Hello,
i have Filters Antivirus, Iptables, webmail.
i compile xmail with make -f Makefile.lnx
Nothing Strange.
Thank you
- Original Message -
From : Goesta Smekal - IT executive
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Tuesday, 27 July, 2004 04:00 PM
Sub : [xmail] Re: AW:
Morning All,
Well I'm still waiting for my ISP to resolve my RDNS problem but at least I
know it's not a problem with my mail server.
While looking at the report from dnsreports.com I see that they are warning
that my mail server doesn't accept domain literals. I seem to recall
reading
At 09:13 7/28/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
While looking at the report from dnsreports.com I see that they are warning
that my mail server doesn't accept domain literals. I seem to recall
reading somewhere recently that this was no longer required or even
desirable. Any thoughts on this? If I
Hello,
I wan't to authorize any one on my lan to send mail with my xmail Server (without
authentication)
With Mozilla 1.6 or Outook Express 6, no problem
With Netscape 4.78 (i know it's old), it ask me user login. Of course the POP3 server
is not on the same server.
I tried to change
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 19:32 +0200, Philippe wrote:
Hello,
I wan't to authorize any one on my lan to send mail with my xmail Server (without
authentication)
With Mozilla 1.6 or Outook Express 6, no problem
With Netscape 4.78 (i know it's old), it ask me user login. Of course the POP3
If you do not want to require SMTP AUTH, you could list your local IP
addresses in the smtprelay.tab file. Then those IPs could relay without
authentication.
Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
At 14:28 7/28/2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
especially when one of the PCs gets a virus on it. Even using POP
before SMTP is a bad idea in my opinion because
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 22:39, Tracy wrote:
At 21:32 7/27/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 20:13, John Kielkopf wrote:
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=209.12.136.106
Yeah, looks like you have no PTR record visible. Your bandwidth
provider should be able
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:16:11 -0400 Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 14:28 7/28/2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
especially when one of the PCs gets a virus
Or have them set up and use SMTPAuth, the program.
http://www.software.bisswanger.de/en/index.php?seite=smtp
Gerald
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:28:00 -0500 Shiloh Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If somebody has an email client that won't support SMTP AUTH, =
convince
then to upgrade to a
At 19:32 7/28/2004, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
With one exception. Using SMTP AUTH I know who's account to shut down for
abuse without ever having to leave the mail log and cross reference a
connection log. Especailly if the user is sending mail while connected via
some other ISP or corportae
11 matches
Mail list logo
