CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/24 06:50:27
Log message:
326. Removed ru_yawerty xkb symbols file as it is misleading as suggested
by Ivan Pasacal (Bugzilla #516, Ivan Pascal).
325. Fixed two bounds errors in rman
CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/24 15:08:29
Log message:
327. Add Mach64 I2C framework. Derived from GATOS project (Marc La France).
Modified files:
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/:
CHANGELOG
CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/24 18:17:06
Log message:
A few I2C-related cleanups
Modified files:
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/ddc/:
xf86DDC.c
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/apm/:
apm_driver.c
Marc Aurele La France writes:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Egbert Eich wrote:
Marc Aurele La France writes:
I don't like the peppering of this code with more OS #ifdef's. I think
the approach espoused by Itojun, Todd, Matthieu and Andrew is better.
So maybe you can tell what the
This 'nolisten' code was added on 1996/11/24 with revision 3.22.
The cvs log only says:
revision 3.22
date: 1996/11/24 09:58:50; author: dawes; state: Exp; lines: +14 -1
updates
I would assume it was taken straight from a SI merge.
Alan Coopersmith writes:
Maybe I'm missing something,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 02:22:10AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
I have no problem for them to go proprietary, but i would very much like
a powerpc version of said drivers. Since both of them also release
drivers for MacOSX, i guess this would not be very expensive to just
rebuild powerpc
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 05:12:00AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
Not very many, and their competitirs would then have access to all their IP, so
could out-do them in the next generation of cards.
I doubt that it would involve hardware as much as it
I see from
http://www.xig.com/Pages/PrReleases/PRMay03-830-O'lays.pdf
that hardware overlays (possibly similar to what we currently do
in the mga and glint drivers) are possible on the Intel i830 chipset.
Does anyone know anything more, or is anyone actually working on
adding support to
Hmm,
with the current approach a -nolisten to an alias has no effect
anyway. A '-nolisten tcp' will have the same effect as a
'-nolisten unix': None.
The reason is that a flag is set for the protocol however when
the protocols are initialized the aliases aren't checked.
Also tcp is aliased
Andrew C Aitchison writes:
Egbert's latest patch compiles and runs, but it isn't addressing my problem.
This is with
Red Hat 8.0
Linux 2.4.20-19.8
gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7)
(I have the same problem with Red Hat 6.2).
The system is *not*
Egbert Eich wrote:
This 'nolisten' code was added on 1996/11/24 with revision 3.22.
The cvs log only says:
revision 3.22
date: 1996/11/24 09:58:50; author: dawes; state: Exp; lines: +14 -1
updates
I would assume it was taken straight from a SI merge.
The SI doesn't have the -nolisten option.
Hello everyone!
Can any one please tell me the meaning of all these flags?
These relate to CT VGA driver in XFree86 code.
Iam writing the driver for CT 69030.
/* Architecture type flags */
#define ChipsHiQV 0x0001
#define ChipsWingine 0x0002
#define IS_Wingine(x) ((x-Flags)
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Egbert Eich wrote:
Can we just declare that inet and inet6 both match tcp ?
The way the code is currently written aliases like tcp alias
to exactly one transport type. There is no fallback mechanism.
The easiest way would be to alias tcp to inet instead of inet6.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Which operating systems are shipping with IPv6 enabled by default ?
NetBSD has IPv6 enable by default, Solaris hasn't.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
Matthias Scheler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Which operating systems are shipping with IPv6 enabled by default ?
NetBSD has IPv6 enable by default, Solaris hasn't.
Solaris sort of does - on Solaris 8 and later, you can always use an AF_INET6
sorry for being lazy and not RTFM, but
after i send a patch to the patch email addy,
and i have received an acknowledge ..
- how long does it takes to get an answer - usually
- will it happen to get no answer at all ?
thx for any reply
sven
___
Devel
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 04:42:31PM -0700, Kendall Bennett wrote:
Jon Leech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll back that up. Besides which, after a few years of being bitched
at (and in one case involving a friend who's a senior software engineer at
a commodity graphics vendor, physically
from 24 hours to 7 days depending on complexity
and on people having time working on it.
-Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Sven Goethel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 19:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: patch procedure ..
sorry for being lazy and not
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:34:53PM -0400, Keith Packard wrote:
Around 23 o'clock on Jul 23, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Here's a patch to allow multiple '-nolisten' options on the command
line. To disable both IPv4 and IPv6 transports, one needs to say:
X -nolisten tcp -nolisten inet6
To whom it may concern,
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but
is this feature planned for the next release (4.44)?
Is it being worked on? If so who do I need to
talk to in order to best assist in its development?
