On 11 April 2012 23:38, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
Le mercredi 11 avril 2012, à 15:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
In Fedora, we've had the issue where some desktop files were incorrectly
shipped with a vendor prefix. Due to the fact that the file name often
is used as a
Is it just me or is there no human readable version of the xembed spec
available?
http://standards.freedesktop.org/xembed-spec/ does not contain any
document that can be rendered in the browser.
Cheers,
Mikkel
___
xdg mailing list
On 2 March 2012 14:36, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le vendredi 02 mars 2012, à 11:03 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen a écrit :
Is it just me or is there no human readable version of the xembed spec
available?
http://standards.freedesktop.org/xembed-spec/ does not contain any
On 2 November 2011 13:19, Kevin Krammer kevin.kram...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, 2011-11-01, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
Hi,
The latest tickets in what's been a recurring item for our application
search in Ubuntu is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/883800
On 1 November 2011 19:31, Ted Gould t...@gould.cx wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 14:15 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
So keeping it to a problem that we can easily solve a user proposed
something that I also think the upstream app authors wouldn't mind:
Introducing a new XDG category
Hi,
The latest tickets in what's been a recurring item for our application
search in Ubuntu is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/883800. It
basically boils down to the fact that you may not want PornView (or
other adult apps) popping up as you type a search during a
On 1 November 2011 16:11, Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote:
On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 08:15:15 AM Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
Hi,
The latest tickets in what's been a recurring item for our application
search in Ubuntu is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity
On 13 November 2010 23:28, Lennart Poettering mz...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Sat, 13.11.10 23:12, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen (mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com)
wrote:
It's not totally clear from the discussions on this list, what kind of
items you intend to go in XDG_USER_DIR? As I read it we
On 14 November 2010 02:09, Oswald Buddenhagen o...@kde.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:28:08PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 13.11.10 23:12, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
(mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'd rather like something more deterministic. When there are no
file
On 6 November 2010 23:03, Lennart Poettering mz...@0pointer.de wrote:
Heya,
Ryan Lortie and I have been sitting down here at the GNOME Summit and
have discussed an older proposal that was posted on the XDG ML by Ryan a
while back, regarding definition of a directory where user applications
2009/12/17 Aurélien Gâteau aurelien.gat...@canonical.com:
Hi,
A few months ago, Marco Martin proposed a new specification to
freedesktop.org [1] (at this time it was named NotificationItem, it has
since then be renamed to StatusNotifier to avoid confusion with the
existing Notification
2010/1/14 Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com:
On Thursday 14 January 2010, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
2009/12/17 Aurélien Gâteau aurelien.gat...@canonical.com:
Hi,
A few months ago, Marco Martin proposed a new specification to
freedesktop.org [1] (at this time it was named
2009/12/17 Aurélien Gâteau aurelien.gat...@canonical.com:
Hi,
A few months ago, Marco Martin proposed a new specification to
freedesktop.org [1] (at this time it was named NotificationItem, it has
since then be renamed to StatusNotifier to avoid confusion with the
existing Notification
Hi world,
After many delays and flamewars I am very proud to announce the first
stable version of the Xesam specification. You can read the
specification online at: http://xesam.org (direct link:
http://xesam.org/main/Xesam100). Unfortunately there are no PDFs up
yet, I am working on this.
This
2009/4/23 Ted Gould t...@gould.cx:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 23:11 +0200, Olivier Goffart wrote:
Doesnn't the fact that this service is required show a flaw in dbus itself.
Is there a way to ask dbus all the running client that provides a given
interface?
I know nothing of DBus other than the
Just did a quick review of the Thumbnailer spec on
http://live.gnome.org/ThumbnailerSpec as of today. Overall it seems
good, but I have a few comments+questions.
* It took me two reads to grok the interplay between Queue and
Unqueue. It is elegant I give you that, but it could be explained
2008/9/7 Philip Van Hoof [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 13:47 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
* Why do each specialized thumbnailer has its own interface name? Ie
com.mikkel.Thumbnailer? Since the interface is defined by the
thumbnailer spec anyway, why is the name
2008/9/7 Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Under which circumstances does the methods throw errors and when do
they silently fail?
- What happens if I Queue the file [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
- Unqueuing a non
Hi all,
I am pleased to announce that I rolled Release Candidate 2 of the Xesam
Search Spec. It is available from http://xesam.org.
