Re: [X2Go-User] Web browser performance over X2Go

web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) > 246-6874. > On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Stefan Seidel wrote: > > Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:11:53 +0200 > > From: Stefan Seidel < ssei...@vub.de > > > To: Jordan Sokolic < jor...@twiggle.com > > > Cc: x2g

Re: [X2Go-User] Web browser performance over X2Go

assistance, not telephone trees or script > > > readers. See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or > (800) > > > 246-6874. > > > On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Stefan Seidel wrote: > > > > Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:11:53 +0200 > > > > F

Re: [X2Go-User] Web browser performance over X2Go

://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874. On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Stefan Seidel wrote: Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:11:53 +0200 From: Stefan Seidel <ssei...@vub.de> To: Jordan Sokolic <jor...@twiggle.com> Cc: x2go-user@lists.x2go.org Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] Web browser performance o

Re: [X2Go-User] Web browser performance over X2Go

Hi Jordan, Firefox 47 disabled XRender support by default. Go to about:settings and search for xrender, set the property to true. That made it a lot better for me. Stefan > Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:34:32 +0300 > From: Jordan Sokolic > To: x2go-user@lists.x2go.org >

Re: [X2Go-User] Web browser performance over X2Go

Hi, Unfortunately setting MOZ_DISABLE_IMAGE_OPTIMIZE=1 did not make a difference. Thanks though. On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Ulrich Sibiller wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Jordan Sokolic > wrote: > > I should have probably mentioned that this

Re: [X2Go-User] Web browser performance over X2Go

I should have probably mentioned that this lag also occurs when running the X2Go client directly on the server itself, so it doesn't seem to be an issue with the WAN link, Windows 10, etc. For the sake of comparison I ran Firefox 48.0 via X2Go on another machine on the same 100Mbit LAN as the

Re: [X2Go-User] Web browser performance over X2Go

I wonder if the issue isn't specific to Windows 10, I am using Firefox 50, the development version, on a Ubuntu 16.04 workstation (an old Mac Pro 1,1 with Ubuntu 16.04 64 bit) and I do not see any issues with lag.