it.
- Original Message -=20
From: Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:54 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: dkim
=20
Yes there it is. Another way to battle spam. Ofcourse the question is,
will xmail support this and when will it be planned.
=20
Yes there it is. Another way to battle spam. Ofcourse the question is,
will xmail support this and when will it be planned.
http://dkim.org/
regards,
Wim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the
Unfortunatly this does nog seem to work :(
Any other ideas?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Namens OKI Miyuki
Verzonden: maandag 7 mei 2007 3:24
Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
Hi, Wim
Is it possible
on 64 bit Windows
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Wim Verveen wrote:
Unfortunatly this does nog seem to work :(
=20
Any other ideas?
Any more debug info available?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help
I don't see a missing dll error.=20
The only significant item in eventvwr seems to be:
Error in function {stat}
If I start xmail from the commandprompt using the --debug option it just
quits. After these message:
Debugging XMail Server.
Error in function {stat}
-Oorspronkelijk
mei 2007 0:09
Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Wim Verveen wrote:
I don't see a missing dll error.=3D20
=20
The only significant item in eventvwr seems to be:
Error in function {stat}
=20
If I start xmail from the commandprompt using
on this.
Wim=09
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Namens Davide Libenzi
Verzonden: woensdag 9 mei 2007 0:09
Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Wim Verveen wrote:
I don't see a missing dll error
Hi,
Is it possible to get xmail to work on Windows 2003 64 bits? If I try
the 32 bit version it fails. Some errors I retrieved from the eventlog:
Error in function {stat}
StartServiceCtrlDispatcher}: The service process could not connect to
the service controller. (0x427).
Any way to get it to
That would be easy, a filter with vbscript which detects the email (if
you need an example there is at least one vbscript word filter which you
might want to use). Inside the VMS you could either use WMI to perform
the reboot or just shell out to shutdown.exe
Wim
-Original Message-
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Reboot via email
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Wim Verveen wrote:
That would be easy, a filter with vbscript which detects the email (if
you need an example there is at least one vbscript word filter which
you
might want to use). Inside the VMS you could either
Suppose I have a backup mailserver and i want it to hold the mail until
the primary comes up. How do I do this? After 12 hours or so it starts
to bounce the mails
Any ideas?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general
I think I observed something like this also. But not with registering but with
sending to the list, maybe because of a signed email.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 16 maart 2006 7:25
Aan:
)Ú¯/îË©¦íy×âë-®*iyÖòÆ«¶+ʦbq«b¢ñ¦G,îh¦xX¥zÉ¢ê{:.˱Êâmçë¢kaÉb²Û ÛazX§zéì¹» ®ÞÆf¢)í
æèw* jg¬±¨ ¶j»b³[ ®÷«¢¸¢¸ êÚ¥¦Ç§vØ^)Þ
éi{ayº ÊÚë,j¡ç®Ø¬Æf¢Ç«½êè®
What I want to do is the is the following:
1. Let xmail retrieve email from an external pop3 account containing all
the mail send to a particular domain
2. Forward it with smtp to a mailserver containing the mailboxes from
this domain
I know there are better ways to relay email, this is a very
I would be interested to know, I can't imagine one
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens John Kielkopf
Verzonden: dinsdag 30 augustus 2005 17:50
Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
Slightly offtopic, but does anybody know where is described how an email =
with any special characters like =FC and =DF should be constructed. =
Webforms seem to have trouble with generating an email which correctly =
transmits these characters.
TIA
Wim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
But then agains sometimes we do. I just notices also that the ones I put
into my post are not readable sent through this list. Anywau, think
greek, german the special characters those languages have.=20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
I agree. Critical should only be reserved for the really really
important events. Most events can suffice with a warning.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Michal Altair Valasek
Verzonden: dinsdag 31 mei 2005 16:46
Aan:
I received a complained where people could not reply to a message they =
received because the reply field seemed empty in their mail client. =
Appearently the people who sent these mails have special characters in =
their names like 'L=E9on'.
If I look at the headers I receive in xmail it looks
Verzonden: maandag 2 augustus 2004 11:00
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Special character problem?
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:55:25 +0200 Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: =3D
=3D3D?WINDOWS-1252?Q?=3D3D22user=3D3D2C_L=3D3D2E_=3D3D28L=3D3DE9on=3D3D29=
=3D3D22?=3D3D=3D20
[EMAIL
=20
1) Getting a static IP address from their provider so that you can
whitelist the address
2) Getting non-generic RDNS assigned by their provider
[...]