The release cycle was *much* longer than what I had aimed for, but life got
in the way. In short, nothing exiting happened in this cycle (which is a
good thing!). A
On 17/09/2007, Anders Rune Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I've been reading the Xesam Query Language specification and I have a
questions:
1) How do I get all tags for all files? Preferable as listname,
count. The same is true for other attributes such as mime-types.
This boarders on
On 18/02/2008, Jamie McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:23 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
On 17/09/2007, Anders Rune Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I've been reading the Xesam Query Language specification and I have a
questions:
1) How
On 09/02/2008, Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 16:04 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
On 09/02/2008, Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 09:22 +0200, Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes wrote:
[...]
At the end of the day not so many
On 09/02/2008, Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 09:22 +0200, Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes wrote:
[...]
At the end of the day not so many people will write this format by
hand.
A question, though -- how does this work if markup is needed in
names, e.g. for Ruby? Or
Hi all,
I just want to inform you that a separate Xesam mailing list has been set
up. Surprisingly called xesam, hosted here on FDO. In the future
announcements (like the upcomming, and hopefully final, Search spec RC2)
will still go here, but main discussion will go on the xesam list.
So jump
2007/10/23, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/10/23, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
On 10/23/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As the subject says, XESAM RC1 is out, much later than I had
hoped, but well - if you want the bad excuses
2007/10/23, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
On 10/23/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the subject says, XESAM RC1 is out, much later than I had
hoped, but well - if you want the bad excuses read my blog. Let me
talk a little before I give you the link
Hi all,
As the subject says, XESAM RC1 is out, much later than I had hoped, but well
- if you want the bad excuses read my blog. Let me talk a little before I
give you the link to the spec.
As you may know we have an age old project request[1] up on FDO bugzilla.
This plus the horribly slow wiki
2007/9/28, Arun Raghavan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Sorry about the delated response.
On 9/26/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will be the last batch of changes before we call RC1 (modulo
upcoming
ontology update). As usual you can find the proposed items
2007/9/26, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 9/26/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will be the last batch of changes before we call RC1 (modulo
upcoming
ontology update). As usual you can find the proposed items on
http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki
Cheers all,
First of all sorry for the delay. Second - BE SURE TO REVIEW THESE CHANGES
IF YOU HAVE ANY INTEREST IN XESAM.
This will be the last batch of changes before we call RC1 (modulo upcoming
ontology update). As usual you can find the proposed items on
2007/9/20, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
On 9/18/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that Strigi has some work in, but I am not sure how far they are
(they share a XESAM query parser with Pinot (part of the Dijon project
on
berlios)).
Strigi
2007/9/17, Anders Rune Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
I've been reading the Xesam Query Language specification and I have a
questions:
1) How do I get all tags for all files? Preferable as listname,
count. The same is true for other attributes such as mime-types.
You are right that there
2007/9/17, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Sorry for the delay in replying to this.
On 9/13/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been discussing with Evgeny on IRC, and we agreed that it should be
possible to compile XESAM 1.0 RC1 spec for this sunday (2007-09-16
2007/9/14, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 01:01 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
Man I love speaking to myself :-) Anyways, I just completed (4). Check
it out at http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamQueryLanguage and
gimme the flames...
(I'm not involved
2007/9/14, Arun Raghavan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 9/14/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Man I love speaking to myself :-) Anyways, I just completed (4). Check
it
out at http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamQueryLanguage
and gimme the flames...
Looks good!
One
Hi all,
I've been discussing with Evgeny on IRC, and we agreed that it should be
possible to compile XESAM 1.0 RC1 spec for this sunday (2007-09-16).
Here are the missing pieces that needs to be settled before sunday:
1.1) Evgeny has a few updates for the ontology that will be merged;
2007/9/13, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/9/13, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I've been discussing with Evgeny on IRC, and we agreed that it should be
possible to compile XESAM 1.0 RC1 spec for this sunday (2007-09-16).
Here are the missing
2007/8/13, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/8/13, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I updated http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamSearchUpdates with the
conclusions of the discussions. I'll merge it to the spec tonight or
tomorrow. If you want a last minute
I updated http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamSearchUpdates with the
conclusions of the discussions. I'll merge it to the spec tonight or
tomorrow. If you want a last minute change, then this is the last call
for changes in this round.
