On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Gour g...@gour-nitai.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:15:00 -0800
Conal == Conal Elliott wrote:
Hello Conal,
Conal I've worked with both wxhaskell and gtk2hs. I prefer wxhaskell
Conal for elegant design. And I like that it gives me a native Mac OS
Hiya!
Haskell noob considering to write desktop gui app by developing on
Linux...
Moreover, I'd like the application to be multi-platform and to be
nicely supported on Mac OS X and finally (the least priority) on
Windows.
For long time I was considering gtk2hs (yeah, I'm 'learning' Haskell
too
Hiya!
Haskell noob considering to write desktop gui app by developing on
Linux...
Moreover, I'd like the application to be multi-platform and to be
nicely supported on Mac OS X and finally (the least priority) on
Windows.
For long time I was considering gtk2hs (yeah, I'm 'learning' Haskell
too
Hi Gour,
2010/1/19 Gour g...@gour-nitai.com
Now, based on what I know so far wxhaskell may be better supported on
Mac since GTK+ port is not finished. otoh, I'm a bit concerned about
Since the core interface is generated automatically from the wxEiffel
binding... and visiting the project
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:35:08 +
Jeremy == jeremy.odonoghue-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org
wrote:
Hiya Jeremy,
Jeremy I'm not sure where you found this quote. A (small) team of
Jeremy developers took on maintenance of wxHaskell over three years
Jeremy ago, and we have been
