Hallo,
today I downloaded several pdf-files from scientific journals.
Controlling the mime-type, some of them were application/PDF, some were
text/plain. The first bits of the files are similar: %PDF- which is the
magic key word for application/pdf.
A bug report has already been filed: #6577.
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 15:39 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
today I downloaded several pdf-files from scientific journals.
Controlling the mime-type, some of them were application/PDF, some
were
text/plain. The first bits of the files are similar: %PDF- which is
the
magic key word for
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 18:18 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
Because you are an excellent testing volunteer/victim, I'd like you to
raise the PDF matchlet priority over 50 (so that it is preferred over
the single-character '%' matchlets for MATLAB and TeX, and report back
whether after running
Am Dienstag, den 25.04.2006, 21:14 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
Am Dienstag, den 25.04.2006, 14:43 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
/usr/share/mime/packages/freedesktop.org.xml
After editing that file, rerun update-desktop-database
update-mime-database /usr/share/mime
is probably
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:04:57 +, Mike Hearn wrote:
Current issues keeping this as 'draft' are:
* The Desktop Base Directory Specification, which this relies on, is
still a draft.
Can we add:
* Integration with icon themes has not been finalised
(and is not
Bastien Nocera writes:
Kjartan was pestering me this morning for a shared-mime-info release, so
I bit the bullet and released 0.17!
Only 2 years until the next release :)
But it seems that many patches from Bugzilla are missing:
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:19 +0100, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Bastien Nocera writes:
Kjartan was pestering me this morning for a shared-mime-info release, so
I bit the bullet and released 0.17!
Only 2 years until the next release :)
But it seems that many patches from Bugzilla are
I guess that you forgot to CC: the list, so doing that now.
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 16:07 +, John Tapsell wrote:
Hi,
Could you please put on the wiki what the status of this proposal
is. What release of Gnome/KDE use it? Or is it only the distro's
What proposal?
that should care?
Hi Bastien,
Huh. It's a software announcement. Pretty much every Free Unix desktop
project uses it, and distros and users should probably all upgrade to
that version...
Okay. You know that. Most people here know that. Yet if you go to
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Standards it's under:
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:05, John Tapsell wrote:
Draft specifications that are new and not yet widely used, though
they may be used by one or more desktops or desktop applications:
With no indication anywhere whether everyone uses it or nobody uses.
did you see my recent posting to this
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:05:05 +, John Tapsell wrote:
Hi Bastien,
Huh. It's a software announcement. Pretty much every Free Unix desktop
project uses it, and distros and users should probably all upgrade to
that version...
Okay. You know that. Most people here know that. Yet if you
Current issues keeping this as 'draft' are:
* The Desktop Base Directory Specification, which this relies on, is
still a draft.
Can we add:
* Integration with icon themes has not been finalised
(and is not currently part of the specification).
to that list? :)
It's
12 matches
Mail list logo
