Am 09.07.2012 um 04:04 schrieb Gareth Hughes:
I thought fmtutil-local.cnf was just for customisation.
Indeed! And one customisation could have been to comment XeTeX related lines
copied from somewhere which made tlmgr remove or comment the lines in the
generated fmtutil.cnf.
I thought you
2012/7/9 Peter Dyballa peter_dyba...@web.de:
Am 09.07.2012 um 04:04 schrieb Gareth Hughes:
Start with the basic commands:
which xetex
which fmtutil-sys
which kpsewhich
If it finds your TeX Live binaries, try
kpsewhich fmtutil.cnf
I thought fmtutil-local.cnf was just for customisation.
Am Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:02:45 +0100 schrieb Gareth Hughes:
Checking the path with which xelatex gives
/usr/local/texlive/2011/bin/x86_64-linux/xelatex, which is correct.
Didn't you wrote you updated to TeXLive 2012? Then why do you get a
2011 path?
--
Ulrike Fischer
Yes, all these work, and the files are in the correct place.
Gareth.
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 10:12 +0200, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
2012/7/9 Peter Dyballa peter_dyba...@web.de:
Am 09.07.2012 um 04:04 schrieb Gareth Hughes:
Start with the basic commands:
which xetex
which fmtutil-sys
which
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:50 +0200, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:02:45 +0100 schrieb Gareth Hughes:
Checking the path with which xelatex gives
/usr/local/texlive/2011/bin/x86_64-linux/xelatex, which is correct.
Didn't you wrote you updated to TeXLive 2012? Then why do
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 10:06 +0200, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 09.07.2012 um 04:04 schrieb Gareth Hughes:
I thought fmtutil-local.cnf was just for customisation.
Indeed! And one customisation could have been to comment XeTeX related lines
copied from somewhere which made tlmgr remove or
2012/7/9 Gareth Hughes garzoh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:50 +0200, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:02:45 +0100 schrieb Gareth Hughes:
Checking the path with which xelatex gives
/usr/local/texlive/2011/bin/x86_64-linux/xelatex, which is correct.
Didn't you wrote
2012/7/9 Gareth Hughes garzoh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 10:06 +0200, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 09.07.2012 um 04:04 schrieb Gareth Hughes:
I thought fmtutil-local.cnf was just for customisation.
Indeed! And one customisation could have been to comment XeTeX related lines
copied
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:16:24AM +0100, Gareth Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:50 +0200, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:02:45 +0100 schrieb Gareth Hughes:
Checking the path with which xelatex gives
/usr/local/texlive/2011/bin/x86_64-linux/xelatex, which is
Am Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:52:25 +0200 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
Do not update 2011 to 2012 this is not (and have never been supported),
I just saw that TexLive 2012 contains some instructions to
upgrade. And while it is obviously not recommended to do it the
text contains a lot informations about
2012/7/9 Ulrike Fischer ne...@nililand.de:
I just saw that TexLive 2012 contains some instructions to
upgrade. And while it is obviously not recommended to do it the
text contains a lot informations about possible sources of
interference problems:
This procedure is not bullet-proof, or
Am 09.07.2012 um 23:15 schrieb Andy Black:
I'm installing TeX Live 2012 now and will try and see what happens.
It will be quite similar, the difference between TL '11 and TL '12 is very
small at present.
--
Greetings
Pete \
_\ O _
|o \ _\\_/-\='
12 matches
Mail list logo