Re: [XFree86] [XFree86(TM) Bug Report] after few days: Caught signal11. Server aborting

2003-01-16 Thread Peter Finderup Lund
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Vlado Potisk wrote: Regarding: after few days: Caught signal 11. Server aborting Have you checked http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ ? It might be bad hardware and not a real X server error. -Peter ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [XFree86] [XFree86(TM) Bug Report] after few days: Caught signal11. Server aborting

2003-01-16 Thread Peter Finderup Lund
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Vlado Potisk wrote: It might be bad hardware and not a real X server error. It might be, but it is not very probable if you consider: - thorough check with memtest86 passed recently You didn't write that in the original mail. - no problem with 3.3.6 in

Re: [XFree86] [XFree86(TM) Bug Report] after few days: Caught signal11. Server aborting

2003-01-16 Thread Peter Finderup Lund
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Vlado Potisk wrote: Maybe the question then becomes: what fonts do you have on your system? I have an external font server, If you want to see any font list, please write what command I have to run to produce it. _fs_load_glyphs() seems to be part of a module that

Re: [XFree86] [XFree86(TM) Bug Report] after few days: Caught signal11. Server aborting

2003-01-16 Thread Peter Finderup Lund
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Vlado Potisk wrote: Can you recompile the X server with debug symbols on (-g) to get a better backtrace ... or alternatively thru creative use of gdb correlate the address in _fs_load_glyphs() from the backtrace with a line number in xc/lib/font/fc/fserve.c ? OK, I

Re: [XFree86] [XFree86(TM) Bug Report] after few days: Caught signal11. Server aborting

2003-01-16 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Vlado Potisk wrote: Regarding: after few days: Caught signal 11. Server aborting Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] XFree86 Version: 4.2.0 and also 4.2.1 OS: Linux RedHat 7.3 and also Mandrake 9 [SNIP] Repeat By: My X

Re: [XFree86] [XFree86(TM) Bug Report] after few days: Caught signal11. Server aborting

2003-01-16 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Vlado Potisk wrote: Have you checked http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ ? It might be bad hardware and not a real X server error. It might be, but it is not very probable if you consider: - thorough check with memtest86 passed recently Ugh.. I should have read the

Re: [XFree86] [XFree86(TM) Bug Report] after few days: Caught signal11. Server aborting

2003-01-16 Thread Peter Finderup Lund
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote: From what I've seen, most segfaults with the last official release are due to bugs in the font renderers, or maybe just in the font server. You could try explicitly putting font paths in the XF86Config Not just in the font server -- a bad font

Re: [XFree86] [XFree86(TM) Bug Report] after few days: Caught signal11. Server aborting

2003-01-16 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Peter Finderup Lund wrote: On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote: From what I've seen, most segfaults with the last official release are due to bugs in the font renderers, or maybe just in the font server. You could try explicitly putting font paths in the

Re: [XFree86] [XFree86(TM) Bug Report] after few days: Caught signal11. Server aborting

2003-01-16 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Peter Finderup Lund wrote: On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just connecting and throwing /dev/urandom on it until xfs closed the connection or crashed. Once it was running without problems for more than 3 days I gave up. Brilliant! I'm wondering