Thanks
Gareth.
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frankly, your own rants against XFree86 and some of its volunteers
recently are no different than this. It sure left a bad taste in our
mouths. There is a sickening propensity towards hostile and intimidating
behaviour from several quarters, and it
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frankly, your own rants against XFree86 and some of its volunteers
recently are no different than this. It sure left a bad taste in
our mouths. There is a sickening propensity towards hostile and
intimidating behaviour from several quarters, and it
Yes, The Mobile chipsets could do this under several circumstances.
The desktop chips cannot.
Could you provide an indication of what such a feature is actually
useful for? It seems like more of a toy feature than something
with real world applications.
Seems like you could actually run at 24bpp
Just to add to this:
I was looking at this the other day and along with native rotated
rendering to the framebuffer it would be nice if the ShadowFB could
indicate that it is capable of doing the rotation too.
i.e. When rotation is requested from the config or RandR
Option 1:
If the hardware
hail!
I have got a huge problem with readhat
9:
the X is not working!
not working at the install and not working when i
try to start the linux!
hedon'trecognize my video
card!
my config:
MSI KT4-Ultra
AMD XP 2000+
256 DDR
Eagle GeForce FX 5200 64 DDR
Maxtor 40 Gb
etc...
please help me!
i
Hi
i would like to ask, why i can't run my multiple session of startx.
I try to run startx -- :2 but the x window session can't run.
this is the contants of /var/log/XFree86.2.log
XFree86 Version 4.2.1 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 3
Hi,
I've posted before regarding a Shuttle SB51G with the CV21 TV Out module.
The TV Out works fine in text mode and X but as it's max res is 800x600
uses only a small piece of the TV screen area. Apparently what I need is
TV Overscan (please correct me if I'm wrong in this or even agree if I'm
Hello People
plz guide me in these two regards
1. Does XFree86 Provide Overlay Implementation ? if Yes then is Accelerated
X better for Overlay Implementation or XFree86
2. i have Maxtrox 450, where can i get the Updated mga DRIVER because
default does't support Matrox 450
Thanking in
Ho una scheda video Radon 7500 All
in Wonder e un monitor LCD NEC 1550v, dopo
linstallazione di REDHAT 9.1
Il sistema mi dice che non è riuscito ad avviare il server xfree.
Vi allego il log che XFree86 genera quando viene lanciato e il file di configurazione usato XF86Config
Come
Hi,
I setup a machine with RedHat v8.0 a few months back. X had been working
fine, but a recent up2date installed a new kernel and a new version of X:
Kernel: 2.4.20-19.8
XFree86: 4.2.1-21
Now X no longer runs. Below is the output from the startx command and my log
is attached. If you have any
All,
Does anyone have a Flatscreen working, both in Portrait mode and Landscape mode
under XFree86 and Linux?
If so, I'd really appreciate some help. I have an NVidia graphics card, and
can set an option in the XFree86 config file to rotate the screen to portrait
mode, but can not work out how
-Messaggio
originale-
Da: DANIELE BAGNAI
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: giovedì 24 luglio 2003
14.24
A:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Oggetto: Aiuto configurazione
XFree
Ho una scheda video Radon 7500 All in Wonder e un monitor
LCD NEC 1550v, dopo
-Messaggio
originale-
Da: DANIELE BAGNAI
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: giovedì 24 luglio 2003
14.24
A:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Oggetto: Aiuto configurazione
XFree
I
have an Ati radeon 7500 All in Wonder video card and an LCD NEC 1550v monitor, after
Hello all,
I'm looking to put together a couple of linux (Debian) workstations with
dual 20 LCDs, and I was wondering if anyone here could recommend a card that's
likely to cooperate with Xinerama with a minimum of hassle? We'll be using these
workstations to write number-crunching scientific
Title: RE: [XFree86] Laptop touchpad and XFree86 4.3.0[GFI-T61361-3F2046730DCE4E29]
My experience is that a LOT of things in XFree86 4.3.0 are either broke, or not working at all. A perfect example of this would be the RandR (resize and rotate) support for every driver that previously
Hi
I have a big problem here. We have a linux device that runs without a real
keyboard and get its command through a socket connection vi tcpip. But now I
need to simulate keyevents to the system like a vitual keyboard with java
(sun jvm 1.3.1). I figured that I am not able to simulate keyevents
Hello all,
When calling for a non-existing screenmode, X seems to settle for the closest
one (like calling for 398x287 from xmame, getting 400x300). With my ATI card,
standard XFree86 drivers, I get a lot of rubbish on the edges of the screen
(outside the 398x287 area), as if that part of the
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Cameron B. Prince wrote:
I setup a machine with RedHat v8.0 a few months back. X had been working
fine, but a recent up2date installed a new kernel and a new version of X:
Kernel: 2.4.20-19.8
XFree86: 4.2.1-21
Now X no longer runs. Below is the output from the startx
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Sonny Hoang wrote:
Hello, I just installed RedHat Linux 9 and when I
tried to log in as root, the XServer crashed. I
looked at the log file at /var/log/XFree86.1.log and
saw:
ATI(0): Depth 16 is not supported through this
adapter
My graphic card is an ATI Graphic
Hi Hasseb,
I can't do much more than share my experience but perhaps that will be
enough. I am currently using a G550 with XFree86 v4.3.0. The hardware
overlay works very well for me, i.e. I get 24 plane TrueColor visuals
and an 8 plane PseudoColor visual. I have done 2 things beyond
Hi Mark,
Sorry, According to the XFree86.0.log, the problem could come from :
(==) Log file: /var/log/XFree86.0.log, Time: Thu Jul 24 15:00:18 2003
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/XF86Config
Parse error on line 11 of section ServerLayout in file /etc/X11/XF86Config
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, [iso-8859-1] Gareth wrote:
All,
Does anyone have a Flatscreen working, both in Portrait mode and Landscape mode
under XFree86 and Linux?