Of course 1. and 2. are not feasible for about 99% of broadband users
who
want to run a legitimate mail server. Static address and RDNS is
Smekal
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 juni 2004 9:25
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: virus database
=20
On [Mon, 07.06. 08:05], alex wrote:
=20
On Jun 7, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Wim Verveen wrote:
=20
I am actually trying this out. It doesn't catch a lot until now.=20
Maybe the database
: [xmail] Re: virus database
On Jun 7, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Wim Verveen wrote:
I am actually trying this out. It doesn't catch a lot until now. Maybe
the database needs to grow or more 'points of measurement' are needed?
I think they need more points of measurement, the database doesnt=20
really
I am actually trying this out. It doesn't catch a lot until now. Maybe
the database needs to grow or more 'points of measurement' are needed?
Wim=20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens alex
Verzonden: donderdag 3 juni 2004 14:11
Aan:
Actually some ISP's like xs4all in the Netherlands will block a company
network because of that
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Namens chabral
Verzonden: donderdag 3 juni 2004 14:58
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: virus database
a router/linux doing nat/pat.
we don't must loose the point that there are thousands of isp in the
world,
and each one handle their clients in their way. no?
Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually some ISP's like xs4all in the Netherlands will block a
company network because
Maybe we should stop the perl or not to perl decision. Microsoft does
endorse perl nowadays and even some of their tools are written in it but
it is a kind of alien language on windows. It always was and will always
be (I suppose). I do use it quite extensively for certain operations but
only
Precisely. No java please!
..NET is ok for me. I don't mind perl for a reporting application.
=20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Michal Altair Valasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 29 april 2004 9:36
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Xmail reports --
The main problem is that SpamAssassin does not produce XMail-compatible
message, the pseudo-headers on top are not present. So this is over =
=3D
the
possibility of simple batch file.
xSpamassasinf solves this issue I think? However that creates the
problem that xmail needs to process the mail
H=E9, I didn't now about that onw. I will try
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Dario Jakopec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: maandag 19 april 2004 15:46
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: HOWTO run SpamAssassin on Windows in coincidence =
with XMail (the simple solution)
Hi,
If open source just means ' please shut up' than closed source would be
a much better alternative. I think that as a maintainer you should
listen to the people using the software. This does not mean doing
everything what people ask but listening. If there are things which the
maintainer does not
that he changed his opinion regarding this issue, so now would be a=20
realy good time to close this thread and let the MAN work -=20
what he does best.
Matic
- Original Message -
From: Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 4:51 PM
=20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Michael Schwarz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 31 maart 2004 10:57
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay
=20
RaveRod schreef:
=20
Are there any other mail servers that ship with an open
relay? All the
I agree. An email server admin should now about relaying and configure
it appropiatly=20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 31 maart 2004 9:02
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay
=20
On Tue, 30 Mar
It is in the interest of everybody to prevent any open relays. Making it
clearer in the manual might help. Installers might help. =20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Harald Schneider
Verzonden: woensdag 31 maart 2004 9:20
Aan: [EMAIL
No you shouldn't but you should also look for developments which show
that a standard will be accepted by the majority and incorparate that
one. I have now idea how far this SPF thing is in that direction.
The fact that major players are backing it suggests it might be a good
idea.=20
mpack sucks, it doesn't deal properly with filepaths. In the end I got =
another decoder from one of the listmembers.
btw the filepath hasn't anything to do with filesharing and is not the =
primary cause mpack is failing.=20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jason Badry [mailto:[EMAIL
Are you using the correct returncode in the filter.tab?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Shiloh Jennings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 10 maart 2004 22:33
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: AV Filtering Paths
I am having the same problem. I am using XAV,
I am personally getting fed up with those 'you have a virus' mails. Not
only is this absolutely not true. I am also getting complaints from
users who actually think they do have a virus because they received
mails claiming so. I am now starting to block those warnings.=20
-Oorspronkelijk
The M$ is a joke, and there's no hate involved. Hate is a tiring
sentiment=20
and you want to reserve it to worthwhile things. I'd call it more like
indifference.
