[xmail] Re: XMail + WAI = Spool + 100% CPU load

2002-05-29 Thread Quost Support
Hi, I stopped running frozcache.vbs and it does not make a difference. It was only running once a day anyway - there is very little mail traffic on the server. The problem does not seem to occur at any special time or for any reason I can find. I rebooted the server last night, and within 2

[xmail] Creating users

2002-05-29 Thread Adrian Hicks
Hi all. I've tried creating new users with the MkUsers command but it doesn't work. If I start the program on its own and follow the directions in the doc like: domain;username;password;real-name;homepage[newline] I can enter the details, then hit enter and enter the next lot of details,

[xmail] Re: duplicate messages (again)

2002-05-29 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Darren schrieb: yep, in my example, i would get 20, (5x4). It doesn't happen if a user in the office sends an email eg. (To:) [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] if a user say [EMAIL PROTECTED], using Xmail SMTP server. each user only gets 1 email. Its when an home

[xmail] Re: Creating users

2002-05-29 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Adrian schrieb: I've tried creating new users with the MkUsers command but it doesn't work. If I start the program on its own and follow the directions in the doc like: domain;username;password;real-name;homepage[newline] I can enter the details, then hit enter and enter the next lot of

[xmail] Re: XMail + WAI = Spool + 100% CPU load

2002-05-29 Thread Michal Altair Valasek
Hi, | Its defiantly a combination of both XMail and WAI that causes | the problem. | | 2 months ago I installed XMail and WAI and had the same problem. | Then I reinstalled XMail - no WAI - and did not have any | problems for 2 months. | (older versions of both XMail and WAI) | | Now after

[xmail] Re: XMail + WAI = Spool + 100% CPU load

2002-05-29 Thread Bill Healy
You realize that when you delete the spool directory you run the risk of losing some mail. There has to be something in the spool directories that is causing the problem. Why don't you look through them the next time it happens and see if you can identify what's in there that's causing the

[xmail] Re: XMail + WAI = Spool + 100% CPU load

2002-05-29 Thread Quost Support
A very valid and logical point Bill, Although I know the directory structure is big is a little bit of an understatement. :-) There are 3388 spool folders to check, and the problem has occurred 5 times recently = 16940 folders to examine. (thanks to the recycle bin they were all saved)

[xmail] Re: XMail + WAI = Spool + 100% CPU load

2002-05-29 Thread Leif Mortenson
Quost Support wrote: Although I know the directory structure is big is a little bit of an understatement. :-) There are 3388 spool folders to check, and the problem has occurred 5 times recently = 16940 folders to examine. (thanks to the recycle bin they were all saved) If you are using

[xmail] Re: XMail + WAI = Spool + 100% CPU load

2002-05-29 Thread Bill Healy
What happens if after you restart xmail you don't touch the WAI, in other words don't touch the control interface and see if that makes a difference. It could be that once the control interface is touched it starts a chain of events. Also make sure that no scripts or anything else that uses the