On Saturday, April 02, 2005 4:07 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please forgive me if this is a silly question.
When sending a message from XMail's sendmail, the messages have
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' as the Return-Path. I can't figure out why this is.
More important is
On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:32 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Alexander Hagenah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have to send mail to 40.000 users. I gues the best way to
do this is
by setting up a mail list. I could use XMail's list user but then all
40.000 messages will be checked for viruses and spam
On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:48 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Matic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
will there be a problem with xmail list account with 40.000 users?
Should take some time and load, but XMail will send them mail by mail :)
PS: I hope it's no spam :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, March 10, 2005 4:28
PM:
We run XMail since version 0.69 (without any problem) in a
Windows 2000
Server (nowadays we are running version 1.21)
But these days we are with a very strange problem that
happens only with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] accounts.
=20
For
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, March 11, 2005 1:01 PM:
Hello everyone,
=20
Well, I'll be damned if I know what is wrong this time.
I've done it at least three times.
AFAIK, GCC and G++ are installed on a Slackware Linux v10.0 box.
The only thing I can think of at this moment is to
On Monday, March 07, 2005 8:43 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Jeffrey L. Conley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My OS is RH 9.0
It could be happening now I never know until after. It will only do
it = some
emails the rest come thought just fine.
I had this problem some time ago. There was one evil msg in the
On Monday, March 07, 2005 9:37 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Jeffrey L. Conley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I know, but they were probably spam and or virus infected and I =
would
rather just delete them and have things start working correctly again
= than
risk an infection on my mail server.
Ehm,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, March 03, 2005 10:03
AM:
try XmailWAI. it works great for me.
Or a LAMP-Application:
http://www.ilohamail.org/main.php
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 6:41
AM:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=3DF6nke Ruempler wrote:
=20
Hi Davide,
=3D20
I don't know how effective SMTP thread throtteling is to control the
server's load. I set it to 7 and became 421 very fast although there
were not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 9:41
PM:
Three websites that I manage are the target of a new strain
of the bagle
virus which attempts to download a bogus image from the
website. The server
can handle the traffic (so far) but the log files are growing
at an insane
Hi Davide,
I don't know how effective SMTP thread throtteling is to control the
server's load. I set it to 7 and became 421 very fast although there
were not 7 threads. Now it set it to twenty but if 20 mails arrive
parallel at the server it could still overload (smtp filter timeouts).
I saw a
On Sunday, February 27, 2005 11:01 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Lev Shamilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't remember where I got if from, probably from the earliest
versions, but notice the dot between top level domains and the colon.
You
don't have that. Which is the correct syntax?
rtfm :)
Also, do
On Saturday, February 26, 2005 8:47 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Lev Shamilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The average size of SMTP log file on my network is 1 to 2 MB.
A couple of days ago it was 20MB. Well, I had situations like
this once in awhile. Usually some idiot spammer tries to send
mail through my
Hi,
is it possible that the WhiteList property of smtp.ipprop.tab does not
whitelist ENODNS MAIL_FROM's?
--
soenke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, February 22, 2005 4:49
PM:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=3DF6nke Ruempler wrote:
=20
Hi Davide,
=3D20
I noticed that if all SMTP threads are busy, XMail throws the
message 421 Server too busy =3D20
That is good, but imho it does not get logged
On Saturday, February 19, 2005 9:58 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Sasa Stupar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 19. februar 2005 2:34 +0100 Michal Altair Valasek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I need to configure Xmail to accept messages via SMTP only after
authentication or from specified IP.
