Re: [XeTeX] Package background usage in XeLaTeX

2018-02-16 Thread RD Holkar
Hi, @Urlike Fischer and Zdenek- yes, you are right. I removed the extra tikz package and I could get the vertical rules; see the attachment. There are still a similar issue with another document; I shall write once I get details of it. @Zdenek Wagner

Re: [XeTeX] Package background usage in XeLaTeX

2018-02-16 Thread Ulrike Fischer
Am Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:21:17 +0530 schrieb RD Holkar: > Dear all, > > I am typesetting a memoir in Marathi using package Polyglossia. I found > that the package Background behaves strangely when used with XeLaTeX. > > I am attaching an example in English which is clearly a (La)TeX file (I can >

Re: [XeTeX] Package background usage in XeLaTeX

2018-02-13 Thread Zdenek Wagner
Hi, it seems to be a problem in TikZ. Anyway, if you just want vertical lines, you need no package at all. you can do it just by \vrule in your footer: \makeatletter % allow @ in the macro names \def\ps@mystyle{% definition of the page style \def\@oddhead{\normalfont \normalsize \hfill

[XeTeX] Package background usage in XeLaTeX

2018-02-13 Thread RD Holkar
Dear all, I am typesetting a memoir in Marathi using package Polyglossia. I found that the package Background behaves strangely when used with XeLaTeX. I am attaching an example in English which is clearly a (La)TeX file (I can send the file that uses Polyglossia if needed). I want two vertical