Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-24 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
2007/2/23, Magnus Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:26:26 +0800 Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/23/07, Magnus Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What gstreamer does is to set up a pipeline for handling media streams in a very generic way. The pipeline consists of

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-23 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:57:43 +0800 Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/23/07, Magnus Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't checked dijon yet and might have missed something. I assume filtering refers to converting documents into formats that indexers can understand (usually

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-23 Thread Fabrice Colin
On 2/23/07, Magnus Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What gstreamer does is to set up a pipeline for handling media streams in a very generic way. The pipeline consists of a source element, any number of filter elements and a sink element (which could be an indexer of a document viewer). There

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-22 Thread Fabrice Colin
On 2/23/07, Magnus Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't checked dijon yet and might have missed something. I assume filtering refers to converting documents into formats that indexers can understand (usually plain text and XML), right? Yes, that's right. Why not just use gstreamer for

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-21 Thread Joe Shaw
Hey, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: I think I mentioned getters and setters for metadata somewhere in this thread, but that's not entirely obvious from the context of the mail you reply to :-) The methods I suggested was only for ingesting in the index. Or are you saying that there should

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-20 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 21:15 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: Ok. If we are to standardize something like this, I would assume that we use dbus for rpc - as far as I can tell that doesn't seem to be a problem..? Yeah, Beagle doesn't use D-Bus at all right now, so to implement the

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-20 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
2007/2/20, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 21:15 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: Ok. If we are to standardize something like this, I would assume that we use dbus for rpc - as far as I can tell that doesn't seem to be a problem..? Yeah, Beagle doesn't use

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-19 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
2007/2/19, Max Wiehle [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Am Montag, den 19.02.2007, 23:14 +0100 schrieb Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen: 2007/2/19, Max Wiehle [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Hope it's okay if i just jump right into the discussion. I just read about wasabi on a

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-19 Thread Max Wiehle
Hi, Is there any where we can have a look at your work? Its in the beagle svn in http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/beagle/branches/beagle-metadata-branch/ mostly in beagled/SqliteMetadata/... It's only the store and some internal beagle

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-18 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
2007/2/18, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: 2007/2/16, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: For people who want to index their data externally we provide an indexing service. Apps can do one of two things: they can make an RPC

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-16 Thread Fabrice Colin
On 2/16/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/2/16, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 07:18 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: I agree - a fast reference implementation in C could be a good idea. We are going to need a sax parser though. I

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-16 Thread jamie
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 12:14 +0800, Fabrice Colin wrote: On 2/16/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have any plans for a standard way of installing new filters? Wasabi could use this (as has also been mentioned on Gnomes desktop-devel-list). For external filters,

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-16 Thread Jos van den Oever
2007/2/16, jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 12:14 +0800, Fabrice Colin wrote: On 2/16/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have any plans for a standard way of installing new filters? Wasabi could use this (as has also been mentioned on Gnomes

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-16 Thread Fabrice Colin
On 2/16/07, jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our requirements (because we are a metadata database as well as an indexer) are probably much different to the others (EG we would need the new metadata names along with their types and properties). we want desktop files over xml specifically for il8n

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-16 Thread jamie
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 21:59 +0800, Fabrice Colin wrote: On 2/16/07, jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our requirements (because we are a metadata database as well as an indexer) are probably much different to the others (EG we would need the new metadata names along with their types and

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-16 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: For external filters, I have shamelessly borrowed Beagle's external-filters.xml with some modifications. Built-in filters register what MIME types they support when the corresponding dynamic library is loaded. For reference:

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-15 Thread Fabrice Colin
On 2/15/07, Jos van den Oever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello wasabi people, Shouldnt we start sharing parts of the code required to implement wasabi? I'm mainly thinking about a struct in c representing a parsed wasabi query and functions to de- and serialize these from either the xml or the

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-15 Thread Jos van den Oever
2007/2/15, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 2/15/07, Jos van den Oever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello wasabi people, Shouldnt we start sharing parts of the code required to implement wasabi? I'm mainly thinking about a struct in c representing a parsed wasabi query and functions to de-

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-15 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, Jos van den Oever wrote: Shouldnt we start sharing parts of the code required to implement wasabi? I'm mainly thinking about a struct in c representing a parsed wasabi query and functions to de- and serialize these from either the xml or the user language. This should be no more than a

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-15 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
2007/2/15, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Jos van den Oever wrote: Shouldnt we start sharing parts of the code required to implement wasabi? I'm mainly thinking about a struct in c representing a parsed wasabi query and functions to de- and serialize these from either the xml or the user

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-15 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
2007/2/15, Fabrice Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 2/15/07, Jos van den Oever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello wasabi people, Shouldnt we start sharing parts of the code required to implement wasabi? I'm mainly thinking about a struct in c representing a parsed wasabi query and functions to de-

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-15 Thread Fabrice Colin
On 2/16/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have any plans for a standard way of installing new filters? Wasabi could use this (as has also been mentioned on Gnomes desktop-devel-list). For external filters, I have shamelessly borrowed Beagle's external-filters.xml

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-15 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 07:18 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: I was thinking about a small c file that implements serializing and deserializing the query language in xml and user language. So no glib and no Qt. That way we can all use

Re: shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-15 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
2007/2/16, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 07:18 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: I was thinking about a small c file that implements serializing and deserializing the query language in xml and user language. So no glib

shared wasabi implementation

2007-02-14 Thread Jos van den Oever
Hello wasabi people, Shouldnt we start sharing parts of the code required to implement wasabi? I'm mainly thinking about a struct in c representing a parsed wasabi query and functions to de- and serialize these from either the xml or the user language. This should be no more than a couple of