Re: Patch ping

2003-07-15 Thread Nick Hudson
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 1:32 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote: [...] I feel that the fact SharedLibObjCompile() is unused in our _current_ tree is insufficient reason to remove it. It provides nothing over and above NormalSharedLibObjCompile which is used. Maybe I'm wrong... Nick

Re: Patch ping

2003-07-15 Thread Nick Hudson
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 4:00 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote: [...] The imake rule in question will not be removed because there is nothing to preclude its use by external packages such as those found in X.Org's contrib/. Ok. Thanks for explaining. Am I on a road to nowhere in attempting to

Remove redundant SharedLibObjCompile

2003-07-01 Thread Nick Hudson
Hi, I'm playing with the X build infrastructure and I noticed that SharedLibObjCompile is redundant. Attached is a patch to remove it. Nick ps. see http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-x11/2003/06/02/0001.html for what I'm trying to achieve. Index: config/cf/Imake.rules