As Guus mentioned, we're out of time.
At this point I'm really liking Pat's plan [1] to leverage the term RDF
Source [2] to address the kinds of use cases we've been talking about,
and write a WG Note to explain how to do it and define a class of
Datasets (or Dataset Sources?) that are
I think my view is that the smallest amount of normative change to the text
that actually addresses my comment would be:
1: change in semantics concerning having interpretations that conform with the
named graph mapping of a dataset
2: change in semantics giving MAY or SHOULD or MUST force to
On 10/01/2013 02:16 PM, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
I think my view is that the smallest amount of normative change to the text
that actually addresses my comment would be:
1: change in semantics concerning having interpretations that conform with the
named graph mapping of a dataset
2: change in