Cheers,
Mikkel
2007/8/13, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I updated http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamSearchUpdates with the
conclusions of the discussions. I'll merge it to the spec tonight or
tomorrow. If you want a last minute change, then this is the last call
for changes in this round
2007/8/10, Luca Dionisi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/10/07, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 10 August 2007 13:25:09 Luca Dionisi wrote:
Is it possible with the Xesam API to search within results
à la Google or even better?
I mean, will I be able, with a Xesam
2007/8/8, Thiago Macieira [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
In any case, we're discussing null types in D-Bus itself. This will
probably require a new major message version...
So using the 'correct' 'bv' is faster. That is interesting. Especially
since quite a few
2007/8/7, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 09:29:51 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
2. Type Attribute in Query Language
I agree with Jamie that usually people will just enumerate categories
in
which
to search, without any complex criterias
2007/8/8, Jos van den Oever [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/8/7, Thiago Macieira [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Neither solution is a problem with QtDBus. The bv solution would
generate larger messages, but faster parsing (QtDBus delays decoding of
variants until actual use).
In any case, we're discussing
2007/8/4, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On 8/3/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been collecting comments on the Xesam spec lately, and I think we
have
enough now to do an update round of the spec proposal.
Proposed changes can be found here:
http
Hi all,
I've been collecting comments on the Xesam spec lately, and I think we have
enough now to do an update round of the spec proposal.
Proposed changes can be found here:
http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamSearchUpdates
Please report back asap. Cheers,
Mikkel
Hi again,
I have a few suggestions for updates to the xesam search spec.
* API:
Remove the session properties search.blocking and search.live. These seemed
to cause more confusion than I anticipated. These can be emulated in the
client side lib as far as my scribblings can tell. Anoter solution
2007/6/27, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 02:45:15 John Tapsell wrote:
Hi all,
First time caller, long time listener... :-)
At the risk of being stupid, from this diagram audio files have
frameRate and frameCount info, no? This doesn't seem right.
Hi all,
As warned I have implemented the changes as per
http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamSearchUpdates
The API change I shout about in the subject line is the fact that the method
StartSearch have been added so that you now have to issue this call to start
the search created by NewSearch.
2007/6/22, Jos van den Oever [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/6/17, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/6/17, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/6/16, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
While hacking on xesam-tools[1] I have struck a few
2007/6/20, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/20/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Specify that I want to use a signal SearchDone when the index has
been searched
I am not sure I understand. If the search is live, how can it ever be done ?
People may think
2007/6/16, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
While hacking on xesam-tools[1] I have struck a few problems in the
current spec and I think we should settle them asap.
Please have a look at http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamSearchUpdatesand
gimme some feedback
2007/6/17, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/6/16, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
While hacking on xesam-tools[1] I have struck a few problems in the
current spec and I think we should settle them asap.
Please have a look at
http
Hi all,
While hacking on xesam-tools[1] I have struck a few problems in the current
spec and I think we should settle them asap.
Please have a look at
http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/XesamSearchUpdatesand gimme some
feedback.
Cheers,
Mikkel
[1]: Btw xesam-tools-0.3 is out -
2007/6/10, Jos van den Oever [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/6/10, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Xesames and xdg subscribers,
Our project creation request[1] has been stalled for almost four months
now.
I really don't think we can keep on abusing the xdg list anymore
2007/6/10, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We need to agree on a consistent Source naming.
Source-Source Item examples:
Filesystem -File
Archive -ArchiveItem
Email -Attachment
It seems resonable to adopt either:
* this is contained in a
2007/6/11, Jos van den Oever [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/6/11, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/6/10, Jos van den Oever [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/6/10, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Xesames and xdg subscribers,
Our project creation request[1] has been
2007/6/11, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 11 June 2007 17:19:08 Antoni Mylka wrote:
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen pisze:
In this setup I think source is a misleading word, but I can't think
of anything better right now (I think there must be at least 30C in
the
office, my
2007/6/11, Dave Cridland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon Jun 11 12:29:10 2007, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
- Filesystem : The object data is stored on the fs
This one I understand. But does it count only if it's a local
filesystem? Or only one that's mounted?
