On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Ulrik Vieth wrote:
P.S: Given that Ubuntu provides both 64-bit and 32-bit versions of all the
shared libraries, I did a quick experiment today. I installed the i386-linux
(32-bit) binary for xetex (checked out directly from svn) and gave it a try.
That version works out
-live] [XeTeX] TeXLive Pretest - XeTeX segfaults on LInux 64
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Karl Berry wrote:
What is the build environment for the x86_64-linux texlive binaries?
I.e.: cross compiling? Which OS/distribution? Which compiler
version?
no, nativenone
Peter
fontconfig had a version mistmatch.
Regards, Ulrik.
- Original Nachricht
Von: Peter Breitenlohner p...@mppmu.mpg.de
An: ulrik.vi...@arcor.de
Datum: 19.07.2010 15:12
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [tex-live] [XeTeX] TeXLive Pretest - XeTeX segfaults on
LInux 64
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Karl Berry wrote:
What is the build environment for the x86_64-linux texlive binaries?
I.e.: cross compiling? Which OS/distribution? Which compiler version?
no, nativenone
Peter should answer for sure. The info I have written down from a
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, ulrik.vi...@arcor.de wrote:
The segfault did occur with the latest XeTeX version 0.9997.4.
Updating from 0.9997.3 to 0.9997.4 changed it from segfaulting
immediately when loading unciode-math to segfaulting only in
certain situation, depending on what kind of formulas you
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, ulrik.vi...@arcor.de wrote:
$ xetex --version
XeTeX 3.1415926-2.2-0.9997.4 (TeX Live 2010)
kpathsea version 6.0.0
...
Compiled with zlib version 1.2.3; using 1.2.3
Compiled with FreeType2 version 2.3.11; using 2.3.11
Hi Ulrik,
these are libz and libfreetype linked
What is the build environment for the x86_64-linux texlive binaries?
I.e.: cross compiling? Which OS/distribution? Which compiler version?
Peter should answer for sure. The info I have written down from a past
year is only: gcc 3.4.6, libc 2.3.6, Linux 2.6.28.6.
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:45:14 +0100
Jonathan Kew jfkth...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have just checked-in a patch to the xetex and texlive source trees
to fix the xetex segfault that was occurring with \XeTeXdelcode on
some systems. This brings the xetex version number to 0.9997.4.
Anyone who
On 12 Jul 2010, at 09:21, ulrik.vi...@arcor.de wrote:
I did check with ldd, but I don't have the exact ouput at hand.
AFAIK, the XeTeX-modified ICU library was statically linked.
Only stuff like fontconfig or zlib was dynamically linked.
I am running Ubuntu 10.4 on AMD 64, but I haven't
2010/7/12 Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard m...@elzevir.fr:
so I think his answer is that it is *not* doable to ship 32 bit XeTeX on
LinUX64, since the user would need a 32-bit version of the dynamically linked
libraries.
Which is the norm on OpenSUSE. :-)
Best
Martin
2010/7/12 Martin Schröder mar...@oneiros.de:
2010/7/12 Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard m...@elzevir.fr:
so I think his answer is that it is *not* doable to ship 32 bit XeTeX on
LinUX64, since the user would need a 32-bit version of the dynamically linked
libraries.
Which is the norm on OpenSUSE. :-)
Le 12/07/2010 10:21, ulrik.vi...@arcor.de a écrit :
I wouldn't assume that the problem is with dynamic linking per se.
The crash has probably nothing to do with dynamic linking indeed. Reinhard was
replying to this paragraph:
Would it be a feasible idea to supply Linux32 binaries for XeTeX on
I have just checked-in a patch to the xetex and texlive source trees to fix the
xetex segfault that was occurring with \XeTeXdelcode on some systems. This
brings the xetex version number to 0.9997.4.
Anyone who has been experiencing this problem is welcome to build and test the
new version to
\setromanfont{XITS}
\setmathfont{XITS Math}
For the future: it is much easier to debug problems (any problems) if
they can be reproduced using fonts that are included in TL. Installing
system fonts is not easy, versions are likely to be different, etc.
At any rate, hoping that
On 12 July 2010 Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard wrote:
Le 12/07/2010 10:21, ulrik.vi...@arcor.de a écrit :
I wouldn't assume that the problem is with dynamic linking per se.
The crash has probably nothing to do with dynamic linking
indeed. Reinhard was replying to this paragraph:
Would
On 12 July 2010 Ulrik Vieth wrote:
Would it be a feasible idea to supply Linux32 binaries for XeTeX on
Linux64 platforms? Would this work at all or would this require
additional infrastructure (e.g. 32 bit versions of libraries)?
I assume that the problem is that XeTeX is dynamically
16 matches
Mail list logo
