If one is using RH 9.0 then Xconfigurator has been removed and replaced by something
else (I have
no time to check what it is)
Lionel
--- Andrew A. Gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Andrew A. Gill wrote:
http://www.frontiernet.net/~superluser/XF86Config
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Andrew A. Gill wrote:
I finally decided to install all of the errata for my system, and now I'm
having trouble with X. Meta trouble. Every time I try to explain it, I
keep saying things like ``the pictures are in the right place, but the
widgets are all in the top
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
What effect does Option NoAccel have?
The desired effect.
Well, more or less. xf86cfg works, with no more (whatevers), but startx
quits with the following bits:
Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 10
The XKEYBOARD
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Andrew A. Gill wrote:
I finally decided to install all of the errata for my system, and now I'm
having trouble with X. Meta trouble. Every time I try to explain it, I
keep saying things like ``the pictures are in the right place, but the
widgets are all in the top
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Andrew A. Gill wrote:
http://www.frontiernet.net/~superluser/XF86Config
http://www.frontiernet.net/~superluser/XF86Config-4
http://www.frontiernet.net/~superluser/XFree86.0.log
Well, if you were going to complain about Xconfigurator, I've run
XF86Config, and updated the
I finally decided to install all of the errata for my system, and now I'm
having trouble with X. Meta trouble. Every time I try to explain it, I
keep saying things like ``the pictures are in the right place, but the
widgets are all in the top quarter of the screen.''
Which causes most people to
6 matches
Mail list logo
