On 2015-04-16, David Carlisle d.p.carli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 April 2015 at 20:51, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
That was very naive and did not work when inline math is broken over
multiple lines, so I reverted this and the whole TeX-XeT business. XeTeX
in TeX Live 2015 should
On 17 April 2015 at 13:07, Julian Bradfield jcb+xe...@jcbradfield.org wrote:
On 2015-04-16, David Carlisle d.p.carli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 April 2015 at 20:51, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
That was very naive and did not work when inline math is broken over
multiple lines, so
David Carlisle wrote:
possibly but in the interests of keeping divergence of tex-related
engines to a minimum
as a first approach (if different approaches were being considered)
I'd look to what luatex
is doing, where colour and directionality can be specified without
introducing new
On 17 April 2015 at 15:26, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
David Carlisle wrote:
possibly but in the interests of keeping divergence of tex-related
engines to a minimum
as a first approach (if different approaches were being considered)
I'd look to what luatex
is doing, where
2015-04-17 16:31 GMT+02:00 David Carlisle d.p.carli...@gmail.com:
On 17 April 2015 at 15:26, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
David Carlisle wrote:
possibly but in the interests of keeping divergence of tex-related
engines to a minimum
as a first approach (if different
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 03:31:33PM +0100, David Carlisle wrote:
On 17 April 2015 at 15:26, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
David Carlisle wrote:
possibly but in the interests of keeping divergence of tex-related
engines to a minimum
as a first approach (if different
Hi David, Zdenek, and others
On 18/04/2015, at 1:05, Zdenek Wagner zdenek.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-04-17 16:31 GMT+02:00 David Carlisle d.p.carli...@gmail.com:
package, anyway)
Colour is a font attribut in XeTeX but AFAIK it allowx RGB and RGBA only,
CMYK is not supported. If I want
On 17 April 2015 at 21:43, Ross Moore ross.mo...@mq.edu.au wrote:
B.
I'm currently writing a paper describing a method to attach tooltips to
mathematical symbols and expressions. After setting the chunks in boxes for
measuring, this ultimately puts
\pdfannot
into the
Is there a good tool or TeXnique that lets one see the contents of a
math-stream, after all macros are processed, and during the internal
page-construction stage?
I'd like something a bit better than just examining box contents after
using \tracingall .
$x+y\showlists$
might be what you
