I'm aware that the accel features of matroxfb (ala 2.5/2.6) can only
take advantage of the lower 16MB of a 32MB G450 card. My question
revolves around the fact that fbset -i tells me my card has 16MB even
though dmesg reports the driver detecting 32MB like it should. I hacked
mga_vid
Not sure if this is the place for bugs, in fact i really think it's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] so i'll cc it to them too.
It might have been mentioned already but the cvs head is not up to date
with freetype2 2.1.7 Many XFT and freetype related source and header
files have #include freetype/freetype.h
David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:47:04PM -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote:
Not sure if this is the place for bugs, in fact i really think it's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] so i'll cc it to them too.
It might have been mentioned already but the cvs head is not up to date
with freetype2 2.1.7 Many
David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:19:01PM -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:47:04PM -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote:
Not sure if this is the place for bugs, in fact i really think it's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] so i'll cc it to them too.
It might have been
I'm fairly sure i've pushed XFree86 as far as i can without
reprogramming anything for 2d performance.
I've compiled all of X with -march=athlon-tbird -O2 -mmmx -m3dnow
-ftracer using modified flag variables in my host.conf as well as
profile compiling which i had X up doing my thing for over a
Billy Biggs wrote:
Ed Sweetman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
My config settings for my matrox g450 are aggressive with agp enabled
Does the open source driver use DMA at all? If it doesn't, do the
higher AGP modes even help at all?
for matrox? I believe so. I'm sure some drivers do not but i'd
Billy Biggs wrote:
Ed Sweetman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
My config settings for my matrox g450 are aggressive with agp
enabled
Does the open source driver use DMA at all? If it doesn't, do the
higher AGP modes even help at all?
for matrox? I believe so. I'm sure some drivers do not but i'd
suspect
performance out of a
slow video card, not as an example of how things should be done.
Ed Sweetman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Don't trust this. The video stuff is often quite hacky and it's
not very good, even for this 'well supported' card. Specs are
widely available yet all of these drivers could
Mark Vojkovich wrote:
That means shmget failed. The kenel config you provided does
show SYSVIPC enabled, however... You should run the nv driver
that came with XFree86 to ensure that you can get the server started
with working MIT-SHM support (ie. a benchmark like x11perf -shmput500
succeeds).
I've looked everywhere on my system that could be setting the priority
of X to -1 and i cant find any scripts that do it. So i assume that the
X server, itself, is setting the priority to -1. I am running the cvs
pull of X on 2.6.0-test11 on a debian unstable system. I would really
I ran across a little oddity while working on the matrox driver. In
MGAPutImage, the ScreenInfoPtr sent to it which is then converted to a
MGAPtr does not have drmCtx set to a non-zero value even though dri is
enabled and working at the time the function is called. I do not
understand why
line 967 of mga_dri.c has a typo on the comment. it has to be fixed to
*/ so that the code below it is not commented out. sorry bout that.
Ed Sweetman wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is probably a better place for this]
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:36:25AM -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote
David Dawes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is probably a better place for this]
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:36:25AM -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote:
I ran across a little oddity while working on the matrox driver. In
MGAPutImage, the ScreenInfoPtr sent to it which is then converted to a
MGAPtr does
Rahul Sawarkar wrote:
Hi
I'm not clear.
From: Ian Romanick
When the card has to draw less pixels, a **larger** percentage of the
time is spent sending commands from the CPU to the card.
When the window is tiny, the card is drawing fewer pixels, but the CPU
has to send the **same** number of
David Dawes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is probably a better place for this]
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:36:25AM -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote:
I ran across a little oddity while working on the matrox driver. In
MGAPutImage, the ScreenInfoPtr sent to it which is then converted to a
MGAPtr does
No, actually I dont recieve anything not CC'd to me from the list even
though i'm subscribed. It appears my isp is blocking the list because
I sure as hell aren't :)
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 03:14, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On 9 Jul 2002, Ed Sweetman wrote:
I'm not sure
http://signal-lost.homeip.net/xconfig
http://signal-lost.homeip.net/16bpp.log
http://signal-lost.homeip.net/32bpp.log
I start X with `xinit -- -dpi 100`
from what Keith said it doesn't matter what resolution i'm on, Render
can create an alpha layer as long as depth is not smaller than bpp. I
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 04:54, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On 9 Jul 2002, Ed Sweetman wrote:
http://signal-lost.homeip.net/xconfig
http://signal-lost.homeip.net/16bpp.log
http://signal-lost.homeip.net/32bpp.log
I start X with `xinit -- -dpi 100`
from what Keith said it doesn't
I am only able to start X with fbpp at 24 if I want depth to be 32.
Setting both to 32 will not work. it gets the error reported in the
32bpp.logBut yea, I dont care about 3d so this seems alright.
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 04:54, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On 9 Jul 2002, Ed Sweetman
19 matches
Mail list logo