The server
On Saturday, February 19, 2005 8:25 AM [GMT+1=CET],
decker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me again 8=]
After work tonight I spent a few moments and put together a patch for
xmail
1.21 that:
1)substitutes the POP3 user's pass word in the pop-* log with
(password) 2)Sets the umask to 0077 (for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, February 18, 2005 12:14
PM:
Hi all,
=20
I've noticed on my FreeBSD 5.3 box that all normal files (logs,
maildir emails, dnscache files, tabindexes etc) are all created by
xmail with a chmod
value of 666, aka world readable/writeable by everyone. I'm
sure
On Friday, February 18, 2005 8:52 PM [GMT+1=CET],
decker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw that in the install notes, I was just hoping for a more
thorough=20 solution. Having one directory's permissions be the line
between fairly=20 secure email and wide open email makes me a little
uneasy.
An
On Friday, February 18, 2005 9:23 PM [GMT+1=CET],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your Message got filtered out because it was not possible to validate
it. No mail exchange could be identified as belonging to your
organization. This is why it has been identified as spam.
This is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, February 17, 2005
5:06 PM:
What's a clear response ;-)
Thanks Chris ;-)
=20
What is the new crypto algo used here ? Didn't pass any crack
here ... =3D
;-)
It's the new leet base64 crypt algo. They said no one will ever be able
to crack it ;-)
-
To
Hi Davide,
again something about smtp filtering. I'm testing a new post-data
filter. It works nice so far, but in some cases I got -5 error back.
That means filter timeout, right? Filter timeout is 90 seconds for both
SMTP and SMAIL filters. But the filter did not run for 90 secs as I can
see
Hi,
I have this problem, we have a customer ( politician of course) that
really needs ( or belives he needs) all the mail to his
address to reach
him, no matter if the sender is in some RBL, specifically black-listed
in spammers IP blocks or other method of filtering.
I've deald
On Monday, February 14, 2005 11:02 AM [GMT+1=CET],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have stoped the xmail and inserted a manual entry at
aliasdomain.tab: [200.245.124.131]TABrealdomain.comCRLF
TAB is a real tab caracter and CRLF is real crlf caracter
Which XMail version?
Why
On Monday, February 14, 2005 7:00 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mods to do this aren't terribly hard, but I'm not comfortable
enough=20 with the quality of my code to be able to share it with
anyone. If someone= =20
wants to discuss it in the abstract (for instance, in
On Monday, February 14, 2005 7:25 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Dale Qualls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, here's a strange one that doesn't make sense to me.
RH8.0, XMail 1.21, ClamAV, Pete's AV filter, SA3.02, modified SA
filter.
Changing inittab runlevel to 3 from 5 to save resources from X
starting
On Monday, February 14, 2005 8:58 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Dale Qualls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
s43xmail is in both rc3.d and rc5.d, s80sendmail only shows up in
rc3.d. Should I whack the rc5.d/s80sendmail?
YES !
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, February 07, 2005 4:49
AM:
No, thats not it because sendmail works just fine from php or
from the
command line. My guess is I am missing a configuration file somewhere
for cron, but i have been googleing all day to no avail
Do you suppose it is possible
On Sunday, February 06, 2005 8:47 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Dustin C. Hatch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone wrote a modification to the sendmail script that removes the
extra parameters. Here is what I have for /usr/bin/sendmail
# nano /usr/bin/sendmail
-
Hi,
OK,
=20
/etc/init.d/xmail start
=20
where :
=20
vi xmail :
=20
XMAIL_CMD_LINE=3D-Md -Pl -Sl
=20
for logging smtp and pop3 messages
=20
right ?
=20
Then off to :
=20
/var/log/maillog
=20
and nothing there
(i've a couple of messages for testing but nothing).
=20
Am I doing something
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, February 04, 2005 10:03
AM:
Bill Healy wrote:
Why do you want the mail to go to /var/spool/mail/fbiondi???
=20
Bill
=20
Our goal (or better, what my chief wants) is to use xmail
like a webmail
too. At the same time he would download his mails when he is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, February 04, 2005 5:35
PM:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=3DF6nke Ruempler wrote:
=20
Hi,
=3D20
Davide, does -5 mean timeout?
=3D3D20
Yep. See Errors.cpp/h ...