Well, it might be an idea
2007/6/9, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Source attached. Cute picture:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/PhreedomDraft?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=viz.png
Great work. This is really starting to look like something.
--
Design decisions proposed:
Split ontology into
2007/6/10, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sunday 10 June 2007 12:20:48 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
2007/6/9, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Source attached. Cute picture:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/PhreedomDraft?action=AttachFiledo=viewt
arget=viz.png
Great
Hi Xesames and xdg subscribers,
Our project creation request[1] has been stalled for almost four months now.
I really don't think we can keep on abusing the xdg list anymore, and as it
appears we are not going to get a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list I think we have
to move our business elsewhere if
2007/6/8, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 08 June 2007 09:05:19 you wrote:
I just wanna toss this idea out in the wild.
I want to make it easy to have multiple services expose a xesam search
interface. We would still have the standard desktop search engine with
the
2007/6/8, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 08 June 2007 17:53:22 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
Another point: many ontologies can co-exist with the aid of namespacing.
You
can lump together results from queries to any number of indexers, and
it'll
work just fine
I just want to sum up the discussion from last night on #xesam.
We discussed the recent proposal of having Category and Source be single
valued fields that both imply the meaningful fields on an object.
This to (some extend) requires us to have multiple inheritance for
categories (not
2007/6/7, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 07 June 2007 17:23:16 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
2007/6/7, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/7/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To ease the query expansion on the servers each Category
will have
I just wanna toss this idea out in the wild.
I want to make it easy to have multiple services expose a xesam search
interface. We would still have the standard desktop search engine with the
dbus path and name as specified, but other implementations of the search
interface could be useful too.
2007/6/6, jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 16:37 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
I've been bugging about trying to figure out how we can please
everyone with regards to categories and sources.
There seem to be consensus on the following: Each object has two
designated
2007/6/5, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 02:18:21 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
2007/6/5, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 00:25:45 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
2007/5/30, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all
2007/5/30, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I'd like you to take a look at the ontology sketch
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/PhreedomDraft?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=viz.png
How about a field that states the application that created the object in the
first place, or is
2007/6/6, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On 6/5/07, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:33:55 Fabrice Colin wrote:
On 6/3/07, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant handling thumbnails of files. Strigi has a thumbnail field
for
files. Not
2007/5/30, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I'd like you to take a look at the ontology sketch
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/PhreedomDraft?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=viz.png
It's not complete. Some fields/classes are dropped intentionally.
I'd like to hear some feedback
2007/6/5, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 00:25:45 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
2007/5/30, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I'd like you to take a look at the ontology sketch
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/PhreedomDraft?action
2007/6/1, Antoni Mylka [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen pisze:
* contributor (DC)
* creator (DC)
* description (DC)
* language (DC)
* publisher (DC)
* subject (DC)
* title (DC)
* license (an extensible vocabulary with predefined values GPL, LPGL,
MIT etc)
* uri
2007/5/30, jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 18:51 +0300, Evgeny Egorochkin wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like you to take a look at the ontology sketch
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/PhreedomDraft?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=viz.png
It's not complete. Some fields/classes are
2007/5/31, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 17:27:46 jamie wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:50 +0300, Evgeny Egorochkin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 12:50:24 Antoni Mylka wrote:
Hello phreedom,
For those of you who don't know me I'm currently working on
2007/5/30, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry forgot the most important part :)
Hi all,
I'd like you to take a look at the ontology sketch
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/PhreedomDraft?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=viz.png
Thanks for the effort. I like the big
2007/5/21, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wednesday 2007-05-23, 17:00 UTC (19:00 CET) at irc://FreeNode/#xesam.
The meeting will focus on how to get something concrete down to ensure
that the metadata-spec moves on.
I will post an agenda tomorrow. Please chime in if you have any
2007/5/21, Sebastian Trüg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 21 May 2007 00:47:21 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
2007/5/16, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It was evident from the last meeting that we are badly in need of a
meeting where more search engines are represented
2007/5/19, Jos van den Oever [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I was rereading the xesam-query.xsd and have the following remarks about
it.
- There is no target namespace. This must be fixed before it becomes
final.
- The attribute 'type' on query is redundant since one also use a
selection for it.
2007/5/20, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I would like to request a change to the Xesam Query Language.
