Just a few suggestions
I have a spamc port for windows that will work without cygwin.
http://www.henry.it/xmail (look for xspamc)
I'm using it with spamd on linux (cause of razor, dcc ...) but I have
instructions to setup spamd on windows. I'm still using 2.64 so don't know
if it will work for
I admit some performance is currently lost on Cygwin. However, this is =
not
really what concerns me performance wise. The biggest performance =
problem I
see is the number of processes getting launched per email, not the use =
of
Cygwin vs native Win32 compile. As I mentioned, there is a SpamC
How do you setup auto-reply for an email account. I've looked for
documentation but have not found anything.
Thanks
Paul
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: text/x-vcard
-- File: paulm.vcf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of
it figures i would find the info right after I send this email ;)
Paul
Paul Medenwaldt wrote:
How do you setup auto-reply for an email account. I've looked for
documentation but have not found anything.
Thanks
Paul
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: text/x-vcard
--
Couldn't you write a program to pass the message path to a memory resident
antivirus? I know Grisoft AVG has an easy to use COM interface. That would
eliminate a process load there.
That same program to call the AV COM could have SPAMC code integrated into
it... resulting in just one process
What did you do? If on Windows, I use the autoreply available in the
XMAIL-WAI package.
Jason J Ellingson
Technical Consultant
615.301.1682 : nashville
612.605.1132 : minneapolis
www.ellingson.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I saw the autoreply script that was on xmailserver.org
We set it up on our unix server and it worked great!
Paul
Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
What did you do? If on Windows, I use the autoreply available
Yes, there is a client called clamdscan that can call clamd. ClamD can =
stay
running. However, that does not reduce the number of processes running.
The same number of processes would need to be launched per email, and =
there
would be one additional process running overall (ClamD). =20
There
Hmmm... if you wanted to have a central server do both the AV and Spam
checks, then you couldn't use SpamC. SpamC only send emails less than 250k
in size to SpamD.
I think the idea of EWall is best here. It is an invisible middle-man
than can do ALL of the scanning (virus and spam) BEFORE it
Hello,
I was notified before about error, which caused that users were unable to
login to my XMail-WAI. Symptom was that the form was never submitted -
submit was cancelled by ASP.NET validation script withount a reason.
I was finally able to replicate and solve this problem, which is related to
Hello,
tonight, the following updated versions of AltairCom software products were
released:
XMail Web Administration Interface (XMail-WAI), version 4.4
http://software.altaircom.net/software/xmail-wai.aspx
- Fixed bug in processing of frozen messages.
- Fiexd bug in domain aliasses.
-
We have tried EWall previously. I like a lot of things about EWall.
However, we found that it really was not reliable enough for the amount =
of
email we were dealing with. We received several updates for EWall that
fixed some of the reliability concerns, but not all of them. The =
programmer
12 matches
Mail list logo
