the Chairs of the changes.
Best,
- Ian
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:14 -0600, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
Bjoern,
I requested that Tim review your comments. I have not heard back from
him for several weeks and therefore plan to leave the current policy as
is at this time because Tim reviewed
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 14:46 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
It seems reasonable to assume that because
* they now use the old #005A9C blue instead of the new #083D94
(which would be a very bad idea, in my opinion)
005A9C is the official RGB of W3C blue
Hi Noah and Stuart,
Congrats on your recent TAG finding [1] The use of Metadata in URIs.
I had the pleasure of reading it today and found it very helpful.
I have a couple of comments that I thought I would send to you for
your consideration.
Best,
- Ian
1) I think it might be useful to list
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 01:19 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
Dear W3C Communications Team,
I would like to link to section 8.15 of the Odiferous Style Sheets 1.0
Recommendation from my OSS 1.0 Tutorial. In a few weeks it will turn out
that section has a major error, and a few months later
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 04:09 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
This has happened to me in practice. I don't think there's any
perfect solution (until the day we can do redirects with
fragids as Bert Bos has suggested [1]).
One idea: redirect the URI to section 8.15
Thank you, Dave, for this contribution. I would like to acknowledge
that the your contributing this material to W3C does not, in itself,
have any implications for Yahoo!, Inc. in terms of the W3C Patent
Policy.
Ian Jacobs, Head of W3C Communications
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 16:16 -0700, Dave
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 13:17 +0100, ~:'' ありがとうございました。
wrote:
Full Potential: Who's counting?
Ian,
Who is tasked with measuring and reporting on how or indeed whether
W3C is fulfilling it's stated objective?
Is this an external and independent body?
Where are their reports published?
Forwarded Message
From: Ian B. Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Publication moratorium in first half of 2008
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:06:58 +
Chairs,
There will one publishing moratorium in the first half of 2008
Forwarded Message
From: Ian B. Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Publication moratoria in second half of 2007
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:41:28 +
Chairs,
There will be two publication blackout periods in the second half
of 2007. Please take
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 22:05 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Hi,
Why is public-new-work-comments subscribed to public-new-work? This way I
get all the e-mails twice. Since public-new-work-comments doesn't get much
e-mail at all and public-new-work is low traffic maybe it would be better
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 20:09 +, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 22:05 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Hi,
Why is public-new-work-comments subscribed to public-new-work? This way I
get all the e-mails twice. Since public-new-work-comments doesn't get much
e-mail
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 22:03 +, fantasai wrote:
Hi Fantasai,
I have only a couple of comments, and not ones that address your
main requests.
You've updated the license grant form under the old URL.
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/testgrants2-200409/?login
I hope you're keeping track
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 21:22 +0100, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:
Ian
What action has been taken in the past nine months to commission an
external review?
None, to my knowledge.
_ Ian
regards
my logo
Jonathan Chetwynd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.openicon.org/
+44 (0) 20 7978
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 19:42 +1100, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Hi Ian.
One of the rules in pubrules is that the copyright information must
use very particular markup. I was wondering if this could be relaxed in
two ways.
Hi Cameron,
First, it would be good if I could use the “©” and “™”
14 matches
Mail list logo
