Filip Supera wrote:
Hello,
Tracy wrote:
If it's the one I think it is (Xmail Administrator, written Visual Basic),
I have it working here with XMail 1.19-pre01 It also worked with 1.18
here...
I've got regular domains and alias domains, but no custom domains. Don't
know if that
At 00:36 6/1/2004, you wrote:
If it's the one I think it is (Xmail Administrator, written Visual Basic),
I have it working here with XMail 1.19-pre01 It also worked with 1.18
here...
I've got regular domains and alias domains, but no custom domains. Don't
know if that makes a
At 07:48 6/1/2004, you wrote:
Nope, i just checked the source and it crashes because the xmail version
string has changed. The version string used to contain the kind of system
xmail is running on e.g. (Win32/Ix86) and xmail administrator counts on
that.
The error is in line 3882 of frmMain.frm.
Tracy wrote:
Which function and line is that? I've forgotten how to turn on line numbers
in VB6 (I haven't done any VB6 coding in nearly 2 years...:)
somewhere in function ProcessCommandResponse (open in a texteditor with line
numbers :))
I'm probably going to put XMail 1.20 up on a
At 08:31 6/1/2004, you wrote:
But like I said, it's running fine here against 1.19-pre01
hmm, was the version string already changed in that version?
I don't recall if it was or not. But I found the problem in the code that
you encountered. In the older versions (pre 1.20) the banner
Xmail Administrator 0.26 is out and adds support for Xmail 1.19/1.20
http://www.webifi.com/xmail
Sorry I didn't get this out earlier.
-John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in
Sorry,
It's fixed now.
http://www.webifi.com/xmail
-John
Shiloh Jennings wrote:
The XmailAdmin tool from http://www.webifi.com/xmail/ worked great with
XMail 1.17, but crashes with XMail 1.20. When I click on the server =
name to
bring up a list of domains, it says Run-time error '5':
Sorry,
It's fixed now.
http://www.webifi.com/xmail
-John
Peter Lindeman wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I think in 1.18 the format of a CTRL command changed. Let me see ... yes,
aliasdomainlist. Maybe this screw up the tool. Pls contact the author.
1.18 still worked with the tool.
John Kielkopf wrote:
Sorry,
It's fixed now.
http://www.webifi.com/xmail
that's quick :)
--
alex
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL
Cool. That resolved the problem we were seeing. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Kielkopf
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Xmail Administrator 0.26
Xmail Administrator 0.26 is out
Hello there,
I want to get every mail that is passing through my XMail server, so I
made a filter in PHP and I am passing the @@FILE macro to that script,
but on my Windows XP Machine I am getting a path without slashes like
?c:MailRootSpool, did anybody knows why?
Thanks, Bogdan Petrica.
-
Bogdan Petrica wrote:
Hello there,
I want to get every mail that is passing through my XMail server, so I
made a filter in PHP and I am passing the @@FILE macro to that script,
but on my Windows XP Machine I am getting a path without slashes like
?c:MailRootSpool, did anybody knows why?
This Filter will stop all unwanted file type (by extention) from getting into your
mail server. (which in my option save your system alot of resources due to you not
having to Virus scan or spam scan unwanted file types). If a invaild attachment in
found in the email the server rejects the
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
This Filter will stop all unwanted file type (by extention) from getting into your
mail server. (which in my option save your system alot of resources due to you not
having to Virus scan or spam scan unwanted file types). If a invaild attachment
Could you be more precise? What I have to put in the slashs? Like this
\@@FILE\ ??
Thanks, Bogdan Petrica.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Chris L. Franklin
Sent: 1 iunie 2004 19:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Mail
Hi,
with c code (win) I use a port of GetOptions posix function wich I guess
is Getopt::long in perl...
(http://www.perldoc.com/perl5.6.1/lib/Getopt/Long.html)
I just pass args like this:
/some/path/myfilter.exe -a -c -z -d=something --ciao -f20
the order doesn't matter.
Hope it helps.
Hi, *!
I was trying to find something at XMail web site. And the site is terrible,
because all on single page withount any reasonable structure is not good
choice. It's a shame, because there is a lot of web developers among us.
I am one of them. Davide, if you wish, I can design and create new
I would be willing to offer my help as well.
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michal Altair Valasek
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Better xmailserver.org web page
Hi, *!
