Re: Fix for Xlib with ipv6 support on ipv4 only systems

2003-08-14 Thread Mark Vojkovich
Out of curiosity. Is the ipv6 supposed to be working properly now? Last time I updated, I noticed that remote operation was broken. That is, Xlib was unable to connect to a remote system (I assume it didn't work with internet sockets anymore, but unix domain sockets still worked).

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [Dri-devel] Rage128 and Radeon patches

2003-08-14 Thread Steven Newbury
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 19:06, Alex Deucher wrote: I haven't tried multiple radeon cards, but I seem to recall several people having this problem right around when 4.3.0 was released. I don't think a proper fix ever went in and I think the issue was to be revisited later. I don't know if it's

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [Dri-devel] Rage128 and Radeon patches

2003-08-14 Thread Alex Deucher
I haven't tried multiple radeon cards, but I seem to recall several people having this problem right around when 4.3.0 was released. I don't think a proper fix ever went in and I think the issue was to be revisited later. I don't know if it's needed anymore or not. Alex --- Jon Smirl [EMAIL

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [Dri-devel] Rage128 and Radeon patches

2003-08-14 Thread Jon Smirl
--- Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) access ROM directly instead of relying on copy in low RAM. This allows multiple cards. Required MPP_TB_CONFIG fix in driver. Is this patch necessary for xfree86? It may address some of the issues in the email threads I sent out yesterday

Re: [Fonts] Problem of Xft2

2003-08-14 Thread Chisato Yamauchi
From: Pablo Saratxaga [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Fonts] Problem of Xft2 Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 18:32:34 +0200 The right and wrong of a toolkit become clear when using Xft2. For me, Qt is the only choice when using Xft2. So I do I feel exactly the opposite: as Qt doesn't have

[Fonts] Re: After-XTT's extension of the encoding field.

2003-08-14 Thread Jungshik Shin
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Mike FABIAN wrote: Jungshik Shin [EMAIL PROTECTED] : On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Chisato Yamauchi wrote: Have you seen CJK's *TYPICAL* fonts.dir of TrueType fonts? It is following: Not many people would be fond of tweaking fonts.dir/scale files these days :-) It

Re: [Fonts] Re: Problem of Xft2

2003-08-14 Thread Jungshik Shin
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Jungshik Shin wrote: On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Pablo Saratxaga wrote: That being said, it would be nice to have the ability to do user-configuration of glyph substitutions in gtk2; eg telling that when a given font is choosen, then characters of range 0x00-0xff should

Re: [Fonts] After-XTT's extension of the encoding field.

2003-08-14 Thread Egbert Eich
David Dawes writes: Just so people don't get the wrong idea about what XFree86 is doing, core (server-side) font support will continue to be supported and maintained while ever there are sections of our user base that need it. The same is true of our inclusion of the 'xtt' module as

Re: [Fonts] Re: After-XTT's extension of the encoding field.

2003-08-14 Thread Jungshik Shin
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Mike FABIAN wrote: Jungshik Shin [EMAIL PROTECTED] : On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Mike FABIAN wrote: It can be automatically generated. The /usr/sbin/fonts-config script on SuSE Linux generates such TTCap entries automatically into the make some people frustrated if it just

[Fonts] Re: Problem of Xft2

2003-08-14 Thread Jungshik Shin
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Pablo Saratxaga wrote: On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 06:59:43PM +0900, Chisato Yamauchi wrote: But Gtk2 has not complete font-substitution mechanism. Therefore, Gtk2 is insufficient in CJK environment. GTk2, using pango, has builtin fontset mechanism. (it is always

[Fonts] AWARD NOTIFICATION

2003-08-14 Thread primitivasl
C/GUZMAN EL BUENO,137 MADRID - ESPANA TEL: +34-669 051 095, FAX:+34 916 640 223 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FROM: THE DESK OF THE PROMOTIONS MANAGER, INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS/PRIZE AWARD

[Fonts] Re: After-XTT's extension of the encoding field.

2003-08-14 Thread Mike FABIAN
Jungshik Shin [EMAIL PROTECTED] さんは書きました: On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Chisato Yamauchi wrote: Have you seen CJK's *TYPICAL* fonts.dir of TrueType fonts? It is following: Not many people would be fond of tweaking fonts.dir/scale files these days :-)

Re: [Fonts] After-XTT's extension of the encoding field.