=3D20
How big is the timeout for SMTP filters? Imho it's not tuneable but
should be. ;-)
Hi,
8/ SysExec result code
0 OK
-1 pre-exec filtering (like exec exclude if authenticated, ...)
-5 timeout (?)
Davide, does -5 mean timeout?
--
soenke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the
Hi,
Davide, does -5 mean timeout?
=20
Yep. See Errors.cpp/h ...
How big is the timeout for SMTP filters? Imho it's not tuneable but
should be. ;-)
--
Soenke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send
On Tuesday, February 01, 2005 4:04 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Filippo Biondi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Where I work we have two mail-servers with xmail. Now we have to use
in the same server, xmail + fetchmail. fetchmail fetch from a domain
managed by xmail and looks work fine.
this is my
On Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:14 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Alex Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is an old topic but I have been holding onto the emails
about it until I came to set it up myself.
I would like to set up a secondary Xmail server that forwards all
email to the primary Xmail
On Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:04 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Alex Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would I not get the exact same results if a spammer attacked my
primary mail server with 1 emails too?
Nope, because the primary mail server sends the message directly to the
spammer in smtp stage and
On Saturday, January 22, 2005 9:34 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm... OK. I guess I'll have to rewrite a portion of the quarantine
app to remove those for items placed in quarantine, because if I look
at the quarantined messages and determine that they needed to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, January 18, 2005 10:18 =
AM:
Hello,
=20
I can see a few SMTP=3DEERRS in my logs since I installed 1.21 and
don't know what it means. Thanks for help.
It's the new Max-SMTPErrors feature. See the 1.21 doc for it ;-)
--=20
Mit freundlichem Gru=DF
S=F6nke
On Monday, January 17, 2005 9:55 PM [GMT+1=CET],
A.Schleipen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
smtphost localhost
keep
in xmail I want all the incoming mail routed to the xmailuser-account.
this is the aliases.tab:
* * xmailuser
the problem is, that xmailuser gets no mail...
what is in
On Sunday, January 16, 2005 1:16 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Davide Libenzi davidel@xmailserver.org wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Eric Garnice wrote:
Well, thank you S=F6nke for putting me on the right track. When you
mentio= ned a=20
single devil message, it reminded me that I failed to exclude
On Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:53 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Eric Garnice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of our offices has an Exchange server that's almost finished
committing suicide (what else is new). To help the old bear along, I
installed XMail on a file server in that office and routed all
If this is true, it is extremely important that I get that message. I
find= =20
also very unlikely that XMail does not deliver other messages, since
there= =20
are many SMAIL threads on the system. So you should have so many
strange= =20
messages as the number of SMAIL threads.
Davide,
On Saturday, January 15, 2005 10:23 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Davide Libenzi davidel@xmailserver.org wrote:
You did not send me the message, so if it was a problem with XMail,
the=20 problem is likely to be still there.
Yes, I deleted the mail in the rush :[
I hope that Eric can extract it ;)
-
To
Hi,
I thought about integrating SA into a XMail SMTP Filter, so that it =
would be
possible to reject SPAM directly. At the SMTP Stage, XMail hasn't put =
it's
headers into the spoolfile - IMHO SA *needs* this headers for looking up
HELO/IP/etc. Now Davide could change the code that the headers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, January 11, 2005 2:41 PM:
Hi, thx for your answer
It is a good idea, however...
=20
Here are a few things to know about what you would like to do:
=20
1) You could create your own Received: headers before passing
the email =3D
on
to SA. No problems.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, January 10, 2005 2:35 PM:
What do you think? What could be the implications of the
current status,
and of changing it? Does it even matter (SPAM scores maybe? I don't
know..)?=20
Yes, the HELO and the RDNS of your outgoing IP should be the same to =
avoid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:00 =
PM:
Here we go:
=20
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre04.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre04.win32bin.zip
Thank you, it's up and running here. I can't wait to get the new version
installed on the main server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:07 =
AM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, January 04, 2005 7:53
PM:=20
=20
I made an 1.21-pre03 release:
=3D20
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre03.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre03.win32bin.zip =3D20
This
Hi Davide,
if I try to execute:
sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it is getting bounced by Xmail 1.21:
[01] Error sending message [...].
ID:L26CBF4
Mail From: ...
Rcpt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that's a bug.
--
soenke
-
To unsubscribe from this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, January 05, 2005 5:11 =
PM:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=3DF6nke Ruempler wrote:
=20
Hi Davide,
=3D20
if I try to execute:
=3D20
sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=3D20
it is getting bounced by Xmail 1.21:
=3D20
[01] Error sending
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, January 04, 2005 7:53 PM:
I made an 1.21-pre03 release:
=20
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre03.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre03.win32bin.zip
=20
This will be the last 1.21 pre-release, and I plan 1.21 for next week.
Davide, thank
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, January 03, 2005 7:01 PM:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=3DF6nke Ruempler wrote:
=20
Second: Could you implement my request that bounce messages
can generate =3D
=3D3D
an
empty MAIL_FROM? I get sick of returning bogus bounces (~300 per
day) =3D3D and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 27, 2004 9:47 PM:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
=20
Been running nicely on my server since its release.
=20
I plan to make a pre03 in a few days, and release 1.21 before
Jan 15 2005.
Davide,
First: Happy new year!
Second: Could you
Hi, I think the error is here (spelling):
Mail From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isn't it? ;-)
Rcpt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Server:smtp.acd.net [207.179.102.146]
=20
=20
[02] The reason of the delivery failure was:
=20
501 5.1.8 Sender domain must have a DNS MX or A/CNAME record.
=20
=20
[04]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, December 17, 2004 10:31 =
AM:
How many of you ever employed this?
=20
http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/whitepaper.html
=20
This would be a pretty easy pre-data filter to write ...
Hi Davide,
I think this is no real anti-spam solution since the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, December 10, 2004 11:07 =
AM:
Is there an easy way to add a subject tag like the [xmail]
one on the subject of this list's messages? I have a list
user created, but don't want to implement a complete list
manager like Ecartis or Majordomo yet.
No, you have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, November 26, 2004 10:01 =
AM:
Hi Reiner,
=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Friday, November 26, 2004 9:50
=3D AM:
=20
451 Requested action aborted: (-31) local error in processing
=20
I expect message.id is missing in MailRoot.
No, that is a FAQ, MAIL FROM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, November 26, 2004 10:50 =
AM:
ivan root # telnet ivan.fagbuero 25
Trying 192.168.1.199...
Connected to ivan.fagbuero.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [XMail 1.16 (Linux/Ix86)
ESMTP Server]
service ready; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:39:50 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, November 26, 2004 11:33 =
AM:
wants again
aah,
is the solution
As I wrote.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, November 25, 2004 10:22 =
AM:
Hello list,
=20
Would anyone know, whose fault is this message ?
=20
My money goes to the corresponding mail server
(the message receipients' mail server).
However, I am not quite sure.
=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, November 11, 2004 1:40 =
PM:
At 07:34 11/11/2004, S=3DF6nke Ruempler wrote:
You did not understand me. In my case is not the recipient invalid,
but =3D3D the sender ! Xmail accepts the Mail while an Exchange =
behind
Xmail doesn't.=20
=20
True. This is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 4:01 =
PM:
Why are you accepting, then bouncing, mail? In today's
climate of widely=3D20
forged envelope senders, it doesn't make sense to accept then bounce
- as=3D20 much as possible, things should be rejected during the
protocol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, November 11, 2004 7:54 =
AM:
MAIL FROM: Man_Bond_Communications_Limited[EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D20
Is that right? If Xmail bounces this address, the bounce goes to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?!
=20
Yes, XMail should puke on such address. OTOH the bounce
should go
hi,
I noticed that XMail accepts addresses like:
MAIL FROM: Man_Bond_Communications_Limited[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that right? If Xmail bounces this address, the bounce goes to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Hi Davide,
I would vote for a filter log like smail, smtp etc that logs the filter
..tab, mail_from, rcpt_to, exit code, smtp oder smail filter.
I know that I can see the filters in debug mode, but normally I don't run
debug mode but if mails disappear it would be nice to have a central log
of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, October 13, 2004 12:46
PM:
i have two servers running XMail 1.20 the first have SMTP a
POP3 of my users and the second is only for Backup if the
frist is down. for that the second do of backup i have creted
a files MailRoot/custdomains/ with the name of
Hi Davide,
Another Syntax error, now from Xmail to Xmail without filters (our fallback
has no filters).
What's going on?
(We switched our Xmail Server to new hardware at Monday).
Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
Version: AVK 15.0.33 from 15.09.2004
Virus news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, September 16, 2004 12:09
PM:
I am running a standard build of FC2 with 3 mail systems installed -
Sendmail, Exim, and Procmail.
There is a GUI utility which will switch between MTAs.
I was wanting to try XMail, but wondered if there would be a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, September 15, 2004 9:17
AM:
does anybody have any idea on rectifing this issue?
i have attached my xmailserver configuration file. pls
reffer it for any mistakes i have done.
The mailing list does not support attachments.
Please post your server.tab and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, August 05, 2004 8:59 AM:
Help! I started my XMail server, and it won't start up
anymore. I stopped it to add some domains to its (previously
empty) spam list in spam-address.tab. I have since removed
all added lines, and now it's back to empty.
You
Bah, maybe an option. Not urgent though.
Ok, but since I am the postmaster and get the bogus bounces back, it would
be a nice option. ;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the
Is there a setting within the xmail that can be set so when they reply
it goes to the original sender and not the list?
Look for UseReplyTo
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help
Hi,
I noticed that bounce messages genearated by XMail do not have a empty
MAIL_FROM but the postmaster address from server.tab.
Normally bounce messages have empty return path, don't they?
--
Sönke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to
Second question: is there any way to configure XMail to block any
unauthenticated request from untrusted IP addresses (not in
SMTPRELAY.TAB), but still allow mail from the Barracuda to come in
(obviously the Barracuda is in SMTPRELAY.TAB) and allow our users to
relay with authentication?
a)
Well then why is XMail doing so, and how can I correct the problem?
That can happen if your /etc/resolv.conf has a search entry with * DNS
entry.
such as
search blah.com
and you have
*.blah.com A 123.123.123.123
in your DNS.
--
Sönke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
I'm using 1.20 running on Windows Server 2000. If there might be a DNS
problem there, wgere would I look?
check ipconfig /all for the dns-suffix entry, then ping some virtual host
like blahblubsuelz.yourdnssuffix.net
If it resolves, that is your problem.
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Sönke
xmail --debug -Md -SI 127.0.0.1:25 -SI serverip:25 -SI serverip:1025
But nothing seemed to happen :|
That is strange. What says the debug log?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line
Peter Lindeman wrote:
Mircea Ciocan wrote:
So silent !!!
Pong!
so everything seems to run and davide can do 2.0 ;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message
I would like to convert the custom domains into real domains and
create the 100 invalid accounts plus a postmaster account for each
domain. The 50 guessed named accounts will be handled with an empty
mailproc.tab, the 50 ex-employee accounts would have to bounce mail,
perhaps with a 1KB
i have two servers running Xmail, the first is the
server Principal and the sencond works as backup
Mx.
That's a FAQ. Use cmdaliases instead of custom domains (look doc).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
It's ok. I get that too. It's the TLS data associated with the main=20
thread, and it is intentionally never freed. It's not a leak since it
is a= =20
one-time allocation. I really do not know what is going on in your=20
machine.
After RSS was ~60MB:
* addr=0x080be6b8 size=892
variables
for the SMTP/CTRL header [EMAIL PROTECTED] but the reverse lookup. Is there
any reason why NOT the RootDomain is shown?
