(So rereading this, it comes across as kinda harsh, but it wasn't
supposed to be, so just add a :-) to the end of every line or
something. :-)
This specification does not define what the aspect of the
Noticication Items will be, this is strictly implementation specific.
What does aspect mean?
On January 18, 2010, Dan Winship wrote:
StatusNotifierHost
When I first saw this term in the spec I thought it was talking about
having a status icon on one machine and a tray on a different machine.
for all that the status item cares, it could be.
Maybe this is just because I write lots
On January 18, 2010, you wrote:
On 01/18/2010 03:12 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
Also, you need to give *some* indication of what this is for. Eg,
currently it could mean anything from Please raise the indicated window
if the user clicks on the status item to Please hide the indicated
window
On January 18, 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On January 18, 2010, you wrote:
On 01/18/2010 03:12 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
Also, you need to give *some* indication of what this is for. Eg,
currently it could mean anything from Please raise the indicated
window if the user clicks on the
I must say I am a bit taken aback by your responses here.
Dan's mail made me look at the spec for the first time, and I have to
say he is entirely right in his criticism. The spec is full of awkward
naming (StatusNotifierHost, ServiceRegistered, etc), internally
inconsistent (e.g there's a
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 18:17 -0800, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On January 18, 2010, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The spec is full of awkward
naming (StatusNotifierHost, ServiceRegistered, etc),
as noted in my replies, i agree that ServiceRegistered should/could be named
better. the quibble on
On January 18, 2010, you wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 18:17 -0800, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On January 18, 2010, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The spec is full of awkward
naming (StatusNotifierHost, ServiceRegistered, etc),
as noted in my replies, i agree that ServiceRegistered should/could be
