On Dec 13, 2013, at 11:15 AM, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
Hi Pat,
I'll try to start with a summary of where I think we stand in this
discussion, and then follow with in-line responses:
David, you and I are not having a discussion. I have given up trying to explain
model theory to
On Nov 8, 2013, at 11:00 PM, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
Hi Pat,
Thanks very much for your excellent summary. Detailed responses below. (And
sorry it takes me so long to write these things up.)
On 10/31/2013 02:32 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
Hi David
Rather than respond
Hi Pat,
On 10/20/2013 04:31 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
David, greetings.
Most of what you write in this message is completely uncontroversial
and I would entirely agree with it. Rather than respond point by
point, let me try to summarize.
1. People who publish RDF (or indeed any other) content may
David, greetings.
Most of what you write in this message is completely uncontroversial and I
would entirely agree with it. Rather than respond point by point, let me try to
summarize.
1. People who publish RDF (or indeed any other) content may have different
ideas about what IRIs mean, and
Hi Pat,
On 10/10/2013 02:05 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
[ . . . ]
But, as I say, I now think that this idea, of trying to connect the
formal notions to an intuition, was probably a mistake in this
document and went against the spirit of a WG decision.
I don't know what was the WG decision, but
understand, but
model-theoretic semantics is one topic I really do have pretty thoroughly
grokked.
Thanks,
David
Original Message
Subject: Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to
interpretations (ISSUE-149)
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:06:19 -0700
,
David
Original Message
Subject: Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to
interpretations (ISSUE-149)
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:06:19 -0700
From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider pfpschnei...@gmail.com
To: David Booth da...@dbooth.org
CC: public-rdf-comments
to
go read a book???) That's both: (a) quite a projection; and (b)
*really* unfair and unhelpful. Fortunately I'm thick skinned and I have
a good sense of humor. :)
Thanks,
David
Original Message
Subject: Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped