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Sönke Ruempler
Technik
top concepts Internetmarketing GmbH
Am Steinkamp 7 - D-21684 Stade - Germany
Remember to shut down the server cleanly before reporting the leak
log.
Here the XMail.memleaks file for now:
* addr=0x080be6b8 size=892
from=0x0809863b
from=0x0808e1b5
from=0x08055df1
from=0x08055f03
from=0x0806be27
from=0x0806c15c
from=0x0806c357
You must have missed earlier messages of Davide then. You should
upgrade your glibc library on that machine.
glibc-2.2.4-13
glibc-common-2.2.4-13
glibc-devel-2.2.4-13
gcc-2.96-98
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Sönke Ruempler
Technik
top concepts Internetmarketing GmbH
Am Steinkamp 7 - D
I am looking into making a patch to integrate my leak-tracer in
XMail. It= =20
worked better than valgrind yesterday :-/
That would be great since my XMail installations are still leaking (41MB RSS
now on main server, running since 2004-05-31)
--
Sönke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Ran the mem debug version here for several day and no leaks were
detected!
Memchecker runs now on the main server. I'll let it run until RSS is 40MB.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line
Memchecker runs now on the main server. I'll let it run until RSS is
40MB.
And then upgrade the server :-)
The problem is that if RSS goes over X, the system just kills XMail process,
no matter if you have 40 MB or GB RAM :/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
Hi,
is it possible to filter out RCPT TO lines in a SMTP filter (if there are
more then one lines) so that I can change the recipient list?
--
Sönke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line
Davide Libenzi wrote:
1.20 release files are available here:
http://www.xmailserver.org
This fixed the possible memory leak and the use-after-free bug:
http://www.xmailserver.org/ChangeLog.html#may_30__2004_v_1_20
I definitely recommend to update to 1.20
Ok, now running on the
Ok, thx, i'll let it run the whole weekend :-)
Mhm, the server/valgrind/whatever crashed this evening, I restarted it.
Could you see anything about the mem leaks?
--
Soenke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hi Davide,
File names inside the spool/local directory are hashed and the value
is=20 moduled to the number of LMAIL threads. Each LMAIL thread has
a unique=20 ID (0, ..., N) and it touches only file names whole
modules hash is equal= =20
to its thread ID.
What about more instances of XMail
I hope you're not saying you're running multiple copies of XMail on
the=20 same $MAIL_ROOT, do you?
Maybe if a restart was unclean?!
Hmm, it's confusing since it dumps all exiting processes. Can you add
a=20 -v --num-callers=3D6 to the command line and stop it after
10-25 minutes= =20
Better sure it to be clean. You absolutely can't run two XMail's on
the=20 same mail root.
Maybe you could add some check in 2.0 ? ;-)
Can you add --leak-check=3Dyes
done. Log is at the known location.
I updated to pre06, too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Getting closer. Now remove the strip lines from Makefile.lnx and
rebuild= =20
it (and replace the binary).
Ok done.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
Sonke, can you set --num-callers=3D8 and redo?
of course :-) done.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you killing the server to get dumps, or it just dumps by itslef?
clean shutdown - change valgrind opts - start again is my procedure.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the
I mean, the log is constatly updated. Does valgrind dumps it
continuosly=20 or you need to stop it to let it dump?
i do
valgrind options path-to-xmail xmail-options 2/logfile
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Ok, so leaks that I saw are likely related to a kill. Hardly=20
gethostbyname() and select() can leak. Oke doke though, leave it
running=20 for a while.
Ok, thx, i'll let it run the whole weekend :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to
Hi,
I'm having trouble understanding the difference between EXTERNAL
and FILTER, other than the obvious difference in word.
You cannot change the message with external. Also you'd have to
handle notifications by yourself.
Should we give mailprov filtering precendence over filters.in.tab? I
101 - 200 of 582 matches
Mail list logo
