[xmail] Re: filter Bcc header from sendmail -t

2003-09-10 Thread Dick van der Kaaden
Sorry, I should have known that attachments aren't allowed, so here it is in text. 791c791,795 } --- if (strnicmp(szBuffer,Bcc:,4) == 0) szBuffer[0] = '\0'; } 804c808,809 fprintf(pDataFile,

[xmail] creating a file named @@FILE.rej

2003-09-10 Thread Swen Lansing
bonjour, The filter has also the ability to return a one-line custom return message by creating a file named @@FILE.rej holding the message in the very first line. This file should be created 'ONLY' when the filter returns a rejection code ('6, 5 and 4')and 'NEVER' in case of passthru code

[xmail] Re: creating a file named @@FILE.rej

2003-09-10 Thread Michal Altair Valasek
| The filter has also the ability to return a one-line custom return | message by creating a file named @@FILE.rej holding the message in |Oki, but where the file should be created ? Msg folder, filter folder, |local folder ? You would get full path to message file as @@FILE. Simply add the

[xmail] Re: filter Bcc header from sendmail -t

2003-09-10 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Dick van der Kaaden wrote: Davide, Currently your Xmail sendmail replacement (when invoked with -t) retrieves the Bcc addresses from the Bcc line and sends mails to these recipients, but it leaves the Bcc line in the mail source. Will do, thx ! - Davide - To

[xmail] Re: filter Bcc header from sendmail -t

2003-09-10 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Dick van der Kaaden wrote: Davide, Currently your Xmail sendmail replacement (when invoked with -t) retrieves the Bcc addresses from the Bcc line and sends mails to these recipients, but it leaves the Bcc line in the mail source. I have changed SendMail.cpp so that it

[xmail] need Linux binary 1.17-pre3

2003-09-10 Thread Michail Tchoudinov
I can not download 1.17-pre3 from www.xmailserver.org http://www.xmailserver.org/ It looks like this version was deleted from the server Can anybody send this binary linux tar.gz archive or .rpm to me? Best regards, Mikhail Tchoudinov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

[xmail] Re: need Linux binary 1.17-pre3

2003-09-10 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Michail Tchoudinov wrote: I can not download 1.17-pre3 from www.xmailserver.org http://www.xmailserver.org/ It looks like this version was deleted from the server Can anybody send this binary linux tar.gz archive or .rpm to me? Get pre06 - Davide - To

[xmail] SV: Re: need Linux binary 1.17-pre3

2003-09-10 Thread Michail Tchoudinov
Thank you, Got pre06 Hm... but this is not a binaries... I do not have any compilator for some reasons on my installations... Is there anybody who has a ready Linux binaries of 1.17 pre03,04,04,06 ? Mikhail -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = P=E5

[xmail] Re: filter Bcc header from sendmail -t

2003-09-10 Thread Dick van der Kaaden
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 19:46, Davide Libenzi wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Dick van der Kaaden wrote: Davide, Currently your Xmail sendmail replacement (when invoked with -t) retrieves the Bcc addresses from the Bcc line and sends mails to these recipients, but it leaves the Bcc line in

[xmail] Re: How to reject message in SMTP transaction

2003-09-10 Thread Valik Snake
DL I'll go further by saying that 1.17 will be the last 1.xx to have new DL features. 1.xx will go in bug-fix only. I need to work on 2.0 (IMAP). DL - Davide It's a good news! We are on tenterhooks. Valik. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a

[xmail] redirects better in 1.17pre06, but some fall through the cracks

2003-09-10 Thread D. Duccini
Davide- The reliability of the redirects has improved dramitically in 1.17 -vs- what we were seeing in 1.15, however, there are still email messages falling through the cracks I test this by having the system store local copies and redirect the mail on and compare. Where should I look to help

[xmail] Re: SV: Re: need Linux binary 1.17-pre3

2003-09-10 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Michail Tchoudinov wrote: Thank you, Got pre06 Hm... but this is not a binaries... I do not have any compilator for some reasons on my installations... Is there anybody who has a ready Linux binaries of 1.17 pre03,04,04,06 ? It has :

[xmail] Re: redirects better in 1.17pre06, but some fall through the cracks

2003-09-10 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, D. Duccini wrote: The reliability of the redirects has improved dramitically in 1.17 -vs- what we were seeing in 1.15, however, there are still email messages falling through the cracks I test this by having the system store local copies and redirect the mail on and

[xmail] Re: redirects better in 1.17pre06, but some fall through the cracks

2003-09-10 Thread D. Duccini
The only code than changed there has been to notification message about failing smtprelay commands. Redirects, if fail, generate bounce messages to the sender. i don't think these are technically failing, they are landing in the 'new' directory, its just that sometimes they don't get

[xmail] Re: Daylight time.

2003-09-10 Thread Rob Arends
The results of your program tz=-36000 dlp=1 dla=1 Rob :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 2:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Daylight time. On Wed, 10 Sep

[xmail] A suggestion about the file .ipconn

2003-09-10 Thread jhon wong
Davide, In order to determine how long one user haven't used his mailbox, I check the file '.ipconn' under %MAIL_ROOT/domains/domain/user/. I hope that xmail will record ip + ( last access time) in .ipconn. Now in windows, I use FindFirstFile() to get its last access time,

[xmail] Re: Daylight time.

2003-09-10 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Rob Arends wrote: The results of your program tz=-36000 dlp=1 dla=1 This shows that daylight is active. I believe the M$ POSIX compatibility library is broken. Mind ppl living on the South Emisphere trying this : #include stdio.h #include time.h int

[xmail] Re: A suggestion about the file .ipconn

2003-09-10 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, jhon wong wrote: Davide, In order to determine how long one user haven't used his mailbox, I check the file '.ipconn' under %MAIL_ROOT/domains/domain/user/. I hope that xmail will record ip + ( last access time) in .ipconn. Now in windows, I use

[xmail] Re: A suggestion about the file .ipconn

2003-09-10 Thread jhon wong
File access time must work (if the OS is not broken). - Davide Davide, It should be. But in microsoft document about FindFirstFile http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/base /findfirstfile.asp I find this sentence: ... In rare cases,

[xmail] Re: A suggestion about the file .ipconn

2003-09-10 Thread James Budiono NCS
Hi Jhon, The statement probably refers to the fact that when the file is (heavily) accessed, its attribute is not sync-ed to the disk. Hence FindFirstFile may not find the current/latest state, if you need the accuracy down to seconds (or may be even to minutes). But if you're talking about a

[xmail] Re: A suggestion about the file .ipconn

2003-09-10 Thread jhon wong
Thanks Davide and James, I will continue to do test. In before, my scan program really had deleted some active users.Maybe it is owend to my wrong code. The code is very simple,if I cannot resolve the problem, I will post my code. Best regards, Jhon. - Original Message