The schema at http://grillbar.org/xesam/drafts/xesam-query.xsd defines
xs:complexType name=selectProximityType
xs:complexContent
xs:extension base=selectBaseType
2007/5/21, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/5/19, Jos van den Oever [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I was rereading the xesam-query.xsd and have the following remarks about
it.
- There is no target namespace. This must be fixed before it becomes
final.
- The attribute 'type
Wednesday 2007-05-23, 17:00 UTC (19:00 CET) at irc://FreeNode/#xesam.
The meeting will focus on how to get something concrete down to ensure that
the metadata-spec moves on.
I will post an agenda tomorrow. Please chime in if you have any points you
want to put up on the meeting.
IMPORTANT: RDF
2007/5/21, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hey,
On 5/20/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. That was not entirely thought through. I must admit that I find
http://beagle-project.org/Writing_clients a bit confusing
though.
Ah, I hadn't actually read that page.
As far
2007/5/21, jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 21:43 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
5) And a bigger issue, that is a tough call... Should we use
real dbus
objects for sessions/searches? According to Havoc Pennington
2007/5/18, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 18 May 2007 12:27:30 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
* should we allow for multiple inheritance (ie multiple parents for
fields)?
I believe there were two issues intermixed: multiple parents for
fields
and
multiple types
2007/5/18, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 18 May 2007 09:22:30 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
* It was brought up again whether this category system should be
independent or dependent on the field definitions. Again we where
split
in
two camps. Strigi/Nepomuk
2007/5/18, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On 5/18/07, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you provide a more concrete example of why you can't e.g. define a
Object.HitType field instead to provide the same functionality?
Oh, there's no reason why you can't. In fact, this is
2007/5/18, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'll offer a drink to the hero who will create the xesam mailing list
:-)
(And you'll help solve part of
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10114)
I shall chip in as well. I will send a 0.7L Maisel's Weisse to the one
creating the xesam
2007/5/19, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Saturday 19 May 2007 14:37:57 you wrote:
2007/5/18, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 18 May 2007 12:27:30 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
* should we allow for multiple inheritance (ie multiple parents
for fields
2007/5/19, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On 5/19/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would the HitType/FileType structure of Beagle not be implicit with a
Category structure like this:
http://www.grillbar.org/xesam/object-tree.png (this is not
the old example again
2007/5/16, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It was evident from the last meeting that we are badly in need of a
meeting where more search engines are represented. This basically boils down
to Pinot, Recoll and Beagle devs. Please chime in with date+time proposals
ASAP (this also
2007/5/17, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On 5/17/07, jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EG Video would be a subclass of File and Web Bookmark a subclass
of Bookmark etc (this is the rdf or triple store way of doing things)
I think in your case Hit type are the top level parents and File type
2007/5/17, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 5/16/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MEETING:
* It was proposed that we had a platform independent libxesam with the
core
non-dbus related utilities such as query parsing and query construction.
It
was the general
2007/5/17, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 14:22:50 Fabrice Colin wrote:
* It was brought up again whether this category system should be
independent or dependent on the field definitions. Again we where
split
in two camps. Strigi/Nepomuk arguing that the
2007/5/17, jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 15:16 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On 5/16/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was evident from the last meeting that we are badly in need of a
meeting
where more search engines are represented. This basically
2007/5/18, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 5/18/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/5/17, jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
how about next monday at 18:00 utc?
This would be 24:00 for Fabrice... Maybe we could start at 17:00 utc,
but
that might be too early for Joe
2007/5/16, Evgeny Egorochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 17:24:57 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
It was evident from the last meeting that we are badly in need of a
meeting
where more search engines are represented. This basically boils down to
Pinot, Recoll and Beagle devs
Here are the minutes of our meeting yesterday (2007-05-15). Sorry it is a
bit short, but my time is limited...
ATTENDING: Gunnar (nepomuk), Sebastian (nepomuk), Jamie (tracker), Jos
(strigi), Evgeny (strigi), Mikkel (vigilante ninja)
AGENDA:
* libxesam, libxesam-{glib,qt}
- should we
It was evident from the last meeting that we are badly in need of a meeting
where more search engines are represented. This basically boils down to
Pinot, Recoll and Beagle devs. Please chime in with date+time proposals ASAP
(this also goes to devs of other engines).
What we need to discuss in
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
