw no reason to
over-egg the correctness, and I preferred some slight readability: I see the
matter as editorial, and not one I am that concerned with.
I think your each is a clear improvement.
Since the term refer is not formally
Pat or Sandro,
Regarding this discussion:
[[
On 09/12/2013 12:33 AM, David Booth wrote:
[Let's move this discussion to www-archive@w3.org please, as it isn't
relevant to Jeremy's comment. All follow-ups there please.]
On 09/11/2013 10:32 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
[ . . . ]
But each IRI denotes
