I have an experimental installation on FreeBSD 5 (handles only 1 to 2 =
emails
per hour ... very little traffic)
(whith just av filter)
Seems to be ok ...
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy=E9 : mardi 23 mars 2004 16:16
=C0 : XMail
Hi there,
How is the SMTP threads dispatching between domains?
Is there X allocated threads per domain or the whole threads
are waiting for all domains?
Sincerely,
--
DOLIST Technical Center
__
DOLIST.NET, Internet E-mail List Server Technology
Never seen any per domain related thread option ... so I think :
Threads allocated on a PER message basis ...
If you want a better granularity, simply install one xmail per domain =
(it is
possible to have multi xmails on the same machine, on different ips =
and/or
ports of course) ...
xmail
Hi,
FreeBSD 5.1 - Intel, with some external programs.
Working OK!
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Gustavo Galvan wrote:
FreeBSD Test #1
OS: FreeBSD v4.7 - Intel
Compiling: OK
Status: OK, working
External programs: NONE
-
Gustavo
-
El Mar 23 Mar 2004 12:15, Davide Libenzi escribi=F3:
I
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, DOLIST Technical Center wrote:
Hi there,
How is the SMTP threads dispatching between domains?
Is there X allocated threads per domain or the whole threads
are waiting for all domains?
SMAIL thread are message based. They know nothing about recipient,
senders, etc...
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
hi davide,
i hunted a bug yesterday in XMail filters and i came to the conclusion that
it is a feature, bust i think you should take take following into the doc:
a writes a mail to b, and b has a mailproc.tab with a redirect to an
external email
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Yes, a redirect is neither considered an outbound delivery nor an inbound
one. Filters (in/out) are triggered *only* when the message is phisically
delivered locally (dropped inside the local FS mailbox) or delivered
remotely (SMTP).
So if I want a filter to run on
oupps
Just in pure French=20
I was too fast to click on 'send' and did't remove xmail list email..
Sorry Davide
Do you want a translate in 'Pure english' ?
Bye
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 24 mars 2004 17:03
=C0 :
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Francesco Vertova wrote:
At 07.36 24/03/04 -0800, you wrote:
a writes a mail to b, and b has a mailproc.tab with a redirect to an
external email address c.
Now if I want that email filtered, I have to put the filter in
filters.out.tab and c, not
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Yes, a redirect is neither considered an outbound delivery nor an inbound
one. Filters (in/out) are triggered *only* when the message is phisically
delivered locally (dropped inside the local FS mailbox) or delivered
Ok, now running on our mail XMail server. Hopefully without scrambled
attachments. ;-) I will report.
Still running without problems. No customer that hit me yet :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help:
I think that would be great.
Matic
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: XMail mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 5:08 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter logics
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Francesco Vertova wrote:
At 07.36 24/03/04 -0800,
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Ok, now running on our mail XMail server. Hopefully without scrambled
attachments. ;-) I will report.
It was a bitchy issue, but I think I nailed it at the end. I will be
making 1.18 (hopefully the last of the 1.x serie) this week. If Solaris
will
At 08.08 24/03/04 -0800, you wrote:
I'm having a second thought about this. Maybe messages to mailing lists
shouldn't be scanned, since they will be trapped later on by either IO or
OUT filters. Uhmmm ...
Oh, they should: if virus found the message is trashed once for all with no
need to repeat
At 11:46 3/24/2004, Francesco Vertova wrote:
I agree that generally AV
scanning should be the destination server's business
I don't agree with this at all. I think that AV scanning should be
performed on all outbound mail. Of course, I think that customers should
also have their outbound port 25
Well, I think that ideal situation would be if a mail sent to mail list
should go through IN filters just once (for first local mail in mail list)
and not for every local delivery. Also it would be great if a message would
go through OUT filter just once and not for all NONLOCAL mail addresses.
Davide Libenzi wrote:
J'avoue ne pas m'en rappel=E9, j'ai fait une install temporaire ainsi, =
mais
dans le changelog, il y a :
XMail now uses the name of the executable ( without .exe ) to both =
register
the service name and fetch registry variables.=20
What's this? A message written in
Davide, here is the translation (not a 'strict' english ...) :
(About How to run multiple xmail services instances on a single w2k server)
I don't really remember how to, I did an temporary multi xmail services
install some time, but in the changelog there is :
XMail now uses the name of the
Francesco Vertova wrote:
I'm having a second thought about this. Maybe messages to mailing lists
shouldn't be scanned, since they will be trapped later on by either IO or
OUT filters. Uhmmm ...
Oh, they should: if virus found the message is trashed once for all with no
need to repeat the
Jim Frank wrote:
Do you know how hard it would be to modify your AV script, running in Linux
on xmail 1.17, to allow certain users to have certain preferences? Mainly,
on our heavily used mail server, we have several hundred accounts who wish
to not be notified of any virus attempts to their
Hi,
The suggestions in this answer are already in my system, but don't give the
solution for the problem.
Following the example only mail with a to to a fellins.net or pets.org
user are retrieved from the mail box, but a to: undisclosed recipients
(without a domain) stays in the mailbox and
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, D.Spork wrote:
Hi,
The suggestions in this answer are already in my system, but don't give the
solution for the problem.
Following the example only mail with a to to a fellins.net or pets.org
user are retrieved from the mail box, but a to: undisclosed recipients
Afaik I have a aliasdomain filter, not a domain filter.
I think a filter for the REAL domain and the output
real-domainaliasdomain
would make more sense?!
Yes.
Davide, i think that is little work and a great feature because web
interfaces with thousands domains slow down because the
23 matches
Mail list logo