I was trying to
and i don't understand why! :-(
when trying to connect with xmailadmin i get
an error like this:
Error response during 'connect'
-00140 Server does not like Your IP
this error occured after upgrading from 1.18 - 1.19
i get the same error when trying telnet to the server
my tab-files have
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Hallgeir Fisketj=F8n wrote:
and i don't understand why! :-(
when trying to connect with xmailadmin i get
an error like this:
=20
Error response during 'connect'
=20
-00140 Server does not like Your IP
=20
this error occured after upgrading from 1.18 - 1.19
What about a perl scrip that reads in a few text files and generates the
site?
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Better xmailserver.org
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Shawn Anderson wrote:
What about a perl scrip that reads in a few text files and generates the
site?
That would be perfect :) I can manage to edit HTML, if I add to an
existing structure. The problems come when I ahve to add structure ;)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from
Nope, that's easy :)
I was thinking of a perl script that reads in a sing config file, that
config file. This config file has the name of the style sheet that is to be
used, a list of files and titles (each file is 1 section). So when you want
to add a new section, just add a new file entry to
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Shawn Anderson wrote:
Nope, that's easy :)
I was thinking of a perl script that reads in a sing config file, that
config file. This config file has the name of the style sheet that is to be
used, a list of files and titles (each file is 1 section). So when you want
to
Interesting idea :)
Yes, as far as I can tell, you just create an html section begin html and
then you can use any standard html tag including img. On top of that, you
could use the html2pod to convert your existing stuff into pod format:
Hi Davide,
Have you faced statistics ever since?
Or maybe someone else on this list has a solution for this? (domain wide quota)
(should run on windows!)
Thanks,
Frederic
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi
To: Lex Kneefel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 10:48
Hi,
A few questions about the variables in server.tab:
* What's the difference between RootDomain and POP3Domain?
Where is RootDomain used/how should it be configured?
* Is it good practice to set CheckMailerDomain to 1?
Can it cause any trouble?
* Do you people normally set RemoveSpoolErrors
Hello,
I'm sure this has been brought up before, but I searched the list from 2001 onwards
and couldn't find anything.
If you configure a mailbox with a size of, let's say, 1MB, and then send a message to
it of, let's say, 5MB, it is still accepted and the mailbox has become... 6MB in size!
Hi,
Just installed it, but now the statusbar shows:
Xmail 1,20 (Unknown) !
Why the unknown?!
There used to be: Win32/Ix86
This is concerning our admin people ;-)
Kind regards,
Frédéric
- Original Message -
From: John Kielkopf
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:55 PM
Because the banner no longer identifies the server type that XMail is=20
running on
+0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] XMail 1.20 CTRL Server; Tue, 1 Jun=20
2004 20:22:34 -0400
That's kind of the whole point of why a new version was necessary...:)
At 20:11 6/1/2004, you wrote:
Hi,
Just installed it,
In a perfect world, I shouldn't have needed to make a new version, but I
was (and still am) doing brain-dead parsing.
Is there any real need to know the server type?
-John
Tracy wrote:
Because the banner no longer identifies the server type that XMail is=20
running on
+0 [EMAIL
And why can't that be identified if I may ask? :-)
- Original Message -
From: Tracy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 2:23 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail Administrator 0.26
Because the banner no longer identifies the server type that XMail is=20
running on
Davide would need to add some sort of version/info command, since Xmail
1.19 and 1.20 no longer report the platform in the banner.
Is there any real need for it?
Orion Productions wrote:
And why can't that be identified if I may ask? :-)
- Original Message -
From: Tracy
To: [EMAIL
I'm not sure I understand your question...
If you're asking why the banner was changed, it was because Davide had
requests to remove that information from the banner, so he did.
If you're asking why XMail Administrator can't identify the remote server,
well, that would require that some
No, (for me at least) there isn't...
But I suggest that you just omit the (Unknown) then if the server type can't be
determined. Also displaying 1.20 instead of 1,20 would look cleaner. The same goes
for the XMail Server frame at the right (when a server node is selected in the tree),
which
Alright... I'll fix the 1.2 problem in the next version. The , is
something else I need to take care of, and directly related to the
aforementioned (and tied to your regional settings in windows).
As for Unknown, does it really look that bad? ;)
-John
Orion Productions wrote:
No, (for me
I was indeed asking about the reason why it was left out of the XMail banner.
Not that I mind, I was just curious to know why that information can no longer be
displayed. I guess security / privacy concerns then?
For XMail Administrator, I don't care if it no longer displays that information,
As I understand it, XMail is checking to see the mailbox is already over
quota before deciding whether or not to accept the new email. It does =
not
consider whether or not the new email will put the mailbox over. I have
received some complaints from end users about this, because they expect =
38 matches
Mail list logo
