A belated thanks to all who responded. Much appreciated.
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Shentino wrote:
Oh, well in that case I agree with you, at least to a point. Can't
say I agree with xfree86's licensing, nor can I say I disagree. What
does bother me is that the FSF would be so abruptly
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Shentino wrote:
Oh, well in that case I agree with you, at least to a point. Can't
say I agree with xfree86's licensing, nor can I say I disagree. What
does bother me is that the FSF would be so abruptly hardassed about it
instead of trying to negotiate.
I was curious
Oh, well in that case I agree with you, at least to a point. Can't
say I agree with xfree86's licensing, nor can I say I disagree. What
does bother me is that the FSF would be so abruptly hardassed about it
instead of trying to negotiate.
I was curious if there might be something from xfree86's
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Shentino wrote:
No offense intended, I'm just a humble (and apparently ignorant) end
user who has been stuck in the jungle for a few years and that link
was the first I ever heard about it.
My apologies if I came off as an arrogant one-sided clod.
Not you. No. I was
No offense intended, I'm just a humble (and apparently ignorant) end
user who has been stuck in the jungle for a few years and that link
was the first I ever heard about it.
My apologies if I came off as an arrogant one-sided clod.
___
XFree86 mailing
5 matches
Mail list logo