If so, I'd really appreciate some help. I have an NVidia graphics card, and
can set an option in the XFree86 config file to
To my recollection, RedHat 9 came with XFree86 4.3, which should
support this card. We'll need to see your /var/log/XFree86.0.log
file.
Mark.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, peris wrote:
hail!
I have got a huge problem with readhat 9:
the X is not working!
not working at
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:47:56PM +0200, Alf C Stockton wrote:
Non of the three things you are seeing are related.
1. Your startx creates an .Xauthority for you.
2. You are seeing the error message because you appearantly don't have
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:23:53AM -0700, nathan wrote:
I just went back to runlevel 3, killed gpm, restarted X, and checked for gpm.
It was not running, and I still have a trackball-shaped paperweight. gpm
does not appear to be interfering with X.
In your configuration file I saw
Try inserting this line in your Module section of the config file:
Load ddc
(mine is listed right below the dbe module)
Jesse
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Michael Godbout wrote:
Hi,
Everytime I first boot my PC into linux (from cold start), Xfree is
incapable of starting. When I soft reboot,
Y have a Rage 128
Fury Pro 32M
Ican`t setup
XFree for tjis card.
Please help urgent,
because I need for work in the next Saturday.
Thanks Claudio
Bozzo
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The log of this
is:
XFree86 Version 4.3.0
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0,
I believe you need to add this line to the ServerFlags section of the
config file:
Option RandR 0
Jesse
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Claudio Bozzo (E-mail 3) wrote:
Y have a Rage 128 Fury Pro 32M
I can`t setup XFree for tjis card.
Please help urgent, because I need for work in the next Saturday.
Hello!
I use a NVidia DDR-DVI with an digital display. I tried XFree 4.3.0 with the
nv driver but
it failed because the display was swimming and I cant recognize anything.
I show you
the log below. Note that the nvidia driver by NVidia worked fine.
Is there a way to use XFree without the
Hi,
From your log:
(II) LoadModule: glx
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so
(II) Module glx: vendor=NVIDIA Corporation
... [snip] ...
(EE) [GLX]: Failed to add GLX extension (NVIDIA XFree86 driver not found)
libglx.so is being loaded, but it is a lib from the NVIDIA
Hi,
I'm trying to compile XFree86 version 4.3.0 on Linux with GCC 3.3 and get
the following error:
../../exports/lib/libXaw.so undefined reference to `.L91'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [bitmap] Error 1
..
..
What is L91 and how to fi this problem?
Please reply.
W
It couldn't read the EDID information from the monitor for
some reason, so it couldn't autodetect that it was a digital
flat panel. You can override that in the XF86Config file with:
Option FlatPanel
In the Section Device.
Mark.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 [EMAIL
It's possible that you don't have the right version of binutils for gcc3.3
and need to upgrade, but that's just a guess.
Jesse
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Wahib Nackad wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile XFree86 version 4.3.0 on Linux with GCC 3.3 and get
the following error:
At 8-bit color and 1024x768 using the MozillaFirebird browser, some of the plain text,
link text, and button text that should be colored is instead black. If I right-click
on the text, sometimes it will turn to its correct color, but if I scroll it turns
black again. If I run in 800x600 the
54 matches
Mail list logo
