>-----Message d'origine----- >De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi >Envoyé : lundi 1 décembre 2008 18:30 >À : XMail Users Mailing List >Objet : Re: [xmail] glst 0.27 xnet bug ? > > >On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > >> Should the mnet/xnat setting bellow will work to effectly >exclude ONLY >> 64.71.152.41 but delay any others 64.71.152.41/24 ? > >You don't need MNET to exclude simple addresses. An MNET is to >tell GLST >that such IP set should be considered same as far as delay policies go.
I agree >This is simply what you need: > >xnet 64.71.152.41,255.255.255.255 > I agree > > >> mnet 0.0.0.0,0.0.0.0,255.255.255.0 (default is to 'delay' on >C class because >> I 'personnaly' ;) assume 90% of internet ip space is from >isps that don't >> sub-net at all as 90% of they own addresse space is for customers net >> access, not for hosting/mail servers/...) >> mnet 64.71.152.41,255.255.255.255,255.255.255.255 >> xnet 64.71.152.41,255.255.255.255 > > My first post reported greylisting of a particular ip even if the ip was xnet'ed : > >Actual glst.conf xnet and mnet : > >mnet=0.0.0.0,0.0.0.0,255.255.255.0 > > > >xnet=172.16.254.0,255.255.255.255 No others mnet at all like mnet=172.16.254.0,255.255.255.255,255.255.255.255. I think I missed somethink :/ Francis _______________________________________________ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
