Re: XDG_DATA_HOME vs XDG_STATE_HOME usage

2022-09-12 Thread Josef Šimánek
út 13. 9. 2022 v 1:57 odesílatel Thiago Macieira napsal: > > On Monday, 12 September 2022 16:22:32 PDT Josef Šimánek wrote: > > Would you recommend XDG_STATE_HOME then? It seems it fits the best. > > Sync across machines for this file really depends on user preference. > > Sometimes it makes

Re: XDG_DATA_HOME vs XDG_STATE_HOME usage

2022-09-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 12 September 2022 16:22:32 PDT Josef Šimánek wrote: > Would you recommend XDG_STATE_HOME then? It seems it fits the best. > Sync across machines for this file really depends on user preference. > Sometimes it makes sense, sometimes not. Is this a notification the user may dismiss? If

Re: XDG_DATA_HOME vs XDG_STATE_HOME usage

2022-09-12 Thread Josef Šimánek
út 13. 9. 2022 v 0:40 odesílatel Thiago Macieira napsal: > > On Monday, 12 September 2022 15:26:49 PDT Josef Šimánek wrote: > > Anyway, is that the decision maker for XDG_DATA_HOME vs > > XDG_STATE_HOME? Synced vs not synced between machines? > > No. It should be about the nature of the data. > >

Re: XDG_DATA_HOME vs XDG_STATE_HOME usage

2022-09-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 12 September 2022 15:26:49 PDT Josef Šimánek wrote: > Anyway, is that the decision maker for XDG_DATA_HOME vs > XDG_STATE_HOME? Synced vs not synced between machines? No. It should be about the nature of the data. https://specifications.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/latest/ar01s03.html

Re: XDG_DATA_HOME vs XDG_STATE_HOME usage

2022-09-12 Thread Josef Šimánek
út 13. 9. 2022 v 0:12 odesílatel Thiago Macieira napsal: > > On Monday, 12 September 2022 14:39:26 PDT Josef Šimánek wrote: > > This file is portable between systems, since the whole content is just > > a number (UNIX timestamp). It is not crucial to the user, but it is > > beneficial to sync

Re: XDG_DATA_HOME vs XDG_STATE_HOME usage

2022-09-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 12 September 2022 14:39:26 PDT Josef Šimánek wrote: > This file is portable between systems, since the whole content is just > a number (UNIX timestamp). It is not crucial to the user, but it is > beneficial to sync this across machines to avoid potentially redundant > update