Let's leave it out then, imho it does look unprofessional although it is
not a big deal. But since it is not a big deal anyway , you
I was wondering if it is possible that xmail confuses mails in the
following situation:
- Xmail 1.17
- Spamassassin 2.61
- Windows 2003
I had a situation where at one point in time dozens of emails were
processed in just a few seconds causing an overload on the server where
even the dell
: [xmail] Re: Highload
=20
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Wim Verveen wrote:
=20
=20
=20
I was wondering if it is possible that xmail confuses mails in the=20
following situation:
=20
- Xmail 1.17
- Spamassassin 2.61
- Windows 2003
=20
=20
I had a situation where at one point in time dozens
-Mr 24 -Pl -Sl -Ql -Fl -Cl -Ll =20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 11 februari 2004 21:14
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Highload
=20
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Wim Verveen wrote:
=20
It could have been more
I use xmspamassassin but I notice problems with locking of the logfiles
and presumably the bayesian filter. And I know that SA is the bottleneck
in the system, but should that create the problem I mentioned. I think
not, I would really want to know why this could happen.=20
-Oorspronkelijk
=20
=20
-Mr 24 -Pl -Sl -Ql -Fl -Cl -Ll =3D20
=20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 11 februari 2004 21:14
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Highload
=3D20
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Wim Verveen wrote:
=3D20
It could
I've tried Xmailstats 1.6 and I am seeing something peculiar. I have a
directory filled with the smail en smtp logs of december and november.
Now when I process them all at once I get different results then when I
do both months seperately like this:
Report Loglines processed
Total
This is not completely correct. It is perfectly possible to send an email
using a direct SMTP connection:
(from the MS script center:)
Set objEmail = CreateObject(CDO.Message)
objEmail.From = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
objEmail.To = [EMAIL
If the user (which is probably an admin of some kind) doesn't know what
admin rights are he probably shouldn't proceed anyway
There are some basic install helper applications btw
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag 17 oktober 2003 11:22
Just because someone CAN get to the files doesn't mean it should be
easy. Passwords should either be removable from the log as an option or
hashed (or both :-) ) I admit it sometimes very handy to check for
spelling mistakes in passwords, but leaving them out would be nice too.
Not a very nice thing to do. When you want to quit, quit. Blacklisting the world is
not my idea of fun
Van: Harald Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: wo 27-8-2003 8:21
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Stop
Ok, it might be just me but I went ahead and tried this one. It didn't
work. I know xav.exe has been started. The message has been decoded
because I can see the files appear. I can't find a report though. The
commadline xav sends to avg seems to be malformed. Instead of a
reportfile it seems to
Never mind. Sometimes you just seem the miss the obvious
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Wim Verveen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: maandag 25 augustus 2003 21:25
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: OT: Virus scanner for Windows / XMail
Ok, it might be just me but I went
I am trying to find a way to allow certain=20
domains to not be
checked.
=20
- Original Message -=20
From: Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:58 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail 1.16pre
=20
=20
Anybody actually use RDNS successfully
Anybody actually use RDNS successfully? I get to many false positives
(or negatives if you will :-) )
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Nick Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 3 juli 2003 6:50
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Xmail 1.16pre
Can anyone tell me
system.
=20
Bill
=20
--
From: Wim Verveen[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail-WAI
Maybe this one?
http://www.win2kwereld.nl/downloads/w3JMail43Personal.exe
-Oorspronkelijk bericht
To make a long story short, I just use CDONTS to send directly to an SMTP
host. Always works.
Function STDSendMessage (Mailfrom,Mailto,Mailsubject,Mailbody)
Dim iMsg,iConf,Flds
oLog.write loginfo, Starting to send message
oLog.write loginfo, Mailto : Mailto
oLog.write loginfo, Subject:
I've just got XMail-WAI up and running but I've discovered that the free
version of jmail does not have the POP3 functions I need. Any solutions?
Wim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line
Supporting CDONTS would be the best way, all ASP code can remain the same
only the mailserver is different. It's not a big issue thought, I use CDONTS
to send it directly to the SMTP server instead
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Michal Altair Valasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Filter revolution poll ...
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Wim Verveen wrote:
wille filtering on a domain or user basis still be possible?
Sure it will ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body
wille filtering on a domain or user basis still be possible?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Davide Libenzi [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden:woensdag 12 februari 2003 2:30
Aan: XMail mailing list
Onderwerp:[xmail] Filter revolution poll ...
Right now filter
One of my contacts happens to be in an ipblock wich has been blacklisted by
ordb.org. His server is not at fault though. Is there a way to exclude
servers from the exclusion list you get by using the custmapslist option in
server.tab?
FYI. this is my custmaps list line:
CustMapsList
look up ctrl in the manual. I'm not a unix adept also but some fiddling with
that made it work
Nou how about a COM interface for xmail ?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Steen Rabol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: vrijdag 8 februari 2002 16:40
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp:
I think a COM object of the ctrl protocol was what I meant, or will be
enough anyway. Thanks, I wasn't aware of the fact. Since this is getting the
attention of a few Windows 2000 sysadmins who work with xmail you might get
some bugreports in the future ;-)
Wim
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
63 matches
Mail list logo
