[XFree86] Re: KeyBoard BUG on sparc/sparc64 in 4.3.0 too.

2003-03-01 Thread David S. Miller
From: Balint Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 17:11:34 +0200 Unable to handle kernel paging request \|/ \|/ @'/ .. \`@ /_| \__/ |_\ \__U_/ setserial(104): Oops The program setserial is

Re: [XFree86] Re: KeyBoard BUG on sparc/sparc64 in 4.3.0 too.

2003-03-02 Thread David S. Miller
From: Rene Rebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 12:20:04 +0100 (CET) since this is the only reply from you to this topic, I wonder whether the 4.3.0 release is working properly on your SPARC machines? I haven't been able to find time to do that since the last time I

[XFree86] Re: Sol/Sparc: XLUT MapSbusMem failure

2003-06-04 Thread David S. Miller
From: Mike Russo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 03 Jun 2003 08:51:46 -0400 I have tried to get in contact with Dave Miller or Jakub at RedHat, but they have not responded. Neither of us have access to Solaris desktop systems, we wrote those drivers and tested them on Linux, so a Solaris

[XFree86] Re: sparc64 + pci domain + 2.6.0-testX + scanpci

2003-10-03 Thread David S. Miller
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 00:12:39 -0400 Balint Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just Questioning if anyone has got xfree86 work on sparc64/linux to recognise the newest /sys or got to recognise correctly in scanning the pci from /proc the new :XX:XX pci-domain prefix included

[XFree86] Re: Xfree86 and PCI domains on psarc.

2003-12-30 Thread David S. Miller
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:02:24 -0800 (PST) Mike Mestnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a sparc64 with a mach64 on a pci bus. The format of /proc/bus/pci/ has changed in 2.6 to include a pci [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have not been able to locate a patch and even debian's experimental branch /w

[XFree86] Re: Xfree86 and PCI domains on psarc.

2003-12-30 Thread David S. Miller
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:10:45 -0500 Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 06:37:28PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: Nobody has done the work, I started on it but I have no intention of going back to it any time soon. I thought Willy was working on this with you. Did

Re: SlowBCopy, IA64, PCI bus corruption

2003-08-14 Thread David S. Miller
On 11 Aug 2003 17:55:50 -0400 John Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now it seems to me that using extra machine instructions (asm version) or no-op IO is inherently a risky solution to this problem. It would appear there is some interval of time one must wait for individual VGA bus

[Xpert]Re:

2001-12-03 Thread David S. Miller
From: Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 3 Dec 2001 12:29:51 PST Or, if the obscure header is part of the Solaris distribution, I have it and must have missed it while trying to go through the Solaris headers looking for likely names or strings. Could you tell me what it is?