2003-08-14 Thread Egbert Eich
Chisato Yamauchi writes: OK, so you are not selecting different ranges but different files? Is it a standard procedure to distribute one font accross several files or was the single file just split into separate ones just to avoid blowing up the XFontStruct? GT fonts is a quite

[Fonts] (no subject)

2003-08-14 Thread admin
___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts

[Fonts] CONFIDENTIAL MATTER

2003-08-14 Thread magrethhatch
From: Mrs Magreth Hatch PLEASE ENDEAVOUR TO USE IT FOR THE CHILDREN OF GOD. I am the above named person from Kuwait. I am married to Mr. Kazeem Hatch who worked with Kuwait embassy in Ivory Coast for nine years before he died in the year 2001. We were married for eleven years without a

[Fonts] Re: Terminal versus X11 fonts

2003-08-14 Thread Jungshik Shin
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Steve Sullivan wrote: For example, the Terminal edit current profile gui shows the Miriam font, but Miriam isn't listed by xfontsel or xlsfonts. There are two separate font systems, the X11 core font system and the client-side system with Xft/fontconfig. What you get

[I18n] .. Debt Sucks! Read This.miofdsa

2003-08-14 Thread recailwbvosk
Read this! How are you? Paying off a loan like the rest of america? We blast your debt and give you a fresh start! - Save you a lot of money by eliminating late fees - Settle your accounts for a substantially reduced amount - Stop creditors calling you on the phone - Avoid bankruptcy ... and

Re: [I18n] Re: Some thoughts on XKB symbols

2003-08-14 Thread Danilo Segan
, 14. 2003. 04:32:57 CEST Frank Murphy : Sorry, I meant shift levels. my proposed us-ascii would have just key AE01 { [ 1,exclam ] }; not key AE01 { [ 1, exclam, onesuperior, exclamdown ] }; I'd go for: key AE01 { [ 1, exclam,

Re: [I18n] Re: Some thoughts on XKB symbols

2003-08-14 Thread Ivan Pascal
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: Is there a difference between CA(fr) and fr(CA)* Does the user care about it ? Should we make them mean the same thing ? *FR(ca) would be different, although possibly unimportant or meaningless. I think there is a minor difference. In such name the first word

Re: [I18n] Re: Some thoughts on XKB symbols

2003-08-14 Thread Danilo Segan
, 14. 2003. 13:12:05 Dr Andrew C Aitchison : On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Danilo Segan wrote: For the sake of difference, I would recommend the following: - National keymaps should use ISO 3166 code in all UPPERCASE (eg. US) - Linguistic keymaps should use ISO 639 code in all lowercase (eg.

Re: [I18n] Re: Some thoughts on XKB symbols

2003-08-14 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Danilo Segan wrote: For the sake of difference, I would recommend the following: - National keymaps should use ISO 3166 code in all UPPERCASE (eg. US) - Linguistic keymaps should use ISO 639 code in all lowercase (eg. en) Is this going to cause us to run into CVS problem

Re: [I18n] Re: Some thoughts on XKB symbols

2003-08-14 Thread Danilo Segan
, 13. 2003. 18:58:40 CEST Frank Murphy : The only xkb_symbols us that I see are in digital/us and xfree68/ataritt. But the map would be the same as the xkb_symbols basic in pc/us, basically, the same as latin(basic) only not including the group 2 or 3 symbols (exclamdown, etc.). However, it

[I18n] Settle your debt without taking out another loan!

2003-08-14 Thread bvbpfheurpxw
Read this! Dont you hate paying off your loans? ... . We can help! We can consolidate your bills into just one low monthly payment. Start Fresh! - Save you a lot of money by eliminating late fees - Settle your accounts for a substantially reduced amount - Stop creditors calling you on the phone

Re: [I18n] Re: Some thoughts on XKB symbols

2003-08-14 Thread Danilo Segan
, 14. 2003. 17:35:10 CEST Frank Murphy : I'd go for: key AE01 { [ 1, exclam, any, any ] }; (I'm not sure if your idea would work like this -- if it would, then this is unneccessary burden). It's already done with only two levels in the pc/us keymap. I don't see a reason to

Re: [I18n] Re: Some thoughts on XKB symbols

2003-08-14 Thread Frank Murphy
Sorry, I meant shift levels. my proposed us-ascii would have just key AE01 { [ 1,exclam ] }; not key AE01 { [ 1, exclam, onesuperior, exclamdown ] }; I'd go for: key AE01 { [ 1, exclam, any, any ] }; (I'm not sure if your

Re: [I18n] Re: Some thoughts on XKB symbols

2003-08-14 Thread Frank Murphy
The only xkb_symbols us that I see are in digital/us and xfree68/ataritt. But the map would be the same as the xkb_symbols basic in pc/us, basically, the same as latin(basic) only not including the group 2 or 3 symbols (exclamdown, etc.). However, it would be in the latin file and

Re: [I18n] Re: Some thoughts on XKB symbols

2003-08-14 Thread Frank Murphy
No, I didn't mean to imply that FR was choosen as a default for fr because of textual similarity, but rather, because France, with ISO 3166 code of FR, is the originator of French language fr (perhaps this is not a good enough reasoning, and your reasoning based on population might be more

<    1   2   3   4