Really dumb question.
Are you sure you are hitting the correct xmail server?
From: xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org [mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org] On
Behalf Of Barry Kavanagh
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 10:06 AM
To: 'XMail Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [xmail] User password
Done, but
I don't remember for sure that this worked, but I think what I had done in the
past was edit the users file which has the encrypted passwords in it and just
copy paste an encrypted password that I remembered to the one I was trying to
set, then restart xmail.
Seems like I did something like
Replying late to this, but just now looking at the smtp log file.
Since Bloglines is closing down I started trying google reader.
Google does not (always) bind outbound messages to a server/IP.
I see one message that came in from servr197 the first time, and then the next
two retries for that
Yahoo has always given me problems, seems like they are fairly greylist
un-friendly.
I guess the part I have the problem with is the yahoo group emails, not sure
about their regular email servers. One of the things they were doing was always
creating an unique email address in the header so
I upgraded to pre12, and then to pre14, and have not seen a sign of the
problem with the long lines yet.
It's looking good to me.
Thanks
Phillip
-Original Message-
From: xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Wednesday,
I am receiving emails from yahoo groups and am running into a problem.
A few (very few) of the emails have a header line them of X-YMail-OSG.
This line is extremely long and it appears that xmail is incorrectly
breaking it up into multiple lines. It appears that before xmail there
is a message
Title: Re: [xmail] xmail 1.25 problem with a smtp headers
Not that I see, but it could be.
Actually on the broken message I am looking at the DomainKey-Signature looks like it is broken up correctly.. But the X-YMail-OSG is about 1400 chars long, with no breaks.
Actually looking at it, the
I installed the pre11 to see how that works.
I did get one bad email through, but it may have been sitting in the
pipeline (spool file or something). Since you are rejecting the emails
with lines too long now I am assuming that the email didn't arrive new.
How/what would I see in the logs that
11:24 PM
To: XMail Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [xmail] xmail 1.25 problem with a smtp headers
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Phillip R. Shaw wrote:
I installed the pre11 to see how that works.
I did get one bad email through, but it may have been sitting in the
pipeline (spool file or something
Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 12:23 AM
To: XMail Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [xmail] xmail 1.25 problem with a smtp headers
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Phillip R. Shaw wrote:
Thinking about how to send myself an email with a line over a thousand
chars long. Hope your
My guess is that the clients on the local network are connecting =
directly to the computer running glst.
I think I set an xnet=3D192.168.0.0,255,255,0,0 in my glst.conf file to =
get around this.
I was running in the dark on this, so I'm not sure I didn't cause other =
problems with this.
, accertarsi che gli allegati non contengano virus prima
di
apr= irli.
- Original Message -
From: Phillip R. = Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Se= nt: Monday, November 10, 2008 3:58 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: glst.conf
=
My guess is that the clients on the local network
if a MTA accepts a message for delivery, it must either deliver or bounce..
While this was a nice idea at one time, it really isn't desirable any more.
Why? SPAM. I get thousands of emails that I accept but are then rejected by my
spam filtering. You don't want me sending all those bounce
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: hotmail delivery problems
At 19.16 21/03/08, Phillip R. Shaw wrote:
if a MTA accepts a message for delivery, it must either deliver or bounce..
While this was a nice idea at one time, it really isn't desirable any more..
Why? SPAM. I get thousands
How do people come up with, and keep current, their configurations for
greylisting.
I am specifically having problems with the 'xnet' settings staying
current.
Does someone keep a current list of subnets used by the larger mail
services?=20
I just got burned by yahoo groups using a subnet that
encoding it will trash the attachment wouldn't it?
Phillip
From: Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 9:43 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Is this a problem, and if so where is it from
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Phillip R. Shaw wrote:
I am getting emails through the xmail list
I am getting emails through the xmail list which Symantec's SMS SMTP
gateway are flagging as un-scannable. I saw this a year ago and just
turned off the warning but this time I think I found a pattern.
Some of the emails I receive through this list seem to have 2
Content-Transfer-Encoding tags
Don't block on catchall. I would guess you have blocked yourself and/or
some of the major email ip addresses that you receive from.
Make a list of the dictionary addresses they are sending to and only
block those by adding the sending ip's in the spammers.tab. I use a
255.255.255.255 mask on
Welcome to the club :(
I have a list of about 400 email addresses that get hit all the time, I
reject 6-8000 messages a day. (max was around 20,000 at Christmas/new
years time frame)
I am pretty sure that the source ips are from virus infected machines
under control of a master program. And the
Ok, I have been looking at this closer now. The SMTP-MaxErrors would be a big
help, but ... :(
I am guessing that it will implemented to be checked in the smtpsrv processing.
And since I am using filters.out.tab processing I won't have a chance to bump
the error count.
Am I correct in my new
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phillip R. Shaw
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 1:13 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Spam blocking filter
Ok, I have been looking at this closer now. The SMTP-MaxErrors would be a
big help, but ... :(
I am guessing that it will implemented to be checked
Problem:
I am getting hit with a dictionary attack on my mail server over a =
limited bandwidth connection. Volume is slowly increasing, going to over =
4000 (maybe 6000 now) email messages a day. Over 90% of these are spam =
from the dictionary attack.
I do use a few blacklists, and they catch
Problem with this would be that it is xmail that reads and processes the server.tab
file, little late to say what user it should run as.
Actually I think you can just set the user id and password on the service properties
in the services manager.
Phillip
-Original Message-
From:
Let me add that I think I could be seeing a similar problem.
But since I am the one that doesn't get the email I haven't noticed until
the past week that there were emails that I should have gotten and don't
remember seeing.
I am not sure that I am seeing it, but I really think I would have
24 matches
Mail